Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020474
Original file (20130020474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied



		BOARD DATE:	  14 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130020474 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable vice uncharacterized.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she completed her Basic Combat Training (BCT) and Advanced Individual Training (AIT) without incident.  She fulfilled her military obligation and separated from the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) in December 2003.  She needs her DD Form 214 corrected in order to apply for employment and to obtain a military identification card.

3.  The applicant provides her DD Form 214 ending 18 May 1996 and her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22E (Record of Separation and Record of Service) ending 6 December 2003.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 7 December 1995 and she entered active duty for training (ADT) on 25 January 1996 at Fort Leonard Wood, MO where she completed her BCT.

3.  She reported to Fort Jackson, SC on or about 29 March 1996 where she successfully completed her AIT and was awarded military occupational specialty 75B (Personnel Administration Specialist).

4.  On 18 May 1996, she was released from active duty and assigned to a USAR unit in Lathrop, CA.  The DD Form 214 she was issued at that time shows she was released from ADT upon completion of required active service with an uncharacterized character of service.  She completed 3 months and 25 days (or 116 days) of net active service this period.

5.  A review of her record shows she was a USAR Soldier in good standing upon the completion of her ADT.

6.  She provides a copy of her NGB Form 22E which shows she served in the CAARNG from 25 August 2000 until her honorable discharge on 6 December 2003 upon the expiration of her service obligation.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 3 describes the different types of characterization of service.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time of her separation stated an uncharacterized separation is an entry-level separation.  For Soldiers ordered to initial ADT, entry-level status terminates 180 days after beginning training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered ADT on 24 January 1996 and she was released from ADT on 18 May 1996.  She completed 3 months and 25 days (or 116 days) of net active service during this period and she received an uncharacterized character of service.

2.  Because the applicant served only 116 days of ADT she was still in an entry-level status at the time of her separation.   Therefore, her service was uncharacterized.

3.  The ABCMR does not grant requests for the correction of records solely for the purpose of making the applicant eligible for benefits.  Every case is individually decided based upon its merits.

4.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier's military service.  It merely shows the Soldier did not serve on active duty long enough for his or her character of service to be rated.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

 BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020474





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020474



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000170

    Original file (20120000170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. She completed 5 months and 9 days of active service and her service was uncharacterized. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101066C070208

    Original file (2004101066C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also asks for removal of all documents or any references to fraudulent enlistment or fraudulent documents from all military records, including those held by the CAARNG and the Defense Security Service; and other relief the Board deems appropriate. These include the following: Exhibit 1 – 6 October 1997 CAARNG Orders 279-531 discharging the applicant from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army with a general discharge under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018969

    Original file (20130018969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service be changed to honorable and issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The doctor requested the applicant's release from service and stated the applicant was unable to continue in service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for members of the USAR under the following circumstances: * after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015652

    Original file (20080015652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 June 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015652 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 16 August 2003; Annex S (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum Army National Guard of the United States), Annex E Enlistment Bonus Addendum Army National Guard of the United States) and Statement of Understanding for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310

    Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable. Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003408

    Original file (20140003408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable vice uncharacterized. The DD Form 214 she was issued shows she was released from ADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service with an uncharacterized character of service. The DD Form 214 provides a record of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000115

    Original file (20140000115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 5-6, Army Regulation 135-178, provides for discharge of a member disenrolled from ROTC/SMP. The CAARNG did not acknowledge his NGB Form 22A, dated 27 June 2006, which corrected his discharge date to 3 October 2005. Refer to Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 12 (15) for discharge for Soldiers medically unfit for retention per Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020173

    Original file (20130020173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence that shows he completed a period of active service of more than 180 days between his date of release from initial ADT on 23 September 1983 and his date of discharge from the ARNG and USAR. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty (emphasis added) of more than 90 days to include attendance at basic and advanced training and is prepared for all personnel at the time of their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024458

    Original file (20100024458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. The applicant requests her USAR discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable because she will receive a civilian position based on an honorable discharge. However, her record contains orders that show she was discharged from the USAR on 27 May 1996 with an uncharacterized discharge.