Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059682C070421
Original file (2001059682C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 4 December 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059682

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Paul A. Petty Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann Langston Chairperson
Mr. Eric N. Andersen Member
Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) in the United States Army Reserve (USAR).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was denied promotion to LTC in the USAR because: 1) there are two dates on his record for appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT), USAR, 14 June 1951, which is the correct one, and
23 October 1952, which caused error in computing promotion eligibility dates;
2) he was not promoted to first lieutenant (1LT), USAR, until 13 May 1955,
47 months after he was commissioned instead of the normal 18 months; 3) he was promoted to major (MAJ), Army of the United States (AUS), on 6 February 1963, but was not promoted to MAJ, USAR, until 12 June 1965, a total of 7 years between captain (CPT), USAR, and MAJ, USAR; 4) and that the time in grade was excessive as a 2LT for promotion to 1LT and as a CPT for promotion to MAJ. He was selected for promotion to LTC, AUS, on 15 June 1966, but chose to retire as of 31 October 1966, because of illness in his family.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the AUS on 23 July 1945 and further enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 November 1945. He rose to the rank of sergeant first class. On 16 April 1951, he applied for appointment in the Officers’ Reserve Corps (ORC). By Headquarter, Fourth Army letter, dated 14 June 1951, he was appointed a 2LT in the ORC, AUS, for a period of five years. He accepted this appointment by taking an oath of office signed by him on 18 June 1951. On 1 December 1951, he was ordered into active military service as a 2LT. The orders specified that he would be discharged from enlisted status on the day prior to 1 December 1951.

By Headquarters, Second Army letter, dated 23 October 1952, he was appointed a 2LT in the ORC as a Reserve commissioned officer in the AUS, for an indefinite term of service, under the Armed Forces Reserve Act of 1952. He accepted this second appointment by taking an oath of office signed by him on
4 November 1952.

He was promoted to: 1LT, AUS, on 3 May 1953; and to 1LT, USAR, on 13 May 1955, with a date of rank of 14 June 1954. The letter of promotion to 1LT, USAR, states that the date of rank (DOR), 14 June 1954, is the date that the applicant became eligible for promotion to 1LT and the date would be used in computing time in grade (TIG) for Reserve promotion to CPT.






Army Regulation 135-157 (Reserve Components, Promotion of Commissioned Officers, other than General Officers), paragraph 5a, in effect at the time of the applicant’s promotion from 2LT to 1LT, USAR, stated that the required TIG as a 2LT, USAR, for promotion to 1LT, USAR, was 3 years TIG. The applicant was appointed as a 2LT, USAR, on 14 June 1951, and his DOR for 1LT, USAR,
was 14 June 1954, for 3 years TIG as a 2LT, USAR.

He was promoted to: CPT, AUS, on 11 March 1958; and to CPT, USAR, on
13 June 1958, with a DOR of 13 June 1958. Army Regulation 135-155 (Reserve Components, Promotion of Commissioned Officers, other than General Officers), paragraph 41, in effect at the time of the applicant’s promotion from 1LT to CPT, USAR, stated that the required TIG as a 1LT, USAR, for mandatory promotion to CPT, USAR, was 4 years TIG. The applicant’s DOR as a 1LT was 14 June 1954, and his DOR for CPT, USAR, was 13 June 1958, for 4 years TIG as a 1LT, USAR.

He was promoted to: MAJ, AUS, on 6 February 1963; and to MAJ, USAR, on
12 June 1965, with a DOR of 12 June 1965. Army Regulation 135-155, paragraph 29, in effect at the time of the applicant’s promotion from CPT to MAJ, USAR, stated that the required TIG as a CPT, USAR, for mandatory promotion to MAJ, USAR, was 7 years TIG. The applicant’s DOR as a CPT was 13 June 1958, and his DOR for MAJ, USAR, was 12 June 1965, for 7 years TIG as a CPT, USAR.

He was selected for promotion to LTC, AUS, by the Army Promotion Selection Board that adjourned on 11 February 1966. He declined this promotion. He retired honorably on 31 October 1966, at his request. He retired with 20 years and 14 days active service and in the rank of MAJ, AUS. He was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve).

Army Regulation 135-155, in effect at the time, provided that a USAR officer serving on active duty in a AUS rank higher than the officer’s USAR rank, would be promoted to the next higher USAR rank, without consideration by a promotion board, when the officer completed the required mandatory TIG for the next higher USAR grade. The required mandatory TIG for USAR promotions was as follows:

         3 years TIG as a 2LT for promotion to 1LT
         4 years TIG as a 1LT for promotion to CPT
         7 years TIG as a CPT for promotion to MAJ
         7 years TIG as a MAJ for promotion to LTC



DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. According to regulations in effect at the respective times that the applicant was promoted in the USAR, the required TIG in each grade for mandatory promotion to the next higher grade was as follows:

USAR
Rank, DOR
TIG (USAR) required for promotion to the next higher rank USAR
Next higher
Rank, DOR, (Effective Date)
2LT, 14 Jun 51 3 years 1LT, 14 Jun 54 (13 May 55)
1LT, 14 Jun 54 4 years CPT, 13 Jun 58 (13 Jun 58)
CPT, 13 Jun 58 7 years MAJ, 12 Jun 65 (12 Jun 65)
MAJ, 12 Jun 65 7 years eligible for LTC in 1972

The applicant was correctly promoted in the USAR according to regulations in effect at the time. He was not eligible for consideration for promotion to LTC, USAR.

2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION : The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE :

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_jl____ __ea______ ___mp___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059682
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011204
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131 - Promotion
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007116

    Original file (20140007116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, they recently issued a corrected appointment memorandum awarding him 7 years, 4 months, and 1 day time in grade (TIG) upon his appointment as a chaplain 1LT. e. besides the error with the applicant's appointment rank, the applicant was wrongly not considered for promotion to CPT, MAJ, and LTC at the appropriate times and with the appropriate year groups. d. If before the SSB process is completed he is removed from the Reserve active status list: (1) Correct his records by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068215C070402

    Original file (2002068215C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He completed the Ordnance Corps Officer Candidate School (OCS) at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, and on 3 July 1943, was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army of the United States (AUS) Ordnance Corps and ordered to active duty at Headquarters, New York Port of Embarkation. On 14 April 1958, his file was reviewed at Headquarters, First United States Army (HQ, 1USA), for promotion to MAJ. His record shows : “Not Recommended” and “Not Fully Qualified” with the comment, “Has an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017515

    Original file (20120017515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment to her date of rank (DOR) for major (MAJ) from 21 July 2010 to 25 June 2007. The applicant states she was appointed in 2007 and went before an Army Special Selection Board and she was promoted to CPT with a DOR of 26 November 2008. Therefore, her military service records correctly show her DOR of 30 July 2010.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014888

    Original file (AR20080014888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 October 1961, the applicant was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in the rank of CPT. On 24 March 1970, the applicant was promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) in the USAR and his record shows this is the highest rank he attained and in which he served during his military service. Although the current regulation was not applicable during the period the applicant served, promotion policy has always required an officer to be identified for promotion through a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026100

    Original file (20100026100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, * education waivers with consecutive promotion corrections due to the findings of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20070001144, dated 2 August 2007 * a 4-year extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to allow him to qualify for a 20-year nonregular retirement 2. On 2 August 2007, the ABCMR granted his request for correction of his records as follows: * determined his 19 April 1996 DA Form 5074-1-R was incorrect *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011577C070208

    Original file (20040011577C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence shows the applicant was promoted to 1LT on 7 August 1989, to CPT on 14 July 1993, and to MAJ on 12 November 2004. The opinion stated the applicant's DOR to MAJ should be adjusted to 13 July 2000 and, based on that adjustment, his records should be forwarded to a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to LTC under the criteria in effect in 2004. The State MILPO could have granted an interim TOP SECRET clearance which would have permitted the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007145

    Original file (20080007145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds, in effect, that it was a failure of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to promote him to 1LT with a date of rank concurrent with his Army National Guard (ARNG) appointment of 13 April 1953. The applicant also states, in effect, that another error was made when he was non-selected for promotion to CPT. Item 12 (Appointments) of the applicant's DA Form 66, Officer Qualification Record, shows he was promoted to 1LT in the Army of the United States effective 19 August 1951; to 1LT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073123C070403

    Original file (2002073123C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) and/or Special Selection Board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration. The Board notes the applicant's contention that his DOR's for CPT and LTC should be adjusted based on his CSC awarded at appointment. Since his DOR for MAJ has been corrected to 6 June 1991, he is also eligible for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010420

    Original file (20150010420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence of – * any adverse or derogatory information related to insulting/anti-Semitic comments by his raters/indorsers/reviewers/commanders * an erroneously reported/charged period of leave * being officially recommended for or – * promoted to CPT * awarded the – * Legion of Merit * Bronze Star Medal * Order of Merit * award of any individual foreign decoration 17. There is no evidence of record that shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013559

    Original file (20070013559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends if he had been promoted to LTC with a date of rank of 24 June 1983, it would have given him the time in grade and the active duty service requirement to retire in the grade of LTC. The opinion continues that the applicant's promotion eligibility date to LTC was 23 September 1989, however, he was appointed a warrant officer on 24 June 1988 and was not eligible for promotion consideration to LTC. Additionally, the applicant contends that his records should show he was...