Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015689
Original file (20130015689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	       6 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015689 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) vice “94N” (i.e., 94B) (Cook).

2.  The applicant states he was never a 94B.

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military service records show he was inducted into the Army  of the United States on 15 July 1970.  He arrived in Vietnam on or about           15 January 1971 and departed on 1 December 1972.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 22 (MOS's) the entries:  

		(1)  secondary (S), 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), 5 November 1970; and  

		(2)  primary (P), 94B, (Cook) 6 September 1971.

	b.  item 27 (Military Education) the entry Light Weapons Infantryman, 11B, Fort Polk, LA, 9 weeks, 1970.

	c.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) he served as an 11B Rifleman from       27 January 1971 through 6 September 1971 and as a 94B Cook from                  7 September 1971 through 7 September 1971.

4.  Special Orders Number 303, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Polk, dated 5 November 1970, show on the date of the orders the applicant was awarded PMOS 11B. 

5.  Special Orders Number 260, issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), dated 17 September 1971, show, effective 6 September 1971,  the applicant was awarded 94B as his SMOS. 

6.  Special Orders Number 266, issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), dated 23 September 1971, show, effective 7 September 1971, the applicant was promoted to specialist four and awarded 94B as his PMOS. 

7.  On 5 July 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his DD Form 214 contains the entry “94N2O Cook.”

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states for enlisted Soldiers list in item 23a the PMOS code number and title.  Also specify the first five characters of the MOS code, which includes the three characters of the MOS, the fourth character of skill and grade level in the MOS, and the fifth character of a special qualification identifier, if applicable.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 9 weeks of training in  the Light Weapons Infantryman course in November 1970 and was awarded PMOS 11B.  Effective 6 September 1971, he was awarded 94B as his SMOS.  However, orders show that on 7 September 1971 94B became his PMOS when he was promoted to specialist four in that MOS.  Therefore, in the absence of documentation to support his claim, item 23a of his DD Form 214 correctly shows his MOS as Cook (although it should be 94B2O, not 94N2O).

2.  Item 23a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his MOS as 94B2O.

3.  However, he served as an 11B in Vietnam for almost 9 months.  It would cause no harm to add in item 30 (Remarks) that he served as an 11B from         15 January 1971 through 6 September 1971.

BOARD VOTE:
________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a. adding in item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry, “Service as an 11B in Vietnam from 15 January 1971 through 6 September 1971”; and

b. amending item 23a of his DD Form 214 to show his MOS as “94B2O Cook.”

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending item 23a of his   DD Form 214 to show his MOS as 11B.  



      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015689





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015689



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007704

    Original file (20140007704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 23 (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United Report of Separation or Discharge). The applicant provides: * Separation Order * Amendment Order * DD Form 214 * EA Form 7 (Individual Training Record) * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was initially trained in and awarded PMOS 11B1O on 1 December 1967 and for most of his military service this was the only MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007747

    Original file (20140007747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded MOS 94B (Cook) on or about 27 November 1970. With respect to the rank/grade, the evidence of records shows the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 6 September 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010167

    Original file (20080010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12 (Last Duty of Assignment and Major Command) and Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. His record also confirms that on the date of his REFRAD, he held the PMOS of 94B, as evidenced by orders on file in his MPRJ and an entry on his DA Form 20, and that this PMOS is properly listed in Item 23a of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005482

    Original file (20140005482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he completed advanced individual training at Fort Sill, OK, for an artillery MOS and served in Vietnam as an artilleryman. On 16 April 1970, Headquarters, Americal Division, published SO Number 106 affecting the following changes effective 4 March 1970: appointing him to the grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 in MOS 94B, withdrawing MOS 13A, and awarding him primary MOS (PMOS)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012913

    Original file (20080012913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 23a (Specialty Number or Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected because he never served as a cook. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing primary MOS 43B2O, Textile Repairman in Item 23a of the applicant’s DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024494

    Original file (20100024494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 27 (Military Schools) shows he successfully completed the 8-week Cook course and he was awarded MOS 94B in 1967. c. Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows he served an overseas tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 January 1968 through 23 January 1969. d. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009247

    Original file (20140009247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he is a Vietnam veteran * he served with the 101st Airborne Division * his BSM is not listed on his DD Form 214 * his secondary MOS (SMOS) of 71B (Clerk-Typist) is on his DD Form 214, but his PMOS of 11B is not listed * he believes that he is entitled to the CIB * there may be other division citations that are not listed on his DD Form 214 3. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008514C070205

    Original file (20060008514C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he earned the MOS of 95B and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that he was a military policeman. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 28 September 1973, the date of his discharge. Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows he served as a military policeman, in MOS 95B4O, from 11 August 1971 to 9 July 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001684

    Original file (20150001684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows in Item 30 (Remarks) that he was a cook in the RVN. A DA Form 20 in which item 22 (MOS) lists his primary MOS as 94B (Cook) with an effective date of 11 September 1970, and a secondary MOS as 11B (Infantryman) with an effective date of 21 October 1971. c. Two DA Forms 2627-1 that show: * he received two Article 15’s in the RVN for sleeping on post and for failing to go to his appointed place of duty for guard formation; he indicates this proves his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080000750

    Original file (AR20080000750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 23a, of his DD Form 214, shows the entry, "91Q2O (Pharmacist)." Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 shows he served as a pharmacist, in MOS 91Q2O. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in MOS 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, with a BS Degree in Pharmacy.