Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013168
Original file (20130013168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  3 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013168 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to her family members under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states she retired out of the Virgin Islands Army National Guard (ARNG) and was never given a retirement briefing.  She was unaware that the Post 9/11 MGIB is transferrable and therefore was never given the opportunity to complete the necessary documentation.  She was told by a counselor that since she did not know anything about this program, she could submit an appeal. 

3.  The applicant does not provide any evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  She enlisted in the ARNG on 16 October 1985.  She served through multiple extensions or reenlistments and she attained the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.

3.  She was honorably discharged from the ARNG on 20 September 2006 and she was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  She completed 20 years, 11 months, and 5 days of total service for retired pay. 

4.  On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute, or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

5.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy that identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.  The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009.  However, the policy does apply to those so retired if they are recalled to active duty and serve on or after 1 August 2009 and before 2 August 2012.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the ARNG from 16 October 1985 to 20 September 2006.  The law requires a member to be on active duty or in the Selected 

Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 at the time he/she requests the transfer.  The applicant was neither on active duty nor in the Selected Reserve at the time this program was implemented.  Therefore, she is not eligible to transfer her education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to her family members.

2.  The applicant's service and her sincerity are not in question.  However, the requirements of this program are set in the law and any changes to this law are not within the purview of this Board.  There is neither an error nor an injustice in her case and as such, she is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013168





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013168



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002505

    Original file (20140002505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was retired from active duty on 31 August 2009, which is within 90 days of the implementation of the program. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct her records to show she applied to transfer her educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program upon implementation of the program. As a result, the Board recommends that all State National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009565

    Original file (20120009565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 23 years of service upon his separation from the ARNG; furthermore, he was not eligible to transfer benefits to dependent because the law requires Soldiers to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. a. If the applicant had been in the Selected Reserve or on active duty on 1 August 2009, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation, but he was not eligible because he was not on active duty and left the ARNG prior to 1 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008133

    Original file (20120008133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant in this case had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer the benefit because the law requires Soldiers to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. If the applicant had been in the service on or after 1 August 2009 he would not have incurred an additional service obligation but he left service prior to 1 August 2009. e. A Soldier must have no adverse action flag and have an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014094

    Original file (20140014094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 2014, he was informed by Mr. T____ E____, VA Education Services, that the application for the TEB option should have been offered to him prior to separation from the service. However, this was the first time he learned there was a requirement to be approved for TEB prior to separation from the service and this option should have been offered to him upon his release from the NCARNG and at the time of retirement. He is asking that the Board correct his records to show he requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015351

    Original file (20140015351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The program to transfer education benefits to family members under TEB did not exist when he was released from active duty in 2004. The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019129

    Original file (20110019129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, but she was not eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children because the law requires the Soldier to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019878

    Original file (20110019878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve so he can transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. The official stated the applicant's last day of service with the ARNG was 31 August 2010 but he did not transfer his benefit prior to this date. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010131

    Original file (20140010131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 limits the eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve. On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members. The applicant was eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no evidence he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001405

    Original file (20130001405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant was not serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006399

    Original file (20120006399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 22 years of service upon her transfer to the Retired Reserve, so she was eligible to transfer to either spouse or children (if she completed the request before leaving military service). c. a Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible family members. Those who retired on or after 1 August 2009, by law, were eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits providing he or she requested to transfer TEB prior to the day of retirement or transfer to the...