Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011082
Original file (20110011082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011082 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he served in Vietnam with Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry.  He participated in ambush patrols, guard duty, and ammunition convoys.  He has post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Progress Notes, dated
21 October 2010

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 30 June 1965.  Following basic combat training (BCT) at Fort Jackson, SC, he was transferred to Fort Sill, OK to attend the Service School Personnel Support Course.

3.  It is unclear whether he completed training at Fort Sill; however he was reassigned to the U.S. Army Missile Officer Candidate School at Fort Sill as a message center clerk.

4.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 16 April 1966 and he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry.  While assigned to this unit he performed in the principal duty as a light vehicle driver in military occupational specialty (MOS) 64A and as a heavy truck driver in MOS 64B.  During his service in Vietnam, he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious achievement.

5.  The applicant departed Vietnam on 8 April 1967 and he was reassigned to Fort Dix, NJ for separation processing.  He was honorably released from active duty on 14 April 1967 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award.

6.  There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the CIB.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that the CIB was the unique award established to 


recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, “the CIB is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.”  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers, to enlisted personnel, and to warrant officers who had an infantry specialty/MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was never trained as a combat infantryman and never held an infantry MOS.  The record shows he worked as a message center clerk, a light vehicle driver, and a heavy truck driver.

2.  There are no orders awarding the applicant the CIB.

3.  All Soldiers are provided basic combat skills training after they enter the Army.  This is provided to ensure that all Soldiers have the survival skills to perform basic infantry missions when the need arises.  The exigencies of combat may require non-infantry Soldiers to temporarily perform the basic infantry duties that all Soldiers are taught, but it is not a basis for the award of the CIB.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

5.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011082



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011082



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000182

    Original file (20140000182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his combat in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he met all of the requirements for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016194

    Original file (20100016194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record and he has not provided any to show he held the MOS 11D as his primary MOS after January 1970. The evidence shows he served in MOS 64B during his tours in Korea and in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015365

    Original file (20080015365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that he served as a combat infantryman in Vietnam and that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that during his first 4 months in Vietnam he was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 173rd Airborne Brigade. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017716

    Original file (20090017716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was issued the CIB, but there is nothing in his records to show this award. During his first period of active duty service, he served in Korea in qualifying infantry units; however, he held and served in MOS 640.00 performing duties as a light truck driver. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006538

    Original file (20110006538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fellow Soldier attests: * he served with the applicant in the Army at Fort Hood, TX, and in Vietnam * he and the applicant served in Troop C, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, 1st Armored Division, at Fort Hood, TX, from approximately January 1967 until their deployment to Vietnam in August 1967 * the applicant functioned and served in the capacity of an armored intelligence specialist in MOS 11D * cavalry troopers assigned to armored cavalry assault vehicles (ACAV's) carried MOS 11B (Light...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012149

    Original file (20100012149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record does not contain orders awarding him the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to enlisted members who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). The evidence of record shows the applicant served in duty MOS 11C while assigned to an infantry unit during his service in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015058C071029

    Original file (20060015058C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015058 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB while serving on active duty. His record is void of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010081

    Original file (20080010081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had served 3 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant has not provided and the records do not contain orders awarding the applicant the CIB for his service in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028075

    Original file (20100028075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank/grade as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. On 8 June 1971, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) published Special Orders Number 159 ordering his release from active duty effective 11 June 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004147C070208

    Original file (20040004147C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contained in his service records, does not show in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence that the applicant served in an infantry MOS in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant's records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.