Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016365
Original file (20130016365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016365 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, removal from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 13 January 2000.  He requests, in the alternative, that the DA Form 1059 be transferred to the restricted portion of his AMHRR.

2.  The applicant states:

* He was able to return to the same Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) and pass
* He is aware he failed PLDC prior, but he believes that once he returned to the course and passed the DA Form 1059 should have been removed
* He does not believe the failed course should be held against him for progression

3.  The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 1059, dated 13 January 2000, and a DA Form 1059, dated 8 February 2001.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 January 1997 in pay grade E-1.  He completed medical specialist training.  He was promoted through the ranks to specialist (E-4) on 23 March 1999.  He successfully completed Operation Room Specialist Course 6-99 on 27 October 1999.

3.  On 13 January 2000, the applicant was released from PLDC Class 3-00 for failure to achieve course standards by failing a second attempt on the written exam.  The DA Form 1059 he received states he may return to PLDC as soon as his chain of command feels he could achieve course standards.  This DA Form 1059 is filed in the performance portion of his AMHRR.

4.  On 8 February 2001, the applicant achieved course standards in PLDC Class 3-01.  The DA Form 1059 he received shows he completed all requirements in accordance with the program of instruction and graduated with an academic average of 87 percent.  This DA Form 1059 is filed in the performance portion of his AMHRR.

5.  On 8 February 2001, the applicant was promoted to sergeant (E-5).  He was promoted to staff sergeant (E-6) on 1 December 2004.

6.  The applicant's records show he is currently on active duty in the RA serving in pay grade E-6.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides policies, operating tasks, and steps governing the AMHRR.  Depending on the purpose, documents will be filed in the AMHRR in one of three sections:  performance, service, or restricted.  This Army regulation also instructs that once placed in the AMHRR, the document becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed or moved to another part of the AMHRR, unless directed by appropriate authority.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted.  His supporting evidence has been considered.

2.  The applicant’s AMHRR properly contains both copies of the DA Form 1059 he received as a result of attending PLDC.  

3.  According to the applicable regulation, once placed in the AMHRR, the document becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed or moved to another part of the AMHRR, unless directed by appropriate authority.

4.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes.  The information in those records must reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  

5.  The applicant has not provided any evidence showing that the filing of the DA Form 1059 dated 13 January 2000 in the performance portion of his AMHRR has or will in any way hinder his progression in the military.  In any case, both DA Forms 1059 are a historical record of his service.

6.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016365



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016365



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018297

    Original file (20100018297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of two DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) dated 19 July 1999 and 26 February 2001 from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The document will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed. The applicable regulation states that once a document...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016013

    Original file (20120016013.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) covering the period 5 July to 3 August 2005 wherein it does not show he was placed on the Commandant's List from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * replacing it with the DA Form 1059 which shows his placement on the Commandant's List 2. He provides evidence where it appears that a corrected DA Form 1059 was issued which contains his SSN and shows his placement on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016258

    Original file (20070016258.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of a negative DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Table 2-1 of AR 600-8-104 states that the DA Form 1059 will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF. This DA Form 1059, dated 1 August 2001, is also filed in her P fiche.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009267

    Original file (20070009267.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that: a. she has two DA forms 1059 showing she completed Phase I of BNCOC; b. she has completed the Warrior Leadership Course in 2006 and would like to have the DA Form 1059 for PLDC removed; c. she was awarded a certificate of achievement that is showing the wrong year; and d. she only needs one DD Form 214 in her OMPF. The applicant's records also show that she was released from active duty on 23 October 1999 in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006355

    Original file (20140006355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) for the period from 5 through 13 January 2000 (hereafter referred to as the contested AER) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). The applicant states: a. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows the contested AER contains any administrative deficiencies or that it was not prepared in compliance with applicable regulations and policy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006143

    Original file (20120006143.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) dated 7 April 2000 from his Official Military Personnel File (now known as the Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR)). The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 7 March 1995 for a period of 8 years and training as a ground surveillance radar operator. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that an error or injustice exists in her case, there appears to be no basis to grant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073081C070403

    Original file (2002073081C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), or be transferred to his Restricted (R) fiche, of his OMPF. The applicant's DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, was properly filed on the Performance (P) fiche of his OMPF in accordance with applicable regulations. __mp___ ___ho__ __cp___ GRANT AS STATED IN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000932

    Original file (20150000932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, since there is no error or injustice in her case, there is no basis to grant her request to transfer a properly filed document in her OMPF to the restricted section of her OMPF. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150000932 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000835

    Original file (20140000835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period ending 11 March 2013 currently filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) or transfer to the restricted folder. Appendix B (Documents Authorized for Filing in the AMHRR and/or Interactive Personnel Electronics Records Management System), Table B-1 (Authorized Documents), shows the DA Form 1059 is filed in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008931

    Original file (20090008931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 19 April 2001 through 10 May 2001 be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). There is no evidence that the DA Form 1059 for the period 19 April 2001 through 10 May 2001 was improperly issued or that it was improperly filed in the applicant's OMPF. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of...