Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007166
Original file (20120007166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007166 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was never issued the Purple Heart
* he was injured by enemy fire during a firefight in Vietnam in November 1969
* he was injured by shrapnel on the right side of his face
* he was flown to a fire support base for medical treatment

3.  The applicant provides:

* eyewitness statement
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) Certificate and Citation
* photographs of Soldiers
* page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination)
* Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History)



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 January 1969.  He served as a light weapons infantryman in Vietnam from 10 June 1969 to 23 December 1969.  On 12 January 1971, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

4.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

5.  His DA Form 20 does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) is blank.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

6.  On 20 October 1970, he underwent a separation physical examination which makes no mention of any injuries or wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  On his Standard Form 89, dated 20 October 1970, he states, "Hit in Right Jaw sometime in Oct. 1969 Vietnam" and "Xray from Dental Clinic show object in Jaw."  The examining physician's notes are not legible.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.



8.  He provided an undated eyewitness statement from a fellow Soldier at the time in question who attests:

* he was in Vietnam around 5 November 1969
* during a search and destroy mission they ran into the enemy bunker and had a firefight
* he remembers the applicant being hit in the cheek with shrapnel and receiving first aid

9.  He also provided a military photograph which shows a bandage on his right cheek.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was wounded in Vietnam and he never received the Purple Heart.

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for the Purple Heart and all other awards.  The Purple Heart requires:

* the wound was the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records

3.  Although contemporaneous medical evidence (Standard Form 89, dated 20 October 1970) states he was hit in the right jaw in October 1969 in Vietnam, it does not mention any injuries or wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.

4.  There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement and military photograph provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for awarding the Purple Heart.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007166



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007166



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011571

    Original file (20120011571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, the eyewitness statement from the medic provided by the applicant indicates the medic treated the applicant during the period 9-15 July 1966. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811

    Original file (20140004811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided the following documents: a. a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back. Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019081

    Original file (20140019081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record contains numerous documents that show he was involved in an aviation accident on 10 February 1969, in which the CH-47 Chinook helicopter he co-piloted crashed while he and fellow crewmembers were conducting resupply operations at Firebase Erskine. Documentation and witnesses indicate enemy ground fire caused the crash of the CH-47 Chinook helicopter on 10 February 1969, which wounded the entire crew and killed 3 Marines. The evidence of record does not support the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006035

    Original file (20080006035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040008255C070208

    Original file (040008255C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s medical records show that his chest wound, rib fracture, lung contusion, and face wound, all occurred at approximately 1800 hours on 18 April 1968, and all were caused by the same agent – a bullet wound. Consequently, the applicant’s request to correct his records to show three awards of the Purple Heart cannot be granted. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001070C070205

    Original file (20060001070C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel record which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. This ruling, in effect, granted the Service Secretaries the authority to award the Purple Heart to individuals directly engaged in armed conflict that were killed or wounded as a result of "friendly fire." Therefore, in the absence of official documentary evidence substantiating medical treatment of the applicant's wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007785

    Original file (20120007785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submits an Army buddy statement, dated 26 September 2011, from a fellow Soldier at the time in question who attests: * He served with the applicant in Vietnam from February 1968 to February 1969 * They were in the same company and platoon for the entire year * He (fellow Soldier) received the CIB * Their company performed numerous combat assaults in Vietnam * The applicant spent well over 300 days in the field/jungle during their tour * The applicant earned the CIB within the first 4 days...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016275

    Original file (20140016275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * two Standard Forms (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) * two SFs 89 (Report of Medical History) * medical history * International Certificates of Vaccination * five SFs 600 (Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care) * SF 539 (Clinical Record – Abbreviated Clinical Record) * dental record * letter of commendation * SF 602 (Health Record – Dental Clinic) * DA Form 3082-R (Statement of Medical Condition) * DD Form 214 (Armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012127

    Original file (20100012127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The two eyewitness statements provided by the applicant both give an account of the helicopter hovering, in an attempt to drop supplies in an LZ which was under direct enemy fire. The report, which was performed at the time, shows that the helicopter crash in which the applicant was injured was investigated and determined by safety officials to have been the result of an accident, not the result of enemy action or sabotage. Two eyewitness accounts of the incident state the helicopter was...