Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007006
Original file (20130007006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  28 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130007006 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the niece and legal representative of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her aunt's pay grade and date of birth (DOB) on her DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states:

* the DD Form 214 possesses an incorrect pay grade; the FSM was promoted to colonel (COL)/O-6 on 9 June 1975
* the DOB information is also incorrect; her DOB was 11 June 1924 instead of 24 June 1924

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 4 September 1975
* Letter issued by the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Components Personnel and Administration Center, St., Louis, Mo, subject:  Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army Under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, dated 25 April 1975
* DD Form 2 (Retired) (U.S. Uniformed Services Identification Card) issued on 30 April 1977
* Record of  Birth, dated 7 November 1986
* Certificate of Death, dated 7 March 2013
* Durable Power of Attorney, dated 18 January 2011
* DD Form 214


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was appointed as a second lieutenant in the USAR in the Army Nurse Corps on 10 September 1955 and she entered active duty.

2.  Her DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 7 February 1968, shows her DOB as 11 June 1924.

3.  She was promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 on 24 September 1968.

4.  The applicant provides a letter to the FSM, dated 25 April 1975, that promoted the FSM to COL/O-6, effective 9 June 1975.

5.  The FSM's record contains:

	a.  Letter Orders Number S7-600, issued by the U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, subject:  Retirement, dated 29 July 1975, show the FSM was retired from active service in the rank of LTC and placed on the retired list effective 1 November 1975.

	b.  Letter Orders Number S9-64, issued by the same headquarters, dated
4 September 1975, show the FSM's retirement orders were amended to show her retired rank and permanent Reserve rank as COL.

6.  The applicant provides the FSM's DA Form 3713 that shows the FSM's:

* active duty grade as LTC
* retired rank as COL

7.  The FSM's DD Form 214 shows in:

* Item 4 (DOB) the entry "24 06 24" (24 June 1924)
* Item 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) the entry "LTC"
* Item 6b (Pay Grade) the entry "O-5"
* Item 7 (Date of Rank) the entry "68 09 24" (24 September 1968)

8.  The FSM died on 2 March 2013.

9.  The applicant provides the FSM's Record of Birth that shows she was born on 11 June 1924.


10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It stated for:

	a.  item 4, enter date in order shown on DD Form 214, using all numerals; e.g., 73 for year, 01 for January.

	b.  items 6a and b, enter rank and pay grade at time of separation.

	c.  item 7, enter date of rank for rank shown in Item 6a.  Date will be recorded in order shown on DD Form 214, using all numerals.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends the FSM was born on 11 June 1924 and the FSM's DD Form 398 supports this contention.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 4 of the FSM's DD Form 214 to show her DOB as 11 January 1924.

2.  The applicant also contends the FSM's DD Form 214 possesses an incorrect pay grade and she provides a promotion letter, dated 25 April 1975, that shows the FSM was promoted to COL effective 9 June 1975.  However, that was a USAR promotion, not an active duty promotion.

3.  Evidence shows the FSM was promoted to COL in the USAR, but she had never been promoted to COL in her active duty status.  Although she was placed on the retired list in the highest grade held of COL, her DA Form 3713 shows her active duty grade was LTC.  There is no evidence the FSM serve on active duty in the rank of COL; therefore, there is insufficient evidentiary basis for granting this portion of the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 4 of the FSM's DD Form 214 the current entry and replacing it with the entry "24  06  11.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending the FSM's pay grade on her DD Form 214.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007006



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007006



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017473

    Original file (20130017473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017473 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits), dated 28 July 1975, shows he served in the: * ORC in the rank of second lieutenant from 28 May 1938 to 6 February 1941 * Army of the United States (AUS) in the rank of major from 7 February 1941 to 16 February 1946 * ORC in the rank of major from 17 February 1946 to 28 April 1947 * ARNG in the rank of captain from 29...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011644

    Original file (20080011644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 23 June 1975 letter from The Office of the Adjutant General, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri, notified the applicant she had been promoted to COL in the USAR with a date of rank of 24 July 1974 by a Standby Advisory Board. Unfortunately, in accordance with the applicable regulation the applicant's active duty (i.e., her AUS) grade was not to be altered as a result of her USAR promotion to COL. Even if the applicant had been promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011831

    Original file (20080011831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    United States Army Human Resources Command, Saint Louis (HRC-STL), Missouri, Orders A-02-401408, dated 17 February 2004, ordered the FSM to active duty for the purpose of an active duty medical extension and attached him to the United States Army Medical and Dental Activity located at Fort Hood, Texas. Evidence also shows that following consideration by a Physical Evaluation Board, the FSM was determined to be permanently partially disabled and retired from the United States Army Reserve in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075010C070403

    Original file (2002075010C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his retired rank be changed to colonel (COL). Army Regulation 135-180, which implements the statutory authority governing the granting of retired pay to soldiers and former Reserve Component soldiers, provides at chapter 2, paragraph 2-11(c), that the Retired Activities Directorate, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM), will...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008580

    Original file (20130008580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military records to show at the time of retirement her rank/grade was colonel (COL)/O-6 vice lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O5. Since she did not serve in the grade of COL for 3 years in an active status, she is not entitled to the benefits associated with that promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029155

    Original file (20100029155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank as lieutenant colonel (LTC) instead of major (MAJ). Therefore, there is no basis for correcting his DD Form 214 to show his rank as LTC. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018223

    Original file (20110018223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018223 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is eligible to receive the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. The evidence of record shows the applicant and FSM were married on 22 January 2010 and the FSM notified DFAS of his marriage to the applicant on 11 February 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030440

    Original file (20100030440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the report of a special selection board, approved by the President, recommends for promotion to the next higher grade an officer not currently eligible for promotion, or a former officer whose name was referred to it, the Secretary of the Army may act through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to correct the military record of the officer or former officer to correct an error or remove an injustice resulting from not being selected for promotion by the board which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014482

    Original file (20100014482.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states her retired pay is based on her retirement in pay grade O-3, but it should be based on the pay grade of O-3E as she served 8 years as an enlisted member. The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 29 December 1969 * DA Form 3286-1, -2, and -3 (Statements of Enlistment), all dated 29 December 1969 * DD Form 373 (Consent, Declaration of Parent or Legal Guardian), dated 29 October 1969 * Two DA Forms 1695 (Oath of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016579

    Original file (20120016579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her (now deceased) husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he: * elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage * was promoted to sergeant major (SGM) 2. The evidence of record shows that at the time of retirement, on 11 September 1992, the FSM held the rank of MSG/E-8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the...