Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010179
Original file (20130010179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  6 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010179 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was not properly informed of the opportunity to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlements to his spouse or dependents
* this entitlement would have influenced his decision to serve beyond the entitlement requirements

3.  The applicant provides:

* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Certificate of Eligibility
* two memoranda of endorsement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After completing over 20 years of creditable active service, the applicant retired from the Regular Army on 31 October 2006 in the rank of lieutenant colonel.

3.  He provided a VA Certificate of Eligibility, dated 20 February 2013, which shows he is entitled to educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

4.  He also provided two memoranda from a colonel and major general who endorse a waiver for transferability of the Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlement for the applicant.

	a.  In a memorandum, dated 7 May 2013, the colonel attests:

* the applicant was not properly informed of the opportunity to transfer educational benefits to his spouse or dependents
* he served as an active duty Army officer for more than 20 years
* when he retired from the Army in 2006 the Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlements did not exist
* he was later granted Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlements for himself, but was not granted transferability to his spouse or dependents
* he was not properly informed of the future opportunity to transfer this benefit to his dependents

	b.  In a memorandum, dated 16 May 2013, the major general attests:

* the applicant served in an exemplary manner as his executive officer and with distinction as an active duty Army officer for more than 20 years
* he understands the statute creating the Post-9/11 GI Bill requires a transfer of the benefit while the service member is actively in the Armed Forces
* the decision to approve or deny such requests is solely within the purview of the Secretary of Defense, and the VA determines eligibility for transferred Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits based on information provided by the Department of Defense (DOD)
* the applicant is deserving of this benefit

5.  On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

6.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

7.  DOD, the Army, and the VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contentions and endorsements were carefully considered.  However, since he retired on 31 October 2006, almost 3 years prior to implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program, he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the program to his dependents by law.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices he made in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ____________x_____________
       	      CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010179



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010179



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008312

    Original file (20140008312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval to transfer the remaining balance of his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000223

    Original file (20150000223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * there is not much he can give his children who followed him during their growing-up years and had to be uprooted during high school because he was again being transferred * receiving the educational benefits is one small way he can demonstrate his appreciation for the sacrifices they made during his career * he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents at the time it was first authorized in June 2009 because he already had a master's degree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014187

    Original file (20110014187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence he was ever eligible to transfer his Montgomery GI Bill benefits. It appears the applicant was eligible to convert his Montgomery GI Bill benefits to the Post 9/11 GI Bill while he was still on active duty. The applicant would have been eligible to transfer any Post-9/11 GI Bill benefit to either his spouse or children, if he had converted his Montgomery GI Bill benefits to the Post 9/11 GI Bill while he was still on active duty and then transferred it to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014366

    Original file (20140014366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but did not do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002773

    Original file (20120002773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 16 years of service as of the program’s implementation date of 1 August 2009; therefore, he was eligible to transfer to either his spouse or his children. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. The applicant did not and could not have requested a transfer of his benefits to his dependents on 3 June 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011764

    Original file (20140011764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008109

    Original file (20120008109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his spouse under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant states he was never informed nor was he aware that the Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits had to be transferred while still in service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001056

    Original file (20150001056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval to transfer his educational benefits under the provisions of the Post-9/11 Transfer of Benefits (TEB) program to his dependents. Even if he had gotten out of the Army with an approved transfer request, the service obligation would have precluded his dependents from being approved for the benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Also, he was advised that the Post-9/11 GI Bill is still his to use; however, his dependents are not eligible to use...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009399

    Original file (20140009399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her dependent on or after 1 August 2009. b. c. A Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible family members. The applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his family members under the TEB provision of the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve while he was still a member of the Selected Reserve, but there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012277

    Original file (20130012277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits to an additional dependent under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. His record is void of evidence showing he designated additional dependents to receive transferred benefits prior to retirement and he does not provide such evidence. The evidence of record shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program prior to his retirement.