Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012149
Original file (20100012149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012149 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states others in his unit were authorized the CIB in a "blanket authorization."  He further states he applied for medals from the National Personnel Records Center and the CIB was not included.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a unit association email list and his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 May 1965 for a period of
3 years.  After completing basic combat and advanced individual training he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64A (Light Vehicle Driver) and assigned to Fort Benning, GA to attend the Basic Airborne Course.  After completing the Basic Airborne Course, he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion (Airborne), 501st Infantry, Fort Campbell, KY.

3.  Special Orders Number 87, issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, Fort Campbell, dated 11 April 1966, show the applicant was reassigned to HHC, 4th Battalion (Airborne), 503d Infantry.  The orders show the applicant was assigned to the unit in MOS 64A.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

	a.  in item 22 (MOS) the applicant held MOS 64A and MOS 64B (Heavy Vehicle Driver);  

	b.  in item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 6 June 1966 to 5 June 1967; and 

	c.  in item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to HHC, 4th Battalion (Airborne), 503d Infantry, and served in duty MOS 11C as an assistant gunner and ammunition bearer while in the RVN.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the DA Form 20 does not show award of the CIB.

6.  A DA Form 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 19 April 1967, shows that on or about 18 April 1967 the applicant failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit:  Mortar Platoon, HHC, 4th Battalion (Airborne), 503d Infantry.

7.  Special Orders Number 117, issued by Headquarters, 173d Airborne Brigade (Separate), dated 27 April 1967, directed the applicant's reassignment to the U.S. Army Vietnam Returnee Detachment for further reassignment to the 5th Infantry Division, Fort Carson, CO.  The orders show his MOS as 64A.

8.  The applicant departed the RVN and was reassigned to Fort Carson on
13 July 1967.  He remained at his duty station until his honorable discharge on 28 May 1968 by reason of expiration of term of service.


9.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the CIB.

10.  The applicant's record does not contain orders awarding him the CIB.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to enlisted members who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have satisfactorily performed duty in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.  Award of the CIB will be announced in orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for award of the CIB.  

2.  The CIB is an individual award.  The fact that numerous Soldiers in a unit were awarded the CIB does not mean that all Soldiers in the unit received the award.  Although it was standard practice during the Vietnam era to award the CIB to multiple Soldiers in one special order, that practice was not equivalent to a "blanket authorization."  A determination of each Soldier's eligibility would have been made by a recommending and approval authority.

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in duty MOS 11C while assigned to an infantry unit during his service in the RVN.  However, the evidence of record does not show, nor has the applicant provided evidence showing, he held an authorized infantry MOS and satisfactorily performed duty in active ground combat.  In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis for awarding him the CIB.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012149



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012149



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011231

    Original file (20130011231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) to show his principal duty as "Mortarman." Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows his duty MOS as 11C1O and his principal duty as "Motorman" while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 4th Battalion, 503d Infantry Regiment, from 18 April 1967 to 10 October 1967. The Record of Proceedings, dated 5 January 2012, shows his MOS as 11C and his principal duty as "Mortarman"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028075

    Original file (20100028075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank/grade as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. On 8 June 1971, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) published Special Orders Number 159 ordering his release from active duty effective 11 June 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004761C070206

    Original file (20050004761C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 NOVEMBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004761 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that he received orders for the CIB in the field in Vietnam but, was not given the award citation and it was not included on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006326

    Original file (20130006326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all his awards including the Presidential Unit Citation and completion of the Combat Tracker Team Course. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments) – service in Vietnam with: * Security Guard Company, USARV; attached to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 2nd Brigade, 4th infantry Division (Re-designated: Army Combat Tracker...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000780

    Original file (20100000780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Army Commendation Medal with first Oak Leaf Cluster and "V" Device (ARCOM 1st OLC with "V" Device). However, he held an infantry MOS, served in three infantry units, and obviously served in combat as evidenced by his ARCOM for valor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100341C070208

    Original file (2004100341C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 September 1966 to 2 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019082

    Original file (20100019082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Parachutist Badge, and any other awards he may be authorized. Records show that the applicant was in three different units at the time they were awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS when first assigned to infantry regiments in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011082

    Original file (20110011082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012186

    Original file (20130012186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and a review of the letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 20 May 2013; his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer of Discharge); and his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214). His DA Form 20 is incorrect in the following particulars: (1) item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) showing the date, 18 April 1969, associated with his secondary military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006689

    Original file (20110006689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He arrived in RVN and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division on 18 May 1967 where he performed duties as a light vehicle driver MOS 63B. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman position. _______ _X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...