Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008108
Original file (20130008108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:  31 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008108


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 62E (Heavy Construction Equipment Operator), instead of MOS 94B (Food Service Specialist).

2.  The applicant states:

* his DD Form 214 incorrectly lists his MOS as 94B (Cook)
* he never served as a cook during his period of military service
* his final MOS was 62E
* he requests a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect this corrected MOS 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and Special Orders Number 219, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA on 7 August 1971.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 February 1969.  He entered active duty, completed initial entry training, and was awarded MOS 94B.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 23 March 1970 through on or about 7 August 1971.

4.  Unit Orders Number 78, issued by Company A, 14th Engineer Battalion (Combat) on 15 July 1970, announced his temporary appointment to the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4, effective 15 July 1970, in MOS 94B.  

5.  Special Orders Number 219, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA on 7 August 1971, ordered his relief from active duty.  These orders show his MOS as 62E.

6.  On 7 August 1971, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 94B at the time of his release from active duty.

7.  Item 22 (MOS) of his DA Form 20 shows he held MOS 94B as his primary MOS, which was awarded on 26 September 1969. No secondary MOS or additional MOS is shown.

8.  His record consistently shows his MOS as 94B on various orders and documents throughout his period of military service.  His record is void of orders or other evidence that show he was awarded or held MOS 62E during his period of military service, with the exception of Special Orders Number 219, referenced above.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214, which provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  It states for item 23a, enter PMOS code number and title.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should show he held MOS 62E.

2.  The evidence of record confirms he was awarded MOS 94B upon his completion of initial entry training.  Later, he was promoted in that MOS as well.  

3.  His record is void of any evidence that shows he was properly awarded MOS 62E at any time prior to his separation date.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the evidence suggests he held MOS 94B throughout his period of military service.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 is without error and does not require correction.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008108



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007747

    Original file (20140007747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded MOS 94B (Cook) on or about 27 November 1970. With respect to the rank/grade, the evidence of records shows the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 6 September 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010167

    Original file (20080010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12 (Last Duty of Assignment and Major Command) and Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. His record also confirms that on the date of his REFRAD, he held the PMOS of 94B, as evidenced by orders on file in his MPRJ and an entry on his DA Form 20, and that this PMOS is properly listed in Item 23a of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015689

    Original file (20130015689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 22 (MOS's) the entries: (1) secondary (S), 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), 5 November 1970; and (2) primary (P), 94B, (Cook) 6 September 1971. b. item 27 (Military Education) the entry Light Weapons Infantryman, 11B, Fort Polk, LA, 9 weeks, 1970. c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he served as an 11B Rifleman from 27 January 1971 through 6 September 1971 and as a 94B Cook from 7 September 1971 through 7 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001684

    Original file (20150001684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows in Item 30 (Remarks) that he was a cook in the RVN. A DA Form 20 in which item 22 (MOS) lists his primary MOS as 94B (Cook) with an effective date of 11 September 1970, and a secondary MOS as 11B (Infantryman) with an effective date of 21 October 1971. c. Two DA Forms 2627-1 that show: * he received two Article 15’s in the RVN for sleeping on post and for failing to go to his appointed place of duty for guard formation; he indicates this proves his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005482

    Original file (20140005482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he completed advanced individual training at Fort Sill, OK, for an artillery MOS and served in Vietnam as an artilleryman. On 16 April 1970, Headquarters, Americal Division, published SO Number 106 affecting the following changes effective 4 March 1970: appointing him to the grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 in MOS 94B, withdrawing MOS 13A, and awarding him primary MOS (PMOS)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062850C070421

    Original file (2001062850C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 2 March 1972 to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (automotive maintenance) instead of 94B (cook). He also requests that his date of entry on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 28 November 1968 be corrected to show 22 March 1968 instead of 29 November 1968. Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018144

    Original file (20140018144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows he served in MOS 94B as a cook; however, he never worked in that MOS. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's primary MOS was 94B2O throughout his period of service, but especially at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015287

    Original file (20060015287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments), of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows his principal duties to be those of a cook and first cook, in MOS, 94B20, from 18 December 1965 to 4 July 1967. The evidence shows that the applicant enlisted as a 94B/Cook, that his principle duties were those of a cook, and that he served as cook from 18 December 1965 to 4 July 1967. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013351

    Original file (20100013351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded an infantry MOS. Records show the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service from 28 June 1965 to 28 May 1968 for award of the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007374

    Original file (20090007374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was recommended for and was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for his heroic action on 18 November 1967 and that as an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit in the Republic of Vietnam, he should have received the CIB. Item 32 (Prior Service) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record) shows that on the date of his discharge for the purpose of reenlistment, he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.07 (Infantryman) and was assigned to Company D,...