Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004959
Original file (20130004959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  12 November 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004959 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was placed on the Retired List in pay grade E-7.

2.  The applicant states that although he was unable to locate the actual order promoting him to sergeant first class (SFC)/pay grade E-7 he had submitted documentation with his retirement application showing he held the rank of SFC/E-7.  However, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) placed him on the Retired List in pay grade E-6.  He had requested to be reduced to the rank of staff sergeant/E-6 in order to stay on active flight status for the last years of his service.  He served honorably for 20 years and believes it would be unjust for him to not receive retired pay at the highest grade he successfully held.  	

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored-statement listing the supporting documents he submitted. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served in the Regular Army prior to enlisting in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 3 April 1972.  He served continuously until his transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired).  

2.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 effective 28 December 1979.

3.  On 27 February 1987, the Indiana ARNG issued Orders 40-4, administratively reducing him to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6, effective 27 February 1987 and with a date of rank of 31 March 1975.

4.  His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he was discharged from the ARNG in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 and transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 April 1993.

5.  Orders P09-948225, issued by HRC, dated 24 September 2012, placed him on the Retired List, effective 4 February 2013, in the retired rank of SSG/E-6.

6.  His record is void of orders promoting him to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7.

7.  He provides numerous documents including certificates, Leave and Earnings Statements, an evaluation report, an extension of enlistment, various orders, and other documents listing his rank/grade as SFC/E-7.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 7-14e, provides that concurrent with separation from the ARNG and transfer to the Retired Reserve or placement on the Retired List, Soldiers will be retired at the highest enlisted grade satisfactorily held, provided they were not reduced for misconduct or inefficiency.

9.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held during his or her entire period of service.  If the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade will be the highest grade an enlisted Soldier held while on active duty or in an active Reserve status for at least 185 days or 6 calendar months.  Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory if it is determined that any of the following factors exist:

	a.  revision to a lower grade was expressly for prejudice or cause, due to misconduct, or punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, or court-martial, or

	b.  there is information in the Soldier's service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Though his record is void of orders promoting him to the rank of SFC/E-7, his DA Form 2-1 and numerous other documents including pay documents show he served in the rank of SFC/E-7 for more than 7 years in an active Reserve status.  Evidence supports his contention that he was administratively reduced to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 per his own request.  As such, since he held the pay grade of E-7 in an active Reserve status for at least 185 days or 6 calendar months, he is entitled to placement on the Retired List in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7.  He is also entitled to any back retired pay due him as a result of the above correction.

2.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction of his record as shown below. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders P09-948225, issued by HRC, dated 24 September 2012, to show he was placed on the Retired List in the retired rank and grade of SFC/E7.

2.  The Board further recommends that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service should review the applicant's retired pay account and pay him accordingly based on this correction.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004959



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004959



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011626

    Original file (20130011626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his retirement orders show his grade as SSG/E-6. Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006834

    Original file (20110006834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. By law, a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014344

    Original file (20100014344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the pay grade E-8. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-11c states that the Retired Activities Directorate, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center will screen each retirement applicant's record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001126

    Original file (20130001126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the Armed Forces. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-regular Service) states that a person granted retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013481

    Original file (20100013481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 September 2007, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, published Orders P09-791175 retiring the applicant and placing him on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of SGT/E-5 effective 23 July 2007, the date he turned age 60, in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 12 April 1971 and held that grade until his honorable discharge on 25 March 1974. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026568

    Original file (20100026568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he/his: * LES shows he received casual pay in the amount of $19,488.03 in section 8 (Other Collections) and disability severance pay in section 39 (Remarks) * did receive separation pay, but didn’t receive any disability severance pay * LES is in error * wouldn’t have taken the pay if he thought it would have jeopardized his retirement * commander, executive officer, and separation orders state that he was due separation pay * retired rank should show SFC/E-7 as his highest grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019238

    Original file (20120019238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 June 2012, the Chief, Enlisted Promotions, Promotions Branch, HRC, advised the applicant of the administrative removal of his name from the Fiscal Year 2011 SFC Promotion List due to his declination of promotion in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 4-15a(2)(i). The evidence of record shows he was selected for promotion to SFC with an effective date and date of rank of 1 December 2011 and incurred a two-year service remaining requirement. On 1 May 2012, he declined...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058741C070421

    Original file (2001058741C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military record shows that he was a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Puerto Rico and that he served on active duty in an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) status from 4 August 1981 through 31 March 1999, at which time he was REFRAD for the purpose of retirement. Paragraph 12-3b(1) contains the general provisions of law governing retirement and it states in pertinent part, that ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of their retirement, in a grade lower than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007324

    Original file (20140007324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Orders D-06-036713, dated 4 June 1985 * DD Form 214, ending on 9 February 1983 * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement * Retirement Orders P08-926117, dated 25 August 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, on 16 January 1980, and he held that grade until 9 February 1983 when he was honorably released from active duty and discharged from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005153

    Original file (20140005153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. On 7 February 2000, the TXARNG issued Orders 038-207, discharging him from the ARNG and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 31 December 1999. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders P03-942379, issued by HRC, dated 14 March 2011, to show he was...