Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017817
Original file (20130017817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  26 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017817 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the decision by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) to deny him payment of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) of $20,000 be reversed and he be paid the bonus.  

2.  The applicant states:

* he signed a 6x2 enlistment contract in the Nebraska Army National Guard (NEARNG) and agreed to serve in military occupational specialty (MOS) 25U (Signal Support Systems Specialist)
* in 2011, after serving 4 years, including a 1-year deployment, he changed his MOS to 15T (Blackhawk Mechanic), in order to benefit his unit
* although he changed his MOS, he is still attached to the same unit he enlisted for, despite the difference in the unit identification code 
* he knows he breached his contract; but, he completed 4 years and 
5 months in MOS 25U, under the same unit and he continues to serve and plans on reenlisting 
* he submitted an exception to policy (ETP) request to retain the bonus but the NGB denied his request 

3.  The applicant provides his ETP request and the NGB denial memorandum.





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the NEARNG for a period of 8 years on 4 August 2008.  He enlisted in MOS 25U and for assignment to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 135th Aviation (General Support Aviation Battalion (GSAB)). 

2.  In connection with his enlistment, he completed Annex E (NPSEB Addendum - ARNG) wherein he acknowledged that he understood:

* upon his enlistment in the ARNG, he would be eligible for an enlistment bonus as indicated in the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP)
* he was enlisting into a critical skill MOS under 6x2 or 8x0 enlistment option and he would receive a non-prior service critical skill bonus of $20,000 for this enlistment option
* he would receive his first payment of 50 percent when he completed training and was awarded the critical MOS
* he would receive the second installment on the 36th month anniversary of his enlistment
* his bonus would be terminated with recoupment if he voluntarily transfers into a non-critical MOS or transfers from the unit for which the bonus was awarded (recoupment would be calculated from the date of transfer)

3.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 27 August 2008.  He completed training for and was awarded MOS 25U.  He was honorably released from ADT on 25 March 2009. 

4.  He entered active duty on 13 April 2009 under Title 32, U.S. Code, section 502f.  He served in MOS 25U and was assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 135th Aviation (GSAB).  He was honorably released from active duty on 26 November 2010. 

5.  He again entered active duty in support of Operation New Dawn on 27 November 2010 under Title 10, USC, section 12302.  He served in MOS 25U and was assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 135th Aviation (GSAB).  He was honorably released from active duty on 4 January 2012. 

6.  On 2 March 2012, he entered IDT and completed training for MOS 15T (UH-60 Helicopter Repairer).  He was honorably released from active duty on 20 June 2012. 

7.  It appears he submitted an ETP request to the NGB to retain his bonus.  However, on 21 February 2013, the NGB denied his request.  An NGB official stated the applicant was not serving in the MOS he contracted for.  This violated ARNG SRIP 07-06 (10 August 2007 to 28 February 2009).  The NGB official added that the applicant was unable to comply with the contractual agreement due to a voluntary request in conflict with the agreement/addendum he signed. 

8.  On 14 June 2003, the State Incentive Manager notified the applicant that his ETP request was denied.  The incentive would be terminated with recoupment of $6,944.44 and that no further payments of this option would be authorized. 

9.  NGB Policy Memorandum Number 07-06, dated 10 August 2007, Subject:  SRIP Guidance for Fiscal Year 2007, 10 August 2007 to 31 March 2008, with updates provides for various enlisted and officer bonus incentives. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted for the critical MOS of 25U.  He agreed to serve for 6 years in this MOS.  He did not fulfill the contractual obligation he agreed to.  In March 2012, he voluntarily transferred out of his MOS and he was trained in MOS 15T.  

2.  The terms of his agreement stipulated that the bonus would be terminated with recoupment if he voluntarily transferred into a non-critical MOS or transferred from the unit for which the bonus was awarded and that recoupment would be calculated from the date of transfer - a prorated amount. 
 
3.  The applicant's mobilization, continued service in the ARNG, and intent to reenlist are commendable.  However, none of these factors were stipulated in the agreement he contracted for.  There does not appear to be an error or an injustice.  As such, he is not entitled to the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017817



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017817



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011903

    Original file (20130011903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (b) I understand that the AFQT score I receive from this AFCT will be counted as my final AFQT score of record, for which my continued eligibility will be determined. Eligibility for the NPSEB required a score of 31 or higher to receive the incentive. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant was granted an ETP to accept the $20,000 NPSEB offered at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017328

    Original file (20130017328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 April 2006, he signed Annex E to DD Form 4, Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States. He signed a DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) on 14 January 2008, applying for enlistment in the PRARNG. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the PRARNG for a period of 7 years, 7 months, and 18 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140006914

    Original file (AR20140006914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his statement via a memorandum for record (MFR), subject: Request for Exception to Policy to be Granted for Payment of the Active First Enlistment Bonus for [Applicant], dated 20 December 2012. The Guard Annex (Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement ARNG Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment), Section III (Explanation to Applicant) shows in paragraph 1, in pertinent part, that: * he would serve in the ARNG from the time of his accession into the ARNG through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001414

    Original file (20150001414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains an NGB 22-5 (Addendum to DD Form 4 - Approval and Acceptance by Service Representative for Interstate Transfer in the ARNG), dated 8 April 2008, wherein the applicant acknowledged having voluntarily transferred to the IDARNG with continued membership in the ARNG for the period remaining on his current enlistment, with ETS of 12 October 2012. Oregon Military Department, Joint Force Headquarters, Oregon National Guard, Orders 121-055, dated 30 April 2008, show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011485

    Original file (20140011485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement, Army National Guard, Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment, dated 20 November 2009 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4, Non-prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States), dated 20 November 2009 * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) * Headquarters, Military Department, State of Washington Orders 161-952,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002085

    Original file (20130002085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests cancellation of the recoupment action that requires him to repay his $20,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) for Critical Skill military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist) in the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG) and that he be allowed to retain the bonus as an exception to policy (ETP). He stated the applicant contracted for a $20,000 NPS Critical Skill Enlistment Bonus as a 68W on 4 August 2008. He stated the applicant contracted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011511

    Original file (20130011511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, cancellation of any recoupment actions for the first installment payment of $10,000 minus taxes of a $20,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) he already received. His Annex E to DD Form 4 (Enlistment Bonus Addendum Army National Guard of the United States) confirms: * he enlisted for a critical skill MOS (15T) with authorization for a $20,000.00 bonus * he would receive the first bonus payment of 50 percent of the total authorized amount...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009298

    Original file (20130009298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When she stated that she wanted to apply for a position at the Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) hanger, she was informed that as long as the position was not a permanent technician position she would still be eligible for her bonus. She was contracted for 6-Year $20,000 NPSEB and accepted a military indefinite technician position on 8 July 2007. The evidence of record shows the applicant was paid the first installment of a $20,000 NPSEB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017103

    Original file (20140017103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She formally requested an ETP from the State Incentive Manager on 1 October 2012, wherein she requested relief from, and termination of, the levied recoupment action in the amount of $20,428.45 that resulted from the termination of her incentive entitlements. (8) Furthermore, had she executed a written agreement the bonus would have been terminated in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), paragraph E3.l.8.2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009785

    Original file (20130009785.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of a Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) in the amount of $10,000.00. The applicant provides: * Annex E to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), NPSEB Addendum – Army National Guard (ARNG), dated 29 April 2009 * Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement - ARNG * Memorandum issued by the Deputy G-1, National Guard Bureau (NGB), subject: Request for ETP for NPSEB (applicant's name and Social Security Number) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the...