Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014204
Original file (20110014204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014204 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show:

* the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB)
* that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman)
* completion of the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he served in combat and held MOS 11B in Vietnam but he did not receive his CIB until 1975.  He contends the American Legion helped him get the CIB.  He further states that the Scout Dog Training Course is not listed on his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214, DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Diploma for the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course, final transcript for the On Leash Scout Dog Training Course, and portions of his discharge packet.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 January 1970.  Item 
27 (Military Education) of his DA Form 20 shows he was awarded MOS 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman) upon completion of initial entry training.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 shows he served in Vietnam from 10 April 1971 to 4 February 1972.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to D Troop, 7th Squadron, 17th Cavalry while in Vietnam and his principal duty was "loader, MOS 11H."  The CIB is not included in item  41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20.

4.  His official military personnel file (OMPF) is void of orders or any other document that indicates he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

5.  A final transcript from the U.S. Army Infantry School (USAIS), Fort Benning, GA, indicates he attended the On Leash Scout Dog Handler Course from 
28 September to 18 December 1970.  A USAIS diploma, dated 2 March 1971, confirms he successfully completed the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course.

6.  He was discharged on 28 February 1972.  His discharge orders show his MOS as 11C.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show the CIB.  The Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course is not included in item 25 (Education and Training Completed) of his DD Form 214.  Item 30 (Remarks) shows he was awarded MOS 11C as his primary MOS effective 22 May 1970.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the active Army.  It contains instructions for preparing the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time of his separation provided that in item 25, for enlisted personnel, enter installation training courses (qualification courses), military correspondence courses, and off-duty courses the enlisted person completed during the period covered by the 
DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the CIB, Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course, and that his MOS was 11B has been carefully considered.  

2.  The available evidence shows he completed the On Leash Scout Dog Training Course and the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course during his active duty tenure.  Therefore, these courses should be added to item 25 of his DD Form 214.

3.  The available evidence also shows he was awarded an infantryman MOS of 11C.  However, there is no evidence showing he served in an infantry unit during his tour in Vietnam or that he engaged in active ground combat.  Additionally, his OMPF is void of orders or any other document that indicates he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.  In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for award of the CIB or that he engaged in active ground combat there is an insufficient basis for granting this portion of his request.

4.  His DA Form 20 and DD Form 214 confirm he held MOS 11C throughout his entire period of service.  There is no evidence showing he was ever awarded MOS 11B.  Therefore, this portion of his request should also be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 25 of his DD Form 214 the entries "On Leash Scout Dog Training Course - Fort Benning, Georgia and "Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course - Fort Benning, Georgia."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show the Combat Infantryman Badge and MOS 11B.  




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014204



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014204



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022469

    Original file (20110022469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The certificates and citations provided by the applicant show that his awards were for meritorious service and there is no evidence in his records to show his encounters with the enemy. Although it is likely that he did encounter the enemy given he was a scout dog handler, not every infantryman in Vietnam had encounters with the enemy or were awarded the CIB simply for being an infantryman and being in country.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009362

    Original file (20070009362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with a separation date of 15 July 1969, be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the CIB. The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008093

    Original file (20080008093.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the original consideration of his case, the applicant provided orders that showed he was promoted to Sergeant, E-5, on 15 August 1968 while in the 41st Infantry Platoon (Scout Dog) in MOS 11F4D. Regrettably, without the orders awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal or other corroborating evidence (e.g., an affidavit from the individual who recommended him for the award or from an individual who knew of the circumstances surrounding the recommendation for award and preferably the DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104577C070208

    Original file (2004104577C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that during his RVN tour, the applicant served as an infantryman/dog handler in a qualifying infantry unit and was present with and personally participated with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 15 July 1969 through 7 December 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016884

    Original file (20110016884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal but does not include award of the medals the applicant is requesting. Holding an infantry MOS, being assigned to a qualifying unit, going on patrols, and receiving campaign credit alone are not sufficient to support award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, on 9 December 1970, qualified as an expert with the machinegun, and served in Vietnam during three campaign periods.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003405

    Original file (20130003405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he recently came across several Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decisions in which the Board awarded the CIB to Soldiers who served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist during the Vietnam War * he served in Troop B, 1st Squadron, 9th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), in the Republic of Vietnam, from September 1966 to September 1967 * the CIB was awarded throughout the squadron to Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017316

    Original file (20080017316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant is also entitled to have his records show his awards of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007742

    Original file (20100007742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed infantry training and was awarded MOS 11B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015797

    Original file (20140015797.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service record does not show he was disqualified from receiving the first award of the AGCM for the period 1 July 1969 through 6 May 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 1 July 1969 through 6 May 1971; and c. adding award of the CIB, AGCM (1st Award), Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Valorous Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000721

    Original file (20100000721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military medical records are not available for the Board's review. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. armed services has been wounded, killed, or who has died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Evidence does show...