Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013792
Original file (20070013792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  25 March 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070013792 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mrs. Nancy L. Amos

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Shirley L. Powell

Chairperson

Ms. Yolanda Maldonado

Member

Mr. Edward E. Montgomery

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant makes no additional statement.

3.  The applicant provides the FSM’s death certificate; their marriage certificate; and the FSM’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 July 1966.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was inducted into the Army on 4 July 1945.  He married F___ on     7 December 1956.

2.  On 29 July 1963, the FSM elected not to participate in the Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan (RSFPP).

3.  The FSM retired on 31 July 1966.

4.  The FSM and the applicant married on 20 November 2004.  The certificate of marriage indicates that the FSM’s one previous marriage ended with the death of his spouse in October 2002.

5.  The FSM died on 17 January 2006.

6.  Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) show that the FSM never paid for the SBP.

7.  Public Law 87-381, enacted 4 October 1961, established the RSFPP.  It covered only persons dependent on the member at the time of his retirement. 

8.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the RSFPP and established the SBP.  Upon creation of the SBP, an 18-month Open Season was conducted from 21 September 1972 through 20 March 1974, in which all pre-1972 retirees were given the option to enroll.  

9.  Public Law 97-35, enacted 12 August 1981, established the second Open Season from 1 October 1981 through 30 September 1982.  It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  Extensive publicity of this Open Season was given in Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.

10.  Public Law 101-189, enacted 29 November 1989, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 1991 (but deferred to 1 April 1992) through 30 September 1992.  It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  Extensive publicity of this Open Season was given in Army Echoes.

11.  Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000.  It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity. The retiree must have paid monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a one-time, lump sum enrollment premium.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.  Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high, the enrollment premium alone could exceed $50,000. 

12.  Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006.  It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  The retiree must have paid monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium covering all the costs that would have been paid for the election if it had been made at the first opportunity to do so.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.  Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows that the FSM was eligible to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage when it was established in 1972 or during any one of several subsequent Open Seasons.  Records at DFAS show that he never paid for the SBP, and there is no evidence to show that he ever intended or attempted to enroll in the SBP (corroborated by the fact that he elected not to participate in the RSFPP).

2.  The FSM and the applicant married on 20 November 2004.  Even if the    FSM had attempted to enroll in the SBP during the 1 October 2005 through       30 September 2006 Open Season, that enrollment would have required that he live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  The FSM died on 17 January 2006.

3.  Based on the above, there is no evidence that would warrant granting the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__slp___  __ym____  __eem___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__Shirley L. Powell___
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070013792
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
137.01
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077690C070215

    Original file (2002077690C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). An election to provide an annuity of one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth of the member's retired pay had to be made before the end of the 18th year of service. Records at DFAS-CL show that he failed to enroll in the SBP when it was established in 1972 and there is no evidence to show he attempted to enroll during a subsequent Open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013961

    Original file (20070013961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. At this time but before 1 September 1969, a retired member who was participating in the RSFPP without inclusion of the former option 4 could have elected to have that option included in his election. The FSM retired in November 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089775C070403

    Original file (2003089775C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The FSM married for the first time prior to the second SBP Open Season. Extensive publicity and information about the SBP was provided to all previously retired service members and he had several opportunities to enroll in the SBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000812

    Original file (20090000812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that she be designated as the annuitant of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The FSM's record contains a copy of a DA Form 1041 (Election of Options Under Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan) signed and witnessed on 4 March 1965, which shows in item 11 that he elected not to receive reduced retired pay in order to provide an annuity for his dependants. Extensive publicity was given in Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005999

    Original file (20130005999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 November 1952. His service record does not show that he made an SBP election. The FSM served in the Regular Army from 28 November 1952 to 31 January 1955.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065549C070421

    Original file (2001065549C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM military records show: He retired before the SBP was established; however, there is no evidence to show he enrolled in either of the two previous survivor benefit programs available to him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008680

    Original file (20080008680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM’s military service records show that he reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 21 June 1974. U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 memorandum, dated 4 February 1992, shows that the FSM was notified that he completed the required years of service for eligibility for retired pay at age 60. Public Law 95-397 extended coverage under the SBP to members of Reserve Components who would be eligible for Reserve (Non-Regular Service) retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005403

    Original file (20090005403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 JULY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005403 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement, the applicant elected "children only" SBP coverage. The next available Open Seasons during which the applicant could have enrolled with his spouse as beneficiary were either 1 March 1999 – 29 February 2000 or 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006.