Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016538
Original file (20130016538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  1 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016538 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Survivor Benefit Plan election be changed from a “children only” to a “spouse only” election which includes his current spouse. 

2.  The applicant states that he remarried after his discharge and requested an open enrollment but was never contacted.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel, marriage license and divorce decree.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving in the pay grade of E-7 on 29 November 1982 when he made his SBP election of “Dependent Children only” at a reduced amount.  His spouse’s first name was Emma.

3.  On 30 November 1982, he was honorably retired due to completion of required time for retirement.  He was transferred to the Retired List effective        1 December 1982.

4.  The applicant divorced his spouse on 26 June 1997 and was remarried to another spouse (Donna Marie) on 22 July 1997. 

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Changes in SBP options are not authorized except in specific instances, or authorized by law.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

6.  Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006.  It required that enrollees live 2 years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  The retiree must have paid monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium covering all the costs that would have been paid for the election if it had been made at the first opportunity to do so.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.  

7.  All issues of Army Echoes going back at least to the January - March 1998 issue carry the reminder: “REMEMBER:  You (emphasis in the original) are responsible for updating your retired pay file information at DFAS-CL (address below) within one year of the event if you marry, remarry, have a child, are widowed, or divorced and need to make or update a SBP election.”

8.  Army Echoes, Issue 1, January - April 2005 first alerted retirees that an SBP Open Enrollment period would run from 1 October 2005 - 30 September 2006.

9.  Army Echoes, Issue 3, September - December 2005, first alerted retirees that the retiree who enrolled in the SBP during the Open Enrollment period must pay monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a one-time buy-in enrollment premium.  It provided an internet site that would aid retirees in calculating their cost.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Inasmuch as SBP elections are made by category and not by name, and since the applicant never elected a spouse only election, the applicant’s only opportunity to enroll his current spouse will be during an “Open Season” if and when one is announced. 

2.  It is noted that the applicant did not take advantage of one open season that occurred since his marriage to his current spouse and he is encouraged to read Army Echoes that is dispatched to Army retirees in order to be aware of when an open season is approved.  The applicant is advised that open season enrollments typically require payment of buy-in premiums dating back to the time a retiree first could have enrolled in a particular category of coverage.  In the applicant’s case that means in addition to back premiums since his marriage to Donna, he would owe premiums to cover the nearly 15 years between his retirement and divorce from Emma. 

3.  Therefore, since SBP elections are irrevocable unless an open season is in effect, there are no provisions for changing his election at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016538





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016538



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002025

    Original file (20090002025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that at the time he made his SBP election, he was unmarried and elected the child only option for his daughter who was a college student at the time. Army Echoes, Issue 1, January - April 2005 first alerted retirees that an SBP Open Enrollment period would run from 1 October 2005 - 30 September 2006. However, the applicant has not provided and his records do not contain any evidence to show that the applicant notified either the Army or the DFAS within 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011839

    Original file (20100011839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within one year of his marriage. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 March 1993, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002810C070206

    Original file (20050002810C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 establishes an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006. On 28 February 2005, the Board analyst requested that the applicant indicate his acknowledgement of the cost of correcting his records to show he enrolled in the SBP during the 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000 Open Season and that he still desired to have his records corrected. Records at DFAS show he attempted to enroll in the SBP at that time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001369

    Original file (20090001369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her previous request that the records of her husband, the former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant appealed to the ABCMR in an application dated 1 August 2007 requesting that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he elected to change his SBP coverage from "Natural...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013792

    Original file (20070013792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high, the enrollment premium alone could exceed $50,000. The available evidence shows that the FSM was eligible to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage when it was established in 1972 or during any one of several subsequent Open Seasons. Even if the FSM had attempted to enroll in the SBP during the 1 October 2005 through 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011300

    Original file (20080011300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant married on 8 May 1999. The FSM married the applicant in May 1999. However, the Army Echoes issued at the time he married the applicant reminded retirees that if they remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting DFAS, clearly indicating that an SBP election could be made upon remarriage and clearly implying that the new wife could be covered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002627

    Original file (20120002627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage, based on the full amount. The FSM was honorably retired on 31 July 1992 and he was placed on the retired list in his retired rank of MAJ on 1 August 1992. Prior to retirement the FSM was provided an opportunity to make an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008231

    Original file (20090008231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he had no eligible spouse at the time of his retirement and that he submitted a request to enroll his current spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement in 1991, the applicant made an SBP election to decline all coverage. When the applicant attempted to enroll his new spouse in the SBP during the FY06 Open Season, he was incorrectly informed that...