Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009785
Original file (20130009785.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  30 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009785 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of a Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) in the amount of $10,000.00.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  she submitted a request for exception to policy (ETP) for her NPSEB.  The request was denied based on the fact that the enlisting official failed to date the addendum and the service representative failed to sign and date it.  The denial memorandum also states that an incentive was not offered to her at the time of her enlistment.

	b.  none of this information was given to her at the time of enlistment and her recruiter gave her no indication that the bonus may be terminated due to circumstances outside of her control.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Annex E to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), NPSEB Addendum – Army National Guard (ARNG), dated 29 April 2009
* Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement - ARNG
* Memorandum issued by the Deputy G-1, National Guard Bureau (NGB), subject:  Request for ETP for NPSEB (applicant's name and Social Security Number)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records contain an enlistment document that shows she enlisted in the ARNG on 29 April 2009 for a period of 8 years.

2.  Her record also contains an NPSEB Addendum, dated 29 April 2009, that shows she enlisted for the NPSEB in critical unit identification code/skill 25U (signal support systems specialist) (per Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP)) in the amount of $10,000.00.  This document is signed by an enlisting official.

3.  She completed the 17-week Signal Support Systems Specialist Course in 2010.

4.  She was promoted to the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 effective
24 August 2011.

5.  On 7 August 2012, the NGB disapproved the request for an ETP because the enlisting official failed to date the addendum and the service representative failed to sign and date it.  In addition, the NGB points out her DD Form 4 and Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement do not indicate that an incentive was offered at the time of enlistment.

	a.  In accordance with ARNG SRIP Guidance 07-06 with updates (effective 
1 March 2009 to 15 June 2010), eligible applicants were offered the NPSEB.

	b.  The applicant enlisted into the ARNG on 29 April 2009 for the NPSEB in critical skill military occupational specialty 25U.

	c.  NGB directed the State Incentive Manager terminate the incentive with recoupment.

6.  National Guard Regulation 600-7 (Selected Reserve Incentive Programs), paragraph 2-5, states bonus contracts are valid only with bonus control numbers which will be issued from the State Incentive Management Office to Military Entrance Processing Station counselors and reported to NGB on a monthly basis.  The State Incentive Manager will verify accession packets as prescribed by State policy for bonus control numbers, accuracy of contract and bonus addendum, critical skill and bonus unit eligibility, valid position vacancy, and required educational level.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for payment of an NPSEB in the amount of $10,000.00 per her NPSEB Addendum was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  Notwithstanding any lack of an entry on her enlistment contract, an enlisting official signed the NPSEB Addendum.  This evidence confirms she enlisted in the ARNG on 29 April 2009 opting for an NPSEB in the amount of $10,000.00.

3.  Through no fault of the applicant, the following administrative errors occurred:

* enlisting official failed to date the addendum
* service representative failed to sign and date it
* enlistment contract does not show the incentive was offered at the time of enlistment  

4.  She was eligible for this bonus at the time of her enlistment and did absolutely nothing wrong.  Therefore, notwithstanding the ETP memorandum and in view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate at this time and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the applicant's record and pay her the NPSEB in the amount of $10,000.00.

BOARD VOTE:

_x___  __x______  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing all officials properly and timely signed the NPSEB Addendum on 29 April 2009;


	b.  showing the Department of the Army authorized her to receive the bonus in question as agreed to in her NPSEB Addendum, dated 29 April 2009; and

	c.  paying to her the $10,000.00 bonus out of ARNG funds as a result of the above corrections.



      __________x_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009785



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009785



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004060

    Original file (20130004060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states as part of her enlistment contract, in the bonus addendum, she was entitled to receive a $20,000.00 bonus. An exception to policy (ETP) memorandum was approved on 6 September 2013 by the ARNG for the applicant to retain the $10,000.00 NPSEB offered at the time of her enlistment, but payment of the remaining $5,000.00 was not made due to her accepting a MilTech position on 5 September 2012. c. The anniversary payment for this bonus was scheduled for payment on 26 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007743

    Original file (20150007743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BCN was requested after the date of entry; therefore, NGB cannot approve the ETP and the State Incentive Manager will terminate effective the contract starting date. Further, the first NGB decision to approve his request for an ETP stated, "A review of the agreement/addendum supports an incentive being offered at time of agreement/contact," contrary to the second review by NGB. Therefore, notwithstanding the second NGB decision and in view of the facts of this case, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018912

    Original file (20120018912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * correction of his enlistment contract in the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG) to include his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) Addendum signed on 1 September 2009 * cancellation of recoupment of the first installment payment of this bonus * receipt of the next installment payment 2. He was approved for the NPSEB by the ILARNG State Incentive Manager (IM) prior to his enlistment into the ARNG and he was eligible for this bonus at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012701

    Original file (20130012701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director stated: * the MOS was not on the list of approved critical skills at the time of enlistment * a Bonus Addendum could not be found * a Bonus Control Number (BCN) was given which supported an incentive being offered at the time * a review of policy and her DD Form 4 supported an incentive being offered at the time 7. The advisory opinion further stated her DD Form 1966 and bonus addendum could not be found in her record, though her DD Form 4 supports an incentive being offered at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011903

    Original file (20130011903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (b) I understand that the AFQT score I receive from this AFCT will be counted as my final AFQT score of record, for which my continued eligibility will be determined. Eligibility for the NPSEB required a score of 31 or higher to receive the incentive. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant was granted an ETP to accept the $20,000 NPSEB offered at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017817

    Original file (20130017817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017817 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he signed a 6x2 enlistment contract in the Nebraska Army National Guard (NEARNG) and agreed to serve in military occupational specialty (MOS) 25U (Signal Support Systems Specialist) * in 2011, after serving 4 years, including a 1-year deployment, he changed his MOS to 15T (Blackhawk Mechanic), in order to benefit his unit * although he changed his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012092

    Original file (20130012092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement, dated 13 June 2013 * Memorandum, undated * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 10 March 2006 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 9 February 2007 * Doctor's Note/pregnancy instructions, dated 26 February 2007 * Orders Number 109-660, dated 19 April 2007 * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing-Armed Forces of the United States), dated 14 March 2008 * Guard Annex, dated 14 March 2008 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017103

    Original file (20140017103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She formally requested an ETP from the State Incentive Manager on 1 October 2012, wherein she requested relief from, and termination of, the levied recoupment action in the amount of $20,428.45 that resulted from the termination of her incentive entitlements. (8) Furthermore, had she executed a written agreement the bonus would have been terminated in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), paragraph E3.l.8.2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014110

    Original file (20130014110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military service records to show entitlement to a $10,000.00 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). Records show the applicant was processed for enlistment in the ARNGUS and DEARNG on 12 August 2009 for training in MOS 88M and a DD Form 4 was completed on that date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she was granted an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001173

    Original file (20140001173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides copies of a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), a PQR, an Annex E to DD Form 4 (Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) Addendum, ARNG of the United States), a DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), and an ERB. The NGB denied her an ETP to retain the bonus because her contract/bonus addendum was obsolete, was signed before the enlistment documents, and the BCN was...