Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017473
Original file (20130017473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017473 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests:

	a.  her late father's retired grade be changed from lieutenant colonel (LTC) to colonel (COL);

	b.  his retired pay be adjusted accordingly; and

	c.  paying arrears to his estate.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  her father was appointed as a second lieutenant on 28 May 1938.  He entered active service on 7 February 1941 where he remained until 16 February 1946, reverting to the Officers Reserve Corps (ORC).

	b.  on 29 April 1947, he was appointed a captain in the South Carolina Army National Guard (SCARNG).  He was relieved from his active ARNG status on 
27 June 1966 and placed on the retired list and promoted to COL effective 
28 June 1966.

	c.  his retired pay was based on the rank of LTC, not COL.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Letter of qualification for retirement pay, dated 18 November 1975
* General Orders Number 120 issued by Office of the Adjutant General, State of South Carolina Military Department, Retirement and Promotion, dated 23 June 1966 
* Certificate of Retirement
* WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was born on 18 December 1915.  His DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits), dated 28 July 1975, shows he served in the:

* ORC in the rank of second lieutenant from 28 May 1938 to 6 February 1941
* Army of the United States (AUS) in the rank of major from 7 February 1941 to 16 February 1946
* ORC in the rank of major from 17 February 1946 to 28 April 1947
* ARNG in the rank of captain from 29 April 1947 to 30 June 1949
* ARNG in the rank of LTC from 1 July 1949 to 27 June 1966

2.  General Orders Number 120, State of South Carolina Military Department, dated 23 June 1966, shows that upon his own request due to attainment of maximum years of service the FSM was relieved from his active ARNG status on 27 June 1966, he was placed upon the retired list of the SCARNG, and was promoted to the grade of COL effective 28 June 1966. 

3.  Item 8 (Highest Grade Attained) of his DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 20 November 1975, shows the entry "O-5" (LTC). 

4.  He was placed on the AUS retired list in the rank of LTC effective                  18 December 1975.

5.  There is no evidence of record that shows the FSM served in an active status in the rank of COL.

6.  The FSM died on 1 September 2013 at the age of 97.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, there is no evidence and the applicant provides no evidence that shows the FSM served in an active status in the rank of COL or that he was promoted to COL in a Federal status.  The FSM's DA Form 3713, dated 1975, shows the highest grade he attained was LTC.  

2.  It appears the SCARNG honorarily promoted him when they placed on the retired list of the SCARNG.

3.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017473





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017473



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007006

    Original file (20130007006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's record contains: a. The applicant provides the FSM's DA Form 3713 that shows the FSM's: * active duty grade as LTC * retired rank as COL 7. It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014888

    Original file (AR20080014888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 October 1961, the applicant was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in the rank of CPT. On 24 March 1970, the applicant was promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) in the USAR and his record shows this is the highest rank he attained and in which he served during his military service. Although the current regulation was not applicable during the period the applicant served, promotion policy has always required an officer to be identified for promotion through a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017212

    Original file (20100017212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart; promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/pay grade O-5, colonel (COL)/pay grade O-6, or brigadier general (BG)/pay grade O-7; and that he completed a sufficient number of qualifying years of military service to retire from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). A WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), for the period ending 28 February 1946, shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011644

    Original file (20080011644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 23 June 1975 letter from The Office of the Adjutant General, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri, notified the applicant she had been promoted to COL in the USAR with a date of rank of 24 July 1974 by a Standby Advisory Board. Unfortunately, in accordance with the applicable regulation the applicant's active duty (i.e., her AUS) grade was not to be altered as a result of her USAR promotion to COL. Even if the applicant had been promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001710

    Original file (20090001710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant also states that the FSM retired on 31 January 1948, after 34 years of active service. The applicant provides the following documents in support of the application: Self-Authored Letter; Standard Form 192 (Report of the Death of an American Citizen); Certificate of Naturalization; Certificate Birth; WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge ),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000623C070205

    Original file (20060000623C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her husband's records be corrected to show that he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel (O-5). He accepted an appointment in the ORC, in the grade of O-3, on 25 July 1946, and he was released from active duty in the grade of O-3 on 30 October 1946. The evidence of record shows that the FSM accepted an appointment in the ORC, in the grade of O-3, on 25 July 1946.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000537

    Original file (20080000537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000537 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her father's records be corrected to show, in effect, that he retired in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC), pay grade E-7. The FSM's record shows he entered into the USAR on 5 February 1957 and was discharged on 24 July 1963, in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059682C070421

    Original file (2001059682C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was denied promotion to LTC in the USAR because: 1) there are two dates on his record for appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT), USAR, 14 June 1951, which is the correct one, and 23 October 1952, which caused error in computing promotion eligibility dates; 2) he was not promoted to first lieutenant (1LT), USAR, until 13 May 1955, 47...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060808C070421

    Original file (2001060808C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect sufficient Reserve Component service credit to receive retired pay. For the time that the applicant was appointed an officer in the ARNG, 1 June 1955 through 28 February 1959, only the period of 1 June 1955 through 6 June 1956, is credited with retirement points as 1 year creditable for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071122C070402

    Original file (2002071122C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In March 1952, he submitted a request to appear before an ORC board to be considered for appointment as a commissioned officer. He indicated that the request was not favorably considered because the FSM was eligible for consideration for an appointment in the ORC under current regulations and that the authority to do so had been delegated to Army commanders in the area in...