Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007420
Original file (20130007420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  30 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130007420 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to characterize her service.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  She was released from basic training because she injured her ankle.  She was unable to complete her physical training examination and she became overweight and depressed.

	b.  When she returned to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), she continued to suffer with depression and she was overweight.  Her commander informed her that he was releasing her due to being overweight, having mental issues, and her ankle problems.

	c.  She knows she should not have been issued an entry-level discharge because she enlisted in 1989 and she was discharged in 1991.

	d.  She believes the records were incomplete and/or completed in error because she was not at her regular unit.  Her unit was deployed in support of Operation Desert Storm.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* USAR discharge orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 20 April 1989 for a period of 8 years.  She was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 23 January 1990.

3.  The applicant's records show she was hospitalized from 6 to 16 April 1990.

4.  On 3 July 1990, she was released from active duty by reason of early release of Reserve Component personnel.  Item 24 (Character of Service) of the DD Form 214 she was issued at the time of her release from active shows her service as "UNCHARACTERIZED."

5.  On 16 September 1990, a flag was initiated against her for enrollment in the weight control program.

6.  Her records are void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding her discharge action.  However, Headquarters, 5th U.S. Army, Orders 140-11, dated 24 July 1991, show she was discharged from the USAR effective 24 July 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct), with an uncharacterized (entry-level status) separation.

7.  Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the USAR and Army National Guard.  Chapter 5 provides for the separation of Reserve Component Soldiers because of unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both) while serving in an entry-level status.

8.  A member of a Reserve Component who is not on active duty or who is serving under a call or order to active duty for 180 days or less begins entry-level status upon enlistment in a Reserve Component.  Entry-level status of such a member terminates:

	a.  180 days after beginning training if the Soldier is ordered to ADT for one continuous period of 180 days or more or

	b.  90 days after the beginning of the second period of ADT if the Soldier is ordered to ADT under a program that splits the training into two or more separate periods of active duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, in the absence of evidence to the contrary it must be presumed that her separation processing was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  The available evidence shows the applicant never completed basic training or began the second period of ADT for advanced individual training.  As such, the applicant remained in an entry-level status and her service is properly uncharacterized.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007420



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007420



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011433

    Original file (20140011433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 12 May 1990, to show in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) - private first class (PFC) * Item 4b (Pay Grade) - E-3 * Items 12a-e (Record of Service) - Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) service credit * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbon Awarded or Authorized) - Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge * Item 14 (Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008847

    Original file (20130008847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be changed to honorable or a general discharge. A memorandum, dated 7 September 1995, shows the applicant was notified of her pending USAR discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5. There is no evidence that indicates she was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military term of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024458

    Original file (20100024458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. The applicant requests her USAR discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable because she will receive a civilian position based on an honorable discharge. However, her record contains orders that show she was discharged from the USAR on 27 May 1996 with an uncharacterized discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000245

    Original file (20090000245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations) states that for the purposes of characterization of service, the Soldier’s status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214 for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from the Active Army. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013108

    Original file (20110013108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 March 1991 be changed. She also requests her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be corrected. Since she was in an entry-level status when she was released from active duty in 1991, her character of service was uncharacterized which is properly reflected in item 24 of her DD Form 214 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017135

    Original file (20130017135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states: * her records contain several errors that she has tried to get corrected * she served (in the military) from 28 June 1989 to 12 November 1991 * her records show she was in an entry level status when she separated, but she was not * her records show she had no active service or less than 90 consecutive days of active duty training * she was in basic holdover and the count was over 90 days * after she completed basic training, she reported to her station during the required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021020

    Original file (20140021020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations- Enlisted Personnel), , states in paragraph 3-9a(1) a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020333

    Original file (20130020333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 May 1991 to show "honorable" or "general, under honorable conditions" instead of "uncharacterized." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 was a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. Though evidence shows she was...