IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 11 March 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130011759
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge and reinstatement of his E-4 grade.
2. The applicant states he made every attempt to fulfill his obligations. The unit he was attached to failed to communicate with him and refused to respond to his requests for transfers. He was ultimately discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and received the same discharge as violent criminals and drug addicts receive. He wants an opportunity to continue his service but he cannot do so with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
3. The applicant does not provide any evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the USAR for 8 years on 13 November 2007. He appears to have been assigned to the 344th Combat Support Hospital, Fort Dix, NJ.
2. He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 3 January 2008 and completed required training for military occupational specialty 68M (Nutrition Care Specialist). He was released from ADT to the control of his USAR unit on 22 October 2008.
3. The complete facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available for review with this case. However, it appears he was assigned to the 320th Combat Support Hospital, Greensborough, NC. His records contain an involuntary separation checklist, dated 1 August 2012, that shows his commander recommended his discharge in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 13, as an unsatisfactory participant, with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The checklist has a check mark next to the notification memorandum, election of rights, counseling statements, and chain of command's recommendations.
4. On 25 August 2012, the Commanding General, 3rd Medical Command (Deployment Support), Fort Gillem, GA, indicated he reviewed the separation packet and found the applicant did not possess the potential for useful service. He ordered him discharged with the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.
5. On 4 September 2012, Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Fort Jackson, SC, published Orders 12-248-00028:
a. reducing the applicant from specialist (SPC)/E-4 to private/E-1, effective 4 September 2012, in accordance with paragraph 10-15 of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions); and
b. discharging the applicant from the USAR effective 9 September 2012 in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178 with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service.
6. On 15 March 2013, the Army Discharge Review Board reviewed his discharge and found it proper and equitable. Accordingly, it denied his petition for a change in the character and/or reason for his discharge.
7. Army Regulation 135-178 sets policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard (ARNG) and USAR enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. Chapter 13 of this regulation states a Soldier is subject to discharge for unsatisfactory participation when it is determined that the Soldier is unqualified for further military service because the Soldier is an unsatisfactory participant and attempts to have the Soldier respond or comply with orders or correspondence have resulted in:
* the Soldiers refusal to comply with orders or correspondence
* A notice sent by certified mail was refused, unclaimed, or otherwise undeliverable
* Verification that the Soldier has failed to notify the command of a change of address and reasonable attempts to contact the Soldier have failed
* Discharge action may be taken when the Soldier cannot be located or is absent in the hands of civil authorities in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 218 and chapter 3, section IV, of this regulation
8. Army Regulation 600-8-19 prescribes the enlisted promotions and reductions function of the military personnel system. Paragraph 10-15 (Approved discharge from the service under other than honorable conditions) states when the separation authority determines that a Soldier is to be discharged from the Service under other than honorable conditions, the Soldier will be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. Further board action is not required for this reduction.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants record is void of the complete facts and circumstances that led to his discharge. However, the available records show the applicant's immediate commander initiated separation action against him for unsatisfactory participation. The separation authority reviewed the separation packet and found the applicant did not possess the potential for useful service. He ordered him discharged with the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. His records contain a discharge and reduction order that shows he was reduced on 4 September 2012 and discharged from the USAR on 9 September 2012.
2. Without evidence to the contrary, the presumption of regularity prevails. It is presumed his chain of command initiated separation action against him. It is also presumed his separation action was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations and there is no indication of procedural errors that would have jeopardized his rights. The discharge proceedings were presumably conducted in accordance with applicable law and regulations at the time and the character of his service is commensurate with his overall record of military service. The reason for discharge and the characterization of service both are presumed to be proper and equitable.
3. When the separation authority determines that a Soldier is to be discharged from the Service under other than honorable conditions, the Soldier will be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. Further board action is not required for this reduction. This is the case here. The applicant was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. His reduction was required.
4. There is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130011759
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130011759
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012467
The evidence of record shows that on 29 February 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies (111105-120205) within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for her absences, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains documentation that shows the unit contacted the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012670
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on 31 January 2008, for a period of 8 years. The evidence of record shows that on 14 April 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for his absences, with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140001742
The evidence of record shows that on 5 June 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 scheduled IDT within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for his absences, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, at the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018207
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Orders 11-096-00021, issued by Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Fort Jackson, SC, dated 6 April 2011: a. reduced the FSM from SFC/E-7 to private (PVT/E-1) effective 6 April 2011 under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 10-15; and b. discharged the FSM from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002891
Army Regulation 600-8-19 provides for the promotion and reduction of enlisted personnel. He has provided no evidence to show he was reduced or discharged in error. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150003025
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant was transferred to the US Army Reserve Control Group (REINF) on 21 August 2007, upon his ETS from active duty to complete the remainder of his 8-year military service obligation (MSO) from 22 May 2003 to 21 May 2011. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided discharge orders that are under current review. However, at the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007251
BOARD DATE: 11 October 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120007251 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 10-15 (Other Reasons for Reduction) states that when the separation authority determines that a Soldier is to be discharged from the service under other than honorable conditions, the Soldier will be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. The applicant contends that her discharge for unsatisfactory "performance"...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130017317
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 3 March 2013 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Unsatisfactory Participation, AR 135-178, Chapter 13 e. Unit of assignment: 387 Medical Logistics Company, Miami, FL f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 24 January 2007/8 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 6 years, 1 month, 9 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 2 months, 11 days i. On 17 December 2012, the commander notified the applicant of the initiation of separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007334
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 9 April 2010, for 8 years. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the document and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The records show the proper discharge and separation authority procedures were followed in this case and an under other than honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006429
The applicant provides copies of: * Congressional correspondence * letter from debt collection agency * Birth Certificates for two children * checklist for discharge for Failure to Obtain an FCP * DA Form 5304 (FCP Counseling Checklist), dated 10 July 2011 * DA Forms 4856 (Developmental Counseling Statements), dated 23 September and 23 October 2011 * memorandum notifying her the unit commander was initiating separation action against her for failing to obtain an FCP with her...