Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010062
Original file (20130010062.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  4 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010062 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all authorized awards, specifically those pertaining to the Berlin Crisis and the Cuban Missile Crisis.

2.  The applicant states he is seeking health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs and was informed that he should have been awarded several medals because of his extension in support of the Berlin Crisis and the Cuban Missile Crisis.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was appointed as second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve on 28 August 1959 and he was ordered to active duty on 8 January 1960.

3.  His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows in:

* item 17 (Foreign Service) – no entry
* item 21 (Awards and Decorations) – no entry
* item 22 (Campaigns) – no entry

4.  On 20 April 1962, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of first lieutenant and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).

5.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "none."

6.  Item 12c (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 0 years, 0 months, and 0 days of foreign service.

7.  There is no evidence in his military records that shows he performed duties and/or was recommended/awarded any award for duties performed in support of the Berlin Crisis and the Cuban Missile Crisis.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show all authorized awards was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  His records show he served during a period of eligibility for award of the National Defense Service Medal.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  A thorough review did not reveal any additional awards as a result of foreign service in support of the Berlin Crisis and the Cuban Missile Crisis.  Absent evidence which shows entitlement to any such award, there is no basis to grant the relief requested.

4.  The ABCMR does not amend and/or correct military records solely for the purpose of making an applicant eligible for veterans' medical benefits.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the NDSM to item 26 of his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the awards pertaining to service in support of the Berlin Crisis and the Cuban Missile Crisis.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010062



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010062



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079245C070215

    Original file (2002079245C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show he served during the Berlin and Cuban Missile Crisis. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record confirms that the Item 24c (Foreign Service) of the applicant’s 13 July 1962 separation document accurately reflected the foreign service he completed in Germany.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015901C080407

    Original file (20070015901C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the period of the applicant's honorable active duty service entitles him to the NDSM, and that his service in Korea between 1962 and 1963 entitles him to the KDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 26 June 1963 DD Form 214 by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02881

    Original file (BC-2005-02881.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and a response from the Air Force Historical Studies Office concerning the AFEM, and a fact sheet on the AFEM. The applicant was in the Air Force during this time period, but there is no documentation in the record to substantiate that he participated in direct support of either operation. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011658

    Original file (20120011658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is authorized for 30 consecutive days of service at a normal post of duty service in Berlin between 9 May 1945 and 2 October 1990. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011658 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011658 2 ARMY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00468

    Original file (BC-2005-00468.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 00468 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUGUST 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Good Conduct Medal (GCM). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006871

    Original file (20080006871.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show he served during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013808

    Original file (20110013808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and foreign service credit for the Cuban Missile Crisis. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is awarded for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations of assistance for friendly foreign nations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010705

    Original file (20080010705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested that he be awarded the AFEM, but item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 does not show that he served overseas at any time during his active duty service. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence that he ever served in the designated area of operations of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007886

    Original file (20090007886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not show any evidence that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01555

    Original file (BC-2010-01555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01555 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...