Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018297
Original file (20100018297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  30 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018297 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of two DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) dated 19 July 1999 and 26 February 2001 from her official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states she successfully completed the Warrior Leader Course (WLC) in August 2007.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years on 21 January 1994 and she completed training as an administrative specialist.  She remained on active duty through reenlistments and extensions.

2.  On 19 July 1999, the applicant failed to achieve course standards when she was attending the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC), Class 
06-99.  A DA Form 1059 shows she was released from the course due to failure to achieve a passing score on "Written Exam 3" after being tested twice.





3.  On 26 February 2001, the applicant was attending PLDC 301 (A) when she failed to achieve course standards.  The DA Form 1059 shows she was a two time "No Go" on land navigation.

4.  On 7 September 2007, the applicant attended WLC, 009-07.  The DA Form 1059 she was issued shows she achieved course standards.

5.  The DA Forms 1059 for each of the stated courses were filed on her OMPF.

6.  Army Regulation 623-1 (Academic Evaluation Reporting System) establishes the policies and procedures for the Academic Evaluation Reporting System.  It also provides instructions for preparing, processing and using the DA Form 1059.

7.  Army Regulation 623-1, chapter 2, paragraph 2-1, states that service schools and Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Academy commandants are responsible for preparing the DA Form 1059 within 60 days after the student's graduation or termination from the school or academy. In preparing these reports, all significant information that can be evaluated must be reported.  The same care and attention must be exercised in preparing this report as is exercised in preparing officer and NCO evaluation reports.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/Records) provides policy and procedure for maintenance of a Soldier's personal information.  The Performance fiche (P-fiche) of a Soldier's OMPF is used to document the Soldier's performance.  This regulation states, in pertinent part, that the P-fiche will be used for filing performance, commendatory, and disciplinary data.  The P-fiche is routinely used by career managers and selection boards.  Documents placed on the P-fiche are limited to those that provide evidence of a Soldier's demonstrated performance.  These documents are used for evaluation and selection purposes.  Documents will not be obliterated or moved from the P-fiche unless directed by an authority authorized to correct or move documents filed on the P-fiche.

9.  Paragraph 2-4.a. states that once placed in the OMPF a document becomes a permanent part of that file.  The document will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been considered.  However, the evidence shows she failed to meet course standards in PLDC, Class 06-99 and PLDC 301 (A).  She was issued two DA Forms 1059 showing this information and they were properly filed in her OMPF

2.  Although the applicant subsequently achieved course standards when she successfully completed WLC 009-07, it is not a sufficient justification to warrant the requested relief. 

3.  The applicable regulation states that once a document has been directed for filing in the OMPF, it is presumed to be administratively correct and to have been filed in accordance with the regulation.  It also states that documents will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche, unless directed by, among other agencies, the ABCMR, when documents have been improperly filed.  There is no evidence the academic evaluation reports were improperly filed; therefore, there is no justifiable reason to remove the academic evaluation reports from the applicant's OMPF.

4.  By regulation, there must be clear and compelling evidence to support the removal of a properly completed, facially valid record from a Soldier’s OMPF.  Absent any evidence meeting this regulatory standard, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support removing the document in question from the applicant’s OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018297



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018297



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016258

    Original file (20070016258.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of a negative DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Table 2-1 of AR 600-8-104 states that the DA Form 1059 will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF. This DA Form 1059, dated 1 August 2001, is also filed in her P fiche.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013770C070205

    Original file (20060013770C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of an Academic Evaluation Report (AER) (DA Form 1059) dated 11 March 1997 from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, absent evidence to show that the contested AER is improperly filed in her OMPF, there appears to be no basis to grant her request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009648C070205

    Original file (20060009648C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his application to the Board, the applicant based his request for removal of the DA Form 1059, dated 25 September 2003, on the fact he returned to the AMEDD NCO Academy and successfully completed ANCOC and met the Army standard. The document will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001046

    Original file (20090001046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) ending 22 January 2003 from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The AER in question is properly filed in the applicant's OMPF in accordance with the applicable regulation to reflect that she attended the course and was released from the course for medical reasons. The Army has an interest in maintaining records of Soldiers who attend formal courses of instruction and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009267

    Original file (20070009267.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that: a. she has two DA forms 1059 showing she completed Phase I of BNCOC; b. she has completed the Warrior Leadership Course in 2006 and would like to have the DA Form 1059 for PLDC removed; c. she was awarded a certificate of achievement that is showing the wrong year; and d. she only needs one DD Form 214 in her OMPF. The applicant's records also show that she was released from active duty on 23 October 1999 in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008931

    Original file (20090008931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 19 April 2001 through 10 May 2001 be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). There is no evidence that the DA Form 1059 for the period 19 April 2001 through 10 May 2001 was improperly issued or that it was improperly filed in the applicant's OMPF. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073081C070403

    Original file (2002073081C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), or be transferred to his Restricted (R) fiche, of his OMPF. The applicant's DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, was properly filed on the Performance (P) fiche of his OMPF in accordance with applicable regulations. __mp___ ___ho__ __cp___ GRANT AS STATED IN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000450C070206

    Original file (20050000450C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) dated 17 July 1996 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and promotion reconsideration to the pay grade of E-7 by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB). Board members may not record their reasons or give reasons for selection or nonselection. It states, in pertinent part, that the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel (DCSPER) or its designee may approve cases for referral to a STAB upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079146C070215

    Original file (2002079146C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the contested AER was properly filed in the performance section of the applicant's OMPF. The Board considered the applicant's request for removal of the contested AER. That so much of the application as it relates to removal of the contested AER entirely from the OMPF is denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006388

    Original file (20150006388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 17 March 2010 through 1 April 2010 that shows he achieved course standards for the Warrior Leader Course (WLC) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The regulation states DA Forms 1059 will be filed in the performance folder of the OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA...