Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011764
Original file (20140011764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  19 March 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011764 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to transfer his education benefits to his spouse and dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states that: 

* he was not aware until recently that the Post 9/11 GI Bill included the ability to transfer benefits to his spouse and dependent
* he was not aware that the transfer had to be approved while he was still a member of the Armed Forces 
* as a Reservist, he did not receive any Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) counseling from his command prior to his retirement

3.  The applicant submitted:

* two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 
* his VA Certificate of Eligibility
* Orders PO4-905009, dated 22 April 2009

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served in the Regular Army, Army National Guard, and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  On 27 October 2009, he was placed on the Army of the United States (AUS) Retired List.  A review of his record shows that prior to being placed on the AUS Retired List he had been serving as a member of a USAR unit.  He completed 33 years, 11 months, and 29 days of service qualifying for non-regular retirement.  

3.  He submitted, in part, a Certificate of Eligibility, dated 17 April 2013, which states he is entitled to benefits for an approved program of education or training under the Post 9/11 GI Bill.  

4.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 may transfer benefits if, at the time of the approval of the request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, the member is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  (A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.)

5.  The Army, DOD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and transfer of education benefits.  However, during the first 90 days of the program, many Soldiers did not receive information on the requirements of the program.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was placed on the AUS Retired List on 27 October 2009 after completing over 30 years of service qualifying for retired pay.  He retired within 90 days of implementation of the program authorizing transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.  Because he retired before information on the requirements of the program had been thoroughly disseminated, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he submitted a timely request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to 
transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011764



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011764



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019598

    Original file (20140019598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After applying for retirement after 20 years of active service in early 2009, he received an approved retirement date of 1 September 2009, during which time the Post-9/11 GI Bill was being launched. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000669

    Original file (20120000669.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant retired on 31 August 2009, within 90 days of the implementation of the program authorizing transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. In view of the available evidence and the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct her record to show she submitted a timely request to transfer her Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependents prior to her retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011846

    Original file (20140011846.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his educational benefits to his dependent children under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. The correspondence states only those veterans who actually retired or were on documented transition leave with an effective separation date from 2 August 2009 to 1 November 2009 would be favorably considered for transferability of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010951

    Original file (20120010951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he applied to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010087

    Original file (20140010087.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the TEB provision of the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006437

    Original file (20140006437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. When he requested retirement from the Army National Guard (ARNG) in July 2009 for an effective date in October 2009, he never received information or notification during this period that effective August 2009 the benefits of the GI Bill could be transferred to his dependents. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024501

    Original file (20110024501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. after two years of collective effort to correct his record, he submits new evidence not previously seen by the Board confirming the Secretary of the Army's responsibilities regarding the transfer of his Post 9/11 GI Bill Education benefits and the injustice incurred by not fulfilling this responsibility; b. the Directive Type Memorandum (DTM) states the Department of the Army had the responsibility and requirement to provide individual pre-separation or release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010959

    Original file (20140010959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 3 September 2009 after completing more than 21 years of service. Based on the foregoing and as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he transferred his benefits to his dependent under the Transfer of Education Benefits provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009431

    Original file (20120009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Army National Guard (ARNG) did not properly inform him during the time of his retirement that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement from the ARNG. The advisory official stated the applicant was eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; however, he did not complete a request to transfer benefit on the Department of Defense's (DOD's) TEB online database before he left the service. Contrary to the basis for the approval...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001986

    Original file (20140001986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a Department of Defense (DOD) Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) document, dated 14 September 2009, which shows he listed his wife and two dependents under the Educational Benefit Program and this request was approved. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his military records to show he elected to transfer educational benefits to his eligible family members under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision prior to his retirement date on 31 July 2012. ...