Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013167
Original file (20130013167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  18 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013167 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states:

* he retired out of the Virgin Islands National Guard and he was never given a retirement briefing
* he was unaware his Post 9/11 education benefits were transferable and, therefore, not afforded the opportunity to complete the necessary documentation to transfer the benefits
* his daughter applied for college and her counselor discovered he had never transferred the benefit and advised him he needed to be on active duty to transfer benefits

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Orders Number 018-502, issued by the Joint Task Force Headquarters Virgin Islands, Christiansted, Virgin Islands, dated 18 January 2008, show the applicant was honorably discharged on 31 December 2007 and transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3.  Public Law 110-252 establishes legal limitations on the transferability of unused Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits.

     a.  The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve.

     b.  A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of education benefits to his or her dependent (on or after 1 August 2009).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his family members under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was carefully considered.

2.  The applicant was neither on active duty nor in the Selected Reserve at the time this program was implemented.  By law, he is not eligible.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013167



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013167



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013168

    Original file (20130013168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. The law requires a member to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019598

    Original file (20140019598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After applying for retirement after 20 years of active service in early 2009, he received an approved retirement date of 1 September 2009, during which time the Post-9/11 GI Bill was being launched. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005370

    Original file (20130005370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005799

    Original file (20130005799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 30 September 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015550

    Original file (20140015550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 12 September 2009. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he made a timely application to transfer at least 1 month of his unused education benefits to his eligible dependents, in accordance with the TEB provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020978

    Original file (20120020978.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOD policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013606

    Original file (20140013606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's two sons each used education benefits the applicant transferred to them under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer her educational benefits to her dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to her retirement. She incurred an additional service obligation as a result of her approved request to transfer her education benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021656

    Original file (20110021656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his educational benefits to eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003345

    Original file (20140003345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his dependent(s) under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from active duty. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012606

    Original file (20140012606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer education benefits to his dependent child under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant requests that he be allowed to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependent son. Since there is no evidence that shows the applicant attempted to transfer the benefit while in an active status, as required by...