Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009866
Original file (20130009866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009866 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states he was awarded the CIB for combat in support of the forces of the Republic of Vietnam in their struggle against insurgent communist forces.

3.  He provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 
1 July 1964.   
3.  His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in:
	a.  item 22 (Military Occupational Specialty (MOS)) he was awarded primary military occupational specialty (MOS) 64A (Light Vehicle Driver) on 4 August 1964;

	b.  item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 7 August 1965 to 
22 June 1966;

	c.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) while serving in Vietnam he was assigned to the 63d Transportation Company (Light Truck) on 7 August 1965 in duty MOS 64A (light truck driver); and

	d.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the CIB.

4.  On 23 June 1966, he was honorably released from active duty.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 23 days of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show the CIB as an awarded or authorized award.

5.  There are no orders in the available records that show he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

6.  His record is void of evidence which shows he was awarded an infantry MOS or any orders or other documents indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving in Vietnam.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the CIB.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's record shows he was exclusively assigned to a transportation unit in Vietnam in MOS 64A.  There is no evidence he was awarded or held an infantry MOS, that he was serving in an infantry MOS while assigned to a qualifying infantry unit, or that he was personally present and participated with such a qualifying infantry unit while the unit was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ______________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009866





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009866



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008996

    Original file (20090008996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the mother of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her son’s records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There are no orders in the FSM’s personnel records which show he was awarded the CIB. Although the applicant provided a letter from the FSM’s former commanding officer, there are no orders which show the FSM was awarded the CIB or that he met the requirements for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017071

    Original file (20110017071.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * DA Form 1594 (Daily Staff Journal or Duty Officer's Log for 6 June 1967 * a letter, subject: CIB for Bravery, dated 8 June 1967 * a patriotic poem * a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 30 May 2011 * Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant has presented new evidence concerning her request for award of the CIB for her son which requires that this case be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015058C071029

    Original file (20060015058C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015058 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB while serving on active duty. His record is void of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006689

    Original file (20110006689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He arrived in RVN and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division on 18 May 1967 where he performed duties as a light vehicle driver MOS 63B. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman position. _______ _X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015520

    Original file (20100015520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded 11B as his primary MOS when he entered the military. Additionally, his DA Form 20 and orders show he was promoted to SGT/E-5 in MOS 64C, effective 17 November 1969, and it appears he was awarded primary MOS 64C as a result of his promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011082

    Original file (20110011082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009238

    Original file (20110009238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that he was awarded an infantry MOS or that he served in an infantryman position. Evidence of record shows that he was a light truck driver in MOS 64A assigned to a supply and transportation unit in the ROK.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017716

    Original file (20090017716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was issued the CIB, but there is nothing in his records to show this award. During his first period of active duty service, he served in Korea in qualifying infantry units; however, he held and served in MOS 640.00 performing duties as a light truck driver. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012149

    Original file (20100012149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record does not contain orders awarding him the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to enlisted members who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). The evidence of record shows the applicant served in duty MOS 11C while assigned to an infantry unit during his service in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016194

    Original file (20100016194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record and he has not provided any to show he held the MOS 11D as his primary MOS after January 1970. The evidence shows he served in MOS 64B during his tours in Korea and in Vietnam.