Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006515
Original file (20130006515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130006515 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he graduated from high school and that he was incarcerated in the Federal Penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, KS.

2.  The applicant states he was denied [a diagnosis of] post-traumatic stress disorder because his records do not show he was put in any stressful situation(s) while he was in the military.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), prepared by him on 6 September 1972, shows in item 9 (Education) that he attended DuVal Senior High School in Glenn Dale, MD, from 1969 to 1972, and he indicated with an "X" in the "No" column that he did not graduate.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 1972 for a period of 3 years.

4.  A U.S. Disciplinary Barracks (USDB) Form 129 (Education Classification Data), dated 19 December 1973, shows a vocational counselor indicated that the applicant claimed completion of the 11th grade and last attended DuVal High School, Glenn Dale, MD in 1972.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  item 32 (Civilian Education), he completed the 11th Grade at DuVal Senior High School, Glenn Dale, MD, in 1972; and

   b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was a prisoner at the Correctional Holding Detachment (CHD), USDB, Fort Leavenworth, KS, from 4 December 1973 through 14 February 1974.

6.  Headquarters, Fort George G. Meade (FGGM), MD, Special Court-Martial Order Number 3, dated 27 January 1976, shows the applicant was assigned to Company B, U.S. Army (USA) Personnel Control Facility (PCF), FGGM, MD, at the time the findings of guilty and sentence were set aside and the charges dismissed.

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he entered active duty on 4 October 1972 and he was discharged under honorable conditions on 3 February 1976.  He completed 3 years, 3 months, and 16 days of net active service this period.  It also shows in:

   a.  item 11 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command):  Company B, 
USA PCF, FGGM, MD (U.S. Army Forces Command); and

   b.  item 20 (Highest Education Level Successfully Completed - In Years), Secondary/High School:  "11" Years (1-12 Grades), College:  "0" Years.

8.  A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he completed/graduated from high school or that he earned a General Educational Diploma (GED).

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provides instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  The instructions show for:

   a.  item 11, enter last unit of assignment and major command; and

   b.  item 20, enter highest grade level completed in years.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he graduated from high school and that he was incarcerated in the Federal Penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, KS.

2.  Records show during the applicant's enlistment processing in September 1972, he indicated that he completed the 11th grade of high school and that he affirmed this information to a vocational counselor in December 1973.

   a.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show that he completed or graduated from high school prior to his discharge.

   b.  The evidence of record shows the applicant's highest level of his civilian education is correctly shown on his DA Form 20 and DD Form 214.

   c.  Thus, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's civilian education in his military records.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was a prisoner at the CHD, USDB, Fort Leavenworth, KS, from 4 December 1973 through 14 February 1974.

   a.  There is no evidence to support the applicant's contention that he was incarcerated at the Federal Penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, KS.

   b.  The evidence of record shows that his DD Form 214 correctly shows his last assignment (i.e., Company B, USA PCF, FGGM, MD).

4.  However, he may use this Record of Proceedings to show he was a prisoner at the USDB, Fort Leavenworth, KS.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006515



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006515



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006545

    Original file (20140006545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. Yes, he went AWOL; however, he was 18 years old when he returned from Vietnam. Notwithstanding his contention that he went AWOL due to mental stress from his service in Vietnam, the evidence of record shows he testified that he went AWOL as a way to escape drugs, did not seek help for his drug problem while on active duty, and continued to use drugs while he was AWOL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015662

    Original file (20090015662.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also stated he was sending a copy of the certificate of completion because the AER for the USACGSOC would not be issued until sometime after the board convenes on 8 September 2008. d. A U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (USACGSC) Diploma that shows the applicant completed the USACGSOC ILE-CC on 18 September 2008. e. Headquarters, USACGSC, Fort Leavenworth, KS, memorandum, undated, subject: ILE-CC Graduation Information Letter, that shows the applicant's AER for completing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004000

    Original file (20090004000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 20 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004000 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * Headquarters (HQ), 1st Infantry Division, Fort Riley, KS Special Orders Number 171, dated 17 July 1965; * HQ, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks (USDB), Fort Leavenworth, KS, Special Orders Number 64, dated 31 March 1967; * HQ, USDB, Fort Leavenworth, KS, Special Orders Number 210, dated 25 October 1967 (continuation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024305

    Original file (20100024305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 May 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024305 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 22 May 1981, the convening authority approved the sentence, ordered the applicant's confinement in the USDB, Fort Leavenworth, KS, and directed the record of trial be forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for review by a Court of Military Review. Thus, the medical records the applicant provided offer no mitigating evidence in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028323

    Original file (20100028323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 1 April 1981 to 3 October 1983 showing he was honorably released from active duty [Item 18 (Remarks) shows the DD Form 214 was administratively issued on 28 May 2003] * a DD Form 214 for the period 28 June 1977 to 2 May 2003 showing he was discharged due to court-martial, other CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081278C070215

    Original file (2002081278C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had completed 3 years, 1 month and 18 days of creditable active military service and he had no recorded lost time. The evidence available indicates that effective 30 April 1982, the applicant's sentence was set aside and the charges were dismissed. The Board believes the applicant's military pay records should be reviewed to determine whether he is due any back pay and allowances as a result of the dismissed charges.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009862C070206

    Original file (20050009862C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a memorandum from the applicant, dated 21 June 2004, subject: Army Grade Determination Board. This document shows, in pertinent part, that the Board reviewed the voluntary retirement submitted by the applicant and the request for a grade determination by USA HRC, Officer Retirements and Separations Section, and the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) (DASA (RB)) directed that the applicant be retired in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011457

    Original file (20110011457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 11, as a result of court-martial with an under other than...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001346

    Original file (0001346.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She has been in confinement over 6 years and the USDB still does not know how to compute her sentence to confinement or her good conduct time. Before she reaches her minimum release date, she will be considered at least 2 more times for clemency and parole. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant disagreed with AFLSA/JAJR’s statement concerning the reason she was denied elevation to trustee status,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085537C070212

    Original file (2003085537C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In October 1989, the United States Army Correctional Activity was redesignated as the United States Army Correctional Brigade (USACB). DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: