Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005755
Original file (20130005755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  12 November 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005755 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his place of entry into active duty as Fresno, California and the location of his advanced individual training (AIT) as Fort Benning, Georgia.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 has Fresno misspelled as Fersno.  It also shows his training in infantry radio maintenance was at Fort Polk, LA.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows in Section IX (Disposition of Inductee by Armed Forces) that the applicant was inducted into the Army in Fresno, CA on 22 October 1964.  He subsequently reported to the United States Army Reception Station at Fort Polk, LA.

3.  On 30 October 1964, the applicant was assigned to Company L, 2nd Training Brigade, Fort Polk, LA, where he commenced and completed basic combat training.

4.  On 8 January 1965, the applicant was enrolled in the Infantry Radio Maintenance Course at the United States Army Infantry School (USAIS), Fort Benning, Georgia.  He completed this AIT on or about 5 April 1965 and was awarded a primary military occupational specialty 311.10, which was subsequently recoded as 31B (Infantry Communications Specialist).

5.  On 21 October 1966, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He had attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4; and had completed 2 years of creditable active duty service.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

	a.  Item 22 (Place of Entry into Current Active Duty Service): Fersno, California; and

	b.  Item 28a (School or Course): USAIS, Fort Polk, LA.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) as in effect at the time, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provided for an entry in Item 22 to show the place of entry into active duty; and in Item 28a to identify a particular school or course of study.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his place of entry into active duty as Fresno, California and the location of his AIT at Fort Benning, Georgia.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was inducted into the Army in Fresno, CA.  However, this city was misspelled on his DD Form 214.  It should be corrected.

3.  The evidence also clearly shows that the applicant attended AIT at Fort Benning, Georgia, and not at Fort Polk, LA as indicated on his DD Form 214.  This error should be corrected.
4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be granted.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing on his DD Form 214:

	a.  in Item 22: Fresno, California; and

	b.  in Item 22a: USAIS, Fort Benning, Georgia




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005755





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005755



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005916

    Original file (20140005916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends the DD Form 214 be amended to delete the entry showing training completed at Fort Polk, and show the following training completed: * Basic Combat Training, US Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Ord,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014205

    Original file (20080014205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show his dates of service in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam. Since there is no provision to show service in Vietnam on the DD Form 214, and there is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to show he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014204

    Original file (20110014204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) * completion of the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course 2. The applicant provides a DD Form 214, DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Diploma for the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course, final transcript for the On Leash Scout Dog...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001633

    Original file (20110001633.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * NAVPERS (Navy Personnel) 1650/65 (Transmittal of and/or Entitlement to Awards) * Diploma of completion of the Infantry NCO Candidate Course * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Special Orders Number 306 (promotion to sergeant) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018043

    Original file (20130018043.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * completion of Airborne School * award of the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) 2. His record does not contain and he does not provide any evidence showing he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award). The regulation states item 13 is self-explanatory and to enter in item 14 in-service training courses by title, number of weeks, and year successfully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004127C070206

    Original file (20050004127C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and his completion of Phases I and II of the Noncommissioned Officer Candidate Course in 1969. The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and three bronze service stars...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084135C070212

    Original file (2003084135C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 July 1971 orders were issued by the 5 th Infantry Division promoting the applicant to pay grade E-4 in MOS 71B20. In February 1972, after receiving excellent conduct and efficiency ratings for his performance of duties as a 71B with the 1 st Infantry Brigade and with the 215 th Combat Support Battalion, the applicant departed Vietnam and was assigned to the United States Army Personnel Center in Oakland, California for separation processing. Although the Board members were not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004425

    Original file (20090004425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 25 (Education and Training Completed) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he completed the Jumpmaster Course. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not show that he met the qualifications of a jumpmaster. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant successfully completed the Jumpmaster Course on 27 June 1970 at the USAIC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005280

    Original file (20110005280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by including an incident report. This incident was not recorded in his service records. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document, along with his application will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003417

    Original file (20130003417.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 June 1967 through 25 January 1969; b. deleting from his DD Form 214 in: * item 23a the entry "052P Radio Operator" * item 25 the...