Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012762
Original file (20130012762.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012762


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he completed 28 years, 11 months, and 4 days of service for percentage purposes under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), section 1405 (10 USC § 1405), referred to as "1405 service."
2.  The applicant states: 

* the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) has his official retirement orders from 2002, which show he completed 23 years,               4 months, and 4 days of 1405 service
* HRC now acknowledges he served 5 years and 7 months as a retiree recall, from 1 December 2002 through 1 July 2008
* the two periods of service equal 28 years, 11 months, and 4 days, the total for correction of his 1405 service
* HRC will not provide a reason why it is not honoring the 1405 service stated in his 2002 retirement orders
* he has 2 boxes of military records he believes support his request for correction of his 1405 service
* HRC refuses to make an effort to obtain that information so that it may accurately account for his service
* HRC has come up with 3 different calculations of his 1405 service, the latest increasing his service from 28 years, 3 months, and 13 days to      28 years, 7 months, and 22 days
* this latest calculation does not account for any service during the period from 1979 to 1982 (2 years, 11 months, and 11 days), despite evidence to the contrary
* HRC still cannot accurately determine his correct amount of 1405 service
* certain Army entities that were previously responsible for service accountability no longer exist; therefore, HRC cannot obtain an accurate accounting of his creditable 1405 service

3.  The applicant provides an Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 6 January 2011, and a copy of an email string between himself and members of HRC, bearing the title "Service Computation." 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant has benefitted from several re-computations of his               1405 service, which were completed by HRC on 26 August 2002, 9 January 2009, 1 December 2009, 3 July 2012, and 26 February 2013.  

2.  Additionally, he has petitioned the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on two previous occasions in an effort to obtain a more favorable result vis-à-vis the calculation of his 1405 service.  These cases were promulgated under Docket Number AR20080017893 on 24 September 2009 and Docket Number AR20120002390 (administratively closed) on 5 December 2012.

3.  On 17 June 1969, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army.  His record shows he served in the Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) Corps.

4.  He served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) throughout his career, in positions of increased responsibility, including extended periods of active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program.  On or about 12 June 1995, he was promoted to the rank/grade of colonel (COL)/O-6.

5.  On 26 August 2002, in preparation for his upcoming active federal service (AFS) retirement, a    DA Form 7301-R was completed by the USAR Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM), which later reorganized HRC.  This form shows:

* he was credited with 21 years, 5 months, and 21 days of AFS
* he was credited with 1 year, 9 months, and 13 days of additional service (retirement points after 1 June 1958) 
* he was credited with 23 years, 4 months, and 4 days of total service for percentage purposes (1405 service) 
6.  Orders P-08-290086, issued by AR-PERSCOM on 26 August 2002, ordered his retirement from active duty effective 30 November 2002, with subsequent placement on the Retired List the following day.  These orders show he was credited with 21 years, 5 months, and 21 days of AFS and 23 years, 4 months, and 4 days of 1405 service.

7.  On 30 November 2002, he was honorably retired from the Army in the rank/grade of COL/O-6.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for this period of active duty is not available for review.

8.  On 1 December 2002, he was recalled to active duty from his retired status and began another period of extended active duty.

9.  On 30 June 2008, he was released from active duty and returned to the USAR Control Group (Army of the United States Retired List).  His                   DD Form 214 for this period shows he was credited with an additional 5 years and 7 months of active Federal service.  

10.  On 19 October 2008, the applicant petitioned the ABCMR, stating his computation of service for retirement purposes was incorrectly computed; therefore, he was not being paid his full entitlement.  

11.  The case was promulgated under ABCMR Docket Number AR20080017893, on 24 September 2009, wherein the Board granted the applicant partial relief by directing HRC to thoroughly audit his records, with his participation, to accurately derive his proper 1405 service.

12.  In an effort to accurately capture his 1405 service, HRC completed no less than 5 separate automated Service Computations for Separation.

DATE COMPLETED
TOTAL AFS
TOTAL 1405 SERVICE
9 JANUARY 2009
26 YRS, 4 MOS, 10 DYS
28 YRS, 1 MO, 23 DYS
1 DECEMBER 2009
26 YRS, 6 MOS, 00 DYS
28 YRS, 3 MOS, 13 DYS
3 JULY 2012
26 YRS, 6 MOS, 00 DYS
28 YRS, 3 MOS, 13 DYS
26 FEBRUARY 2013
26 YRS, 10 MOS, 09 DYS
28 YRS, 7 MOS, 22 DYS



13.  10 USC § 1405 (Years of Service) provides general military law vis-à-vis the computation of retired pay.

   a. In General – for the purposes of the computation of the years of service of a member of the armed forces, under a provision of this title providing for such computation to be made under this section, the years of service of the member are computed by adding:

		(1) the Soldier's years of active service;
	
		(2) the years of service, not included in clause (1), with which he was entitled to be credited on 31 May 1958, in computing his basic pay; and

		(3) the years of service, not included in clause (1) or (2), with which he would be entitled to be credited under section 12733 of this title if he were entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title.

   b. Fractional Years of Service — In determining a member’s years of service under subsection(a):

		(1) each full month of service that is in addition to the number of full years of service creditable to the member shall be credited as 1/12 of a year; and

		(2) any remaining fractional part of a month shall be disregarded.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his records to credit him with             28 years, 11 months, and 4 days of 1405 service was carefully considered and was determined to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record shows:

* he was credited with 21 years, 5 months, and 21 days of AFS at the time of his retirement in 2002
* he was granted 1 year, 9 months, and 13 days of service based on USAR service while not on active duty
* when totaled together, these two periods equate to 23 years, 3 months, and 4 days



3.  His Officer Service Computation for Retirement, dated 26 August 2002, credits him with 23 years, 4 months, and 4 days of 1405 service on page 1 of the form; however, page 2 of the form shows the same calculation as 23 years,          3 months, and 4 days, which appears to be the more accurate calculation.  
Since his retirement pay calculations have been based, thus far, on the 23 years, 4 months, and 4 days calculation, this figure will continue to be used throughout the remainder of this case.

4.  He served an additional 5 years and 7 months as a retiree recall.  This service is documented on a DD Form 214 and cannot be refuted.

5.  When added together, his two periods of AFS equate to 27 years and
21 days.  This service is documented in various places throughout his record and cannot be refuted.  

6.  When adding his 1 year, 9 months, and 13 days of additional service to his previously-credited AFS, the total 1405 service equates to 28 years, 10 months, and 4 days. 

7.  When adding his additional 5 years and 7 months to his previously-credited 1405 service of 23 years, 4 months, and 4 days, the new total 1405 service equates to 28 years, 11 months, and 4 days.  This figure is consistent with the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by directing HRC to credit him with 28 years, 11 months, and 4 days of 1405 service 

and forwarding this information to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to ensure the applicant's proper total 1405 service is used to compute his retired pay and pay him any back retired pay resulting from this change.



      _____________X____________
      		CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017893



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012762



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078928C070215

    Original file (2002078928C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, there is no prohibition against calculating ORC service on a "year for year" basis since the 10 May 2001 advisory opinion by the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) in Docket Number AR2001056085, dated 27 September 2001, was silent on the applicant's service in the ORC and did not state that " year for year ORC was specifically excluded by statute." Evidence of record shows that the applicant received credit for attendance at only 38 drill periods and 15 days of annual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056085C070420

    Original file (2001056085C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The JA stated that in his opinion, Medical Corps officers who served prior to 1981, in the Organized Reserve Corps (Now Army Reserve) were entitled to year-for-year credit for their service. The JA also stated that under Title 10, USC, section 1405 (1980), years of service did not appear to include service in the Army Reserve. It was determined that the applicant was entitled to 5 years of constructive service credit for medical school/internship, which was for computation of basic pay and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009638

    Original file (20100009638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The full relief granted in Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR 20090010275 was based on active duty service that was completed under Title 10, USC, section 1405 as a CPT, O-3. In his 25 January 2010 letter addressed to HRC-STL, he stated: * That his correct advancement date on the retired list should be 25 November 2008 * His retirement date was 30 September 2005 * His retirement orders showed he had completed 26 years, 10 months, and 4 days of service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008058

    Original file (20140008058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provided a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 June 2008 [TAB P], which shows she was retired from active duty on 30 June 2008 after completing 1 year and 11 days net active service this period. The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued Orders 142-0001, dated 21 May 2008, published by the U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Belvoir, VA, retiring her on 30 June 2008 and placing her on the retired list on the following date, in the rank of LTC. Since her service computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014180

    Original file (20100014180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This time accounts for his first period of Regular Army active service and his 42 days of active service while in the Reserve components. A letter, dated 27 July 2010, from DFAS to a Member of Congress states, in pertinent part, the applicant's military records reflect he has 29 years, 3 months, and 11 days for his service base pay; the Department of the Army retired the applicant with 24 years, 4 months, and 26 days of total active service (service percent multiplier); and the service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021569

    Original file (20120021569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the DA Form 1506 (Service Computation for Separation) to add 5 years of constructive service credit. It is lacking the five (5) years of "constructive service for Medical Corps/Dental Corps (MC/DC)" that he should have been given (4 years for his medical school and 1 year for his internship) because his commission as a medical officer date of 9 June 1969 is prior to the 15 September 1981 date cited in Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 06-066, dated 7...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802842

    Original file (9802842.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 December 1997, the MPF provided a retirement estimate of $1,483 per month to the applicant. They produced a retirement pay estimate of $1,391, a difference of $7 from the applicant’s actual retired pay. At the time the applicant was considering retirement, the MPF provided him with an estimate of his retirement pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000059

    Original file (20100000059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion, in essence, recommended that the applicant's retirement order Number 068-0004, dated 9 March 2009, be amended to correctly reflect his total years of service in the MA ARNG [section 1405]. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to credit him with all of his Massachusetts Army National Guard (MA ARNG) service. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009708

    Original file (20080009708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant is confusing the service (i.e., 26 years, 4 months, and 12 days as shown on his corrected Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) he would have been credited with had he retired with an enlisted Reserve retirement at age 60 with the service he was eligible to be credited with as a commissioned officer who retired from active duty. For example, had the applicant retired with an enlisted Reserve retirement or even with an enlisted active duty retirement, all of his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055419C070420

    Original file (2001055419C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 9 July 1974; two NGB Forms (Report of Separation and Record of Service) with effective dates of 9 April 1978 and 31 October 1975; a Retirement Credits Record; and a DD Form 214 with an effective date of 30 April 1997. His records contain a DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement), dated 18 February 1997, which shows the applicant’s total active service...