Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002891
Original file (20110002891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110002891 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his under other than honorable conditions discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be revoked and:

* reinstatement of his rank/grade to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6
* transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)

2.  The applicant states he had transportation problems and could no longer make drills.  He asked to be placed in the IRR or find a unit in Florida.

3.  The applicant provides a notarized statement regarding his car trouble.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior service in the Regular Army, the applicant enlisted in the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 for 6 years on 30 November 1993 and held military occupational specialty 31U (Signal Support Systems Specialist).

2.  On 11 September 1994, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice foe absenting himself from his scheduled multiple unit training assemblies (MUTA).  

3.  He was released from the FLARNG as an unsatisfactory participant on 1 March 1997 after having been reduced to private first class/E-3.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).
4.  He entered active duty from the USAR on 27 January 2003 and he was honorably released from active duty on 6 January 2004.  He was later reassigned to the 3rd Battalion, 108th Regiment, Augusta, GA, and he was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 8 January 2006.

5.  The complete facts and circumstances of his discharge from the USAR are not available for review with this case.  However, his records contain Orders    10-321-00044, issued by Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, on 17 November 2010 that:

	a.  Ordered his reduction from SSG/E-6 to private/E-1, effective 17 November 2010, in accordance with paragraph 1-15 of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotion and Reductions).

	b.  Ordered him discharged from the USAR effective 22 November 2010 in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) with an under other than honorable conditions character of service.

6.  His Army Reserve Personnel Command Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) shows he completed a total of 15 years, 8 months, and 1 day of qualifying service for non-regular retirement.

7.  He provides a notarized statement, dated 21 December 2010, describing his car trouble. 

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 provides for the promotion and reduction of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 1-15 states when the separation authority determines that a Soldier is to be discharged from the Service under other than honorable conditions, the Soldier will be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. Further board action is not required for this reduction. 

9.  Army Regulation 135-178 establishes policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative separation of certain enlisted Soldiers of the Army National Guard of the United States and the USAR.  A Soldier is subject to discharge for unsatisfactory participation when it is determined that the Soldier is unqualified for further military service because: the Soldier is an unsatisfactory participant, attempts to have the Soldier respond or comply with orders or correspondence have resulted in the Soldier's refusal to comply with orders or correspondence, a notice sent by certified mail was refused, unclaimed, or otherwise undeliverable, or verification that the Soldier has failed to notify the command of a change of address and reasonable attempts to contact the Soldier have failed.  Discharge action may be taken when the Soldier cannot be located or is absent in the hands of civil authorities.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his records contain a duly-constituted order that ordered his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade and discharge with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. 

2.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that his reduction and discharge were in accordance with applicable regulation.  He has provided no evidence to show he was reduced or discharged in error.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002891





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002891



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077230C070215

    Original file (2002077230C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was also informed that he would receive a written counseling statement every 90 days for the next year. On 13 November 1998, the applicant extended his period of service for 3 years; thereby establishing 17 November 2001 as his new expiration of term of service (ETS) date. On 27 September 1999, the applicant’s unit commander requested that the applicant be reduced from SSG/E-6 to SGT/E-5 for inefficiency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018207

    Original file (20120018207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Orders 11-096-00021, issued by Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Fort Jackson, SC, dated 6 April 2011: a. reduced the FSM from SFC/E-7 to private (PVT/E-1) effective 6 April 2011 under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 10-15; and b. discharged the FSM from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020048

    Original file (20140020048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 January 1988, the OKARNG published Orders 19-14 discharging the applicant from the OKARNG with an under honorable conditions discharge, effective 8 February 1988 and transferring him to the USAR Control Group (IRR), in accordance with paragraph 8-27g of NGR 600-200. On 5 August 1989, Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 377th Infantry Regiment, published Orders 08-01 reducing the applicant from SP4/E-4 to private first class (PFC)/E-3 effective 5 August 1989 in accordance with Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000768

    Original file (20130000768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to a general discharge under honorable conditions. On 23 March 2012, he submitted a request for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB). The evidence shows he did not do so and he admits he did not attend training due to the lack of transportation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014308

    Original file (20080014308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reduction Orders Number 004-001, dated 22 April 1994, and his reassignment Orders Numbers 025-008, for unsatisfactory participation, dated 10 May 1994, be removed from his OMPF (Official Military Personnel File). The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 February 1992, for 8 years. Army Regulation 140-158 prescribes policies and procedures pertaining to the classification, promotion, reduction, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007478

    Original file (20060007478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that following her relocation to Georgia in 2001 she attempted to get a different TPU (Troop Program Unit) assignment but was unable to do so. All of the correspondence and orders issued during this period list her rank as a SGT and was sent to addresses in Mississippi. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), paragraph 4-15 (Involuntary reassignment for unsatisfactory participation) states that a TPU Soldier who has...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130017317

    Original file (AR20130017317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 3 March 2013 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Unsatisfactory Participation, AR 135-178, Chapter 13 e. Unit of assignment: 387 Medical Logistics Company, Miami, FL f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 24 January 2007/8 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 6 years, 1 month, 9 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 2 months, 11 days i. On 17 December 2012, the commander notified the applicant of the initiation of separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075494C070403

    Original file (2002075494C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The board recommended that...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001266

    Original file (AR20130001266.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 11September 2001 for 8 years. The available evidence in the record indicates that on 27 May 2010, DA, HQS, 88th Regional Support Command, Fort McCoy, WI, Orders number 10-147-00050, discharged the applicant from the U.S Army Reserve, effective 27 May 2010, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014510

    Original file (20090014510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 November 2008, the FLARNG also published Orders 317-081 directing the applicant's discharge from the 3rd Battalion, 116th Field Artillery, and transferring him to the 3116th Forward Support Company, FLARNG, effective 12 November 2008. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was absent from UTA's from 7 November 2008 to 9 November 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Form...