BOARD DATE: 10 March 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140012606 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer education benefits to his dependent child under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 2. He states he applied for his son to receive the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in 2009 while he was serving in Iraq. He retired on 2 June 2011 and thought the issue was resolved. He went to the milConnect website and saw that his son was ineligible when he tried to transfer his benefits. He believes this issue was based on a glitch in the new website that did not recognize his son as the beneficiary of his entitlements. 3. He provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. Having prior service in both the Army National Guard and the Regular Army, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 16 September 2002. He served in Iraq from 23 February to 23 December 2009. The highest rank/grade he attained was staff sergeant/E-6. 3. On 9 July 2009, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command issued him a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter). This letter notified him that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. 4. On 1 May 2011, he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. His AHRC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) shows he completed 21 years, 10 months, and 25 days of qualifying service for Reserve retirement. 5. A review of his records reveals no evidence and he does not provide evidence that shows he transferred, or attempted to transfer, his education benefits to his son in accordance with the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 6. Public Law 110-252 established legal limitations on the transferability of unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. a. A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her dependent (on or after 1 August 2009). The applicant's last day in military service was 30 November 2011. b. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. To be considered an eligible dependent, the spouse or child must be enrolled in the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS) and be eligible for DEERS benefits. Children lose eligible dependent status upon turning age 21 or at marriage. Eligible dependent status can be extended from age 21 to age 23 only if the child is enrolled as a full-time student and unmarried (verified by DEERS). Wards of State are not eligible for the benefits. Once the benefits are transferred, children may use the benefits up to age 26. d. A Soldier must also agree to serve the prescribed additional service obligation based on the time the Soldier had in service on 1 August 2009. e. A Soldier must have no adverse action flag and have an honorable discharge to transfer the benefits. There is no evidence of an adverse action in the applicant's record. He received an honorable discharge. f. A Soldier should not be granted relief based on unawareness of the law, program rules, or procedures unless he or she left the service during the implementation phase (first 90 days) of the program. The Army, Department of Defense (DOD), and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits. g. A Soldier must initially request to transfer benefits on the DOD TEB online database. The TEB online database was operational 29 June 2009. Once approved in the TEB online database by the Soldier's service, the approval information is automatically relayed for VA access. The respective dependent must then submit an application for VA educational benefits, VA Form 22-1990e, to request to use the benefits. h. Changes to the number of months allocated to dependents can be made at anytime, to include once a member leaves military service, provided the service member allocates at least 1 month of benefits prior to separation. If the service member allocates 0 months and subsequently leaves military service, he or she is not authorized to transfer unused benefits. 7. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members. The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or b. has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or c. is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. 8. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. 9. On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy which identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant requests that he be allowed to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependent son. He maintains that he applied to transfer his benefits while serving in Iraq, but due to a glitch in the new website, his son was not recognized as the beneficiary of his entitlements. 2. There is no evidence and he did not provide any evidence which shows he attempted to transfer his educational benefits to his dependent prior to his separation. Notwithstanding his sincerity, DOD, the VA, and the Army conducted a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues. The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria. While there may have been some confusion during the early stages after the implementation, the applicant retired on 1 May 2011, almost 2 years after the program was implemented. 3. The requirement to transfer the benefit while a member is on active duty or in the Selected Reserve is embedded in the law and a change to this law is not within the purview of this Board. Since there is no evidence that shows the applicant attempted to transfer the benefit while in an active status, as required by law, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting his requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X_____ ___X_____ ___X__ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140012606 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140012606 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1