Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020113
Original file (20130020113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 19 June 2014 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130020113 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 as permanent.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his rank of SGT/E-5 as temporary.  His promotion to SGT/E-5 was permanent effective 4 October 1969 by authority of Army Regulation 140-158 (Army Reserve – Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), paragraph 5.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 October 1967.  He completed basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, and advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman at Fort Polk, Louisiana, before being transferred to Vietnam on 29 March 1968.

3.  He was promoted to the rank of SGT on 10 March 1969 and departed Vietnam on 24 March 1969 for assignment to Fort Hood, Texas.  He remained at Fort Hood until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 3 October 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  His rank of SGT became permanent on 4 October 1969, the day after his REFRAD.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, served as the authority for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provided that the DD Form 214 would reflect information that was in effect at the time of separation or discharge.  Information that occurred subsequent to the date of discharge would not be entered retroactively on that form.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was honorably REFRAD on 3 October 1969.  His rank of SGT was still temporary at the time his DD Form 214 was issued.

2.  Since his rank did not become permanent until the day following his REFRAD, his DD Form 214 correctly shows his rank as temporary.

3.  Therefore, there is no error or injustice and no basis to grant his request to have his DD Form 214 changed to record a subsequent event.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020113



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020113



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012417

    Original file (20110012417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 723rd Maintenance Battalion, Unit Orders Number 76, dated 21 October 1968, appointed the applicant to the temporary grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4. There are no orders or any other document that shows he was appointed or promoted to the rank of SGT (E-5).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018209

    Original file (20130018209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * he was assigned as a Drill Instructor and awarded the associated military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 includes an entry showing he was assigned to HHD, 2nd Battalion, 1st Brigade, Fort Jackson, SC, in duty MOS 00F4O Drill Sergeant, effective 3 August 1970. The applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015280

    Original file (20140015280 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his official records failed to show orders promoting him to the rank of "SGT" or awarding him the MOS of "11C". The temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel to the grade in which serving will automatically become permanent on the date of completion of time in grade and time in service. Yet upon his reassignment from 2nd Infantry Division and then REFRAD, his DD Form 214 shows his rank and pay grade as SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008283

    Original file (20120008283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank as sergeant (SGT) instead of specialist five (SP5). Special Orders Number 144, issued by Headquarters, III Corps, Fort Hood, dated 9 June 1971, released him from active duty (REFRAD), effective 17 June 1971, and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation. _______ _ X ______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000790

    Original file (20110000790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show that he was discharged in the rank of sergeant (SGT). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002857

    Original file (20150002857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) in item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) listed the temporary and permanent grades he held throughout his military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as an acting SGT/E-5 on 27 September 1969. Although the orders that awarded him the ARCOM listed his grade as SGT, regulatory guidance did not provide for the entry of acting NCO appointments on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012927

    Original file (20130012927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents: a. a copy of a DA Form 2496, dated 1 November 1968, that shows the Executive Officer, Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade, recommended the applicant for promotion to SSG (E-6). Specifically, there is no evidence the applicant appeared before a promotion board, that he was recommended for promotion by the board, and placed on the E-6 promotion list. c. Therefore, based on the evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025228

    Original file (20110025228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Special Orders Number 120, dated 30 April 1969, show he was promoted to the temporary grade of SSG. Items 5a and 5b, enter the rank/grade in which a member was serving at the time of separation with an indication if permanent or temporary; for example "SSG (T) (Staff Sergeant, Temporary), SGT (P)." However, Army regulations allow Soldiers serving in a temporary grade at the time of separation to have that temporary grade entered on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017431

    Original file (20110017431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 263, issued by the same headquarters, dated 21 November 1969, promoted him to the temporary rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 shows the following entries: RANK/GRADE DATE OF RANK Private (PV1)/E-1 (P) 9 September 1968 PV2/E-2 (P) 4 January 1969 PFC/E-3 (P) 24 February 1969 SP4/E-4 (T) 5 November 1969 SGT/E-5 (T) 21 November 1969 10. Item 5a and b of this form shows his rank/grade was SGT/E-5 at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009881

    Original file (20120009881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant provides: * Orders 64-10, issued by the 546th Personnel Service Company, Fort Hood, TX, dated 1 April 1988 * Permanent Orders 58-13, issued by the same headquarters, dated 28 March 1988 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ...