Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001126
Original file (20130001126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  8 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001126 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired List in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 instead of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states he joined the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in 1965 and remained until 1974 when he joined the U.S. Navy Reserve (USNR).  While in the USNR he was promoted to pay grade E-7 and received his 20-year letter.  In 1991, he joined the Missouri Air National Guard (MOANG).  He was required to enlist in the MOANG in pay grade E-5.  In 1993, he enlisted in the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) and he was transferred to the Retired Reserve in 1996.  Since he applied for retirement in 2002 he has been paid as an E-5 and not at his highest grade held of E-7.

3.  The applicant provides:

* his Certificate of Permanent Appointment to Chief Aviation Storekeeper (AKC) (pay grade E-7), dated 16 September 1978
* a letter, dated 10 January 1986, from the Commander, Naval Military Personnel Command (now known as Bureau of Naval Personnel (BUPERS))
* two Naval Reserve Earnings Statements for the periods September 1989 and September 1990
* Headquarters, Missouri National Guard Special Order A-43, dated 
30 January 1992
* 
Headquarters, Air Reserve Personnel Center letter, dated 16 July 1993
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 1 March 1996
* Headquarters, Missouri National Guard Orders 033-206, dated 
16 February 1996
* Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement, Application for Retirement Pay, prepared on 13 May 1996
* his Armed Forces of the United States, U.S. Naval Reserve Identification Card, issued on 5 March 1988
* U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (now known as U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)) Orders P09-280613, dated
18 September 2002

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows his date of birth as 15 July 1942.

3.  The applicant previously served in the USAR, USNR, and the MOANG.

4.  He provided his Certificate of Permanent Appointment that shows he was promoted to AKC (pay grade E-7) on 16 September 1978 in the USNR.

5.  He provided a letter from BUPERS, dated 10 January 1986, that identifies him as an AKC and notifies him he had satisfactorily completed the required years of service for retired pay at age 60 (20-year letter).

6.  The two Naval Reserve Statements he provided show he was paid in the grade of E-7 during the periods September 1989 and September 1990.

7.  He provided Headquarters, Missouri National Guard Orders A-43, dated 
30 January 1992, that reduced him without prejudice from master sergeant (E-7) to staff sergeant (E-5) effective 30 December 1991 while assigned to the MOANG.

8.  He was issued a second 20-letter on 16 July 1993 by Headquarters, Air Reserve Personnel Center.

9.  He enlisted in the MOARNG on 24 November 1993 in the grade of E-5.

10.  On 1 March 1996, he was discharged in the grade of SGT/E-5 from the MOARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve.  He completed 30 years,
5 months, and 22 days of total service for pay.

11.  HRC Orders P09-280613, dated 18 September 2002, placed the applicant on the Retired List effective 15 July 2002 with a retired grade of SGT/E-5.

12.  Records show HRC Orders P09-280613 AO1, dated 18 September 2002, amended the applicant's retired grade from SGT/E-5 to SFC/E-7.  The applicant's Soldier Management System (SMS) file further indicates these orders were actually amended in September 2012 but dated on 19 September 2002, the same date as his original orders placing him on the Retired List.

13.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731, states that a person is entitled upon application to retired pay if the person is at least 60 years of age and has performed at least 20 years of qualifying service as computed under section 12732 of this title.

14.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731 provides the legal authority for age and service (non-regular) retirements.  Section 1406 provides the legal authority for establishing the retired pay base for members who first became members before 8 September 1980.  Paragraph (b)(2) contains guidance on non-regular service retirement.  It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the Armed Forces.

15.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-regular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service.  Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory if it is 

determined that any of the following factors exist:  (a) revision to a lower grade was expressly for prejudice or cause, due to misconduct, or punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, or court-martial; or (b) there is information in the Soldier's service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By law, a member granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service.  Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory if it is determined that the revision to a lower grade was due to misconduct or court-martial or if there is information in the member's service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.

2.  In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to AKC (grade E-7) while in the USNR and served in that grade for at least
12 years.  He was reduced to SGT/E-5 without prejudice in the MOANG.  Nothing in his records shows he was reduced for misconduct or any other negative/derogatory reason.

3.  As such, the evidence shows he satisfactorily held the grade of E-7 and he is entitled to correction of his record to show he was placed on the Retired List on 15 July 2002 in the retired grade of SFC (E-7).   He is also entitled to any retired pay due as a result of this correction.

BOARD VOTE:

___X__  ___X_____  __X______  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by

	a.  showing he was timely placed on the Retired List on 15 July 2002 in the retired rank/grade of SFC (E-7) and

	b.  paying him all retired pay due as a result of the above correction.



      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001126



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001126



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019207

    Original file (20120019207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests restoration of his rank/grade to SFC/E-7, the highest rank/grade in which he satisfactorily served in the MOARNG. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 17 April 1973 and served in that rank/pay grade until 4 July 1979. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his retirement orders (Orders P10-928529, dated 19 October 2010) to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014344

    Original file (20100014344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the pay grade E-8. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-11c states that the Retired Activities Directorate, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center will screen each retirement applicant's record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013481

    Original file (20100013481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 September 2007, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, published Orders P09-791175 retiring the applicant and placing him on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of SGT/E-5 effective 23 July 2007, the date he turned age 60, in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 12 April 1971 and held that grade until his honorable discharge on 25 March 1974. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011626

    Original file (20130011626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his retirement orders show his grade as SSG/E-6. Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082406C070215

    Original file (2002082406C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was evidence of manifest error or fraud. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by revoking his discharge of 27 September 1991 from the Reserve of the Army and assigning him to the USAR Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006374

    Original file (20130006374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the orders placing him on the Retired List to show his rank/grade as sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 instead of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 and any due back retired pay in the grade of SFC/E-7. The evidence of record shows the applicant held the rank SFC and voluntarily requested a reduction to SSG. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending Orders Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005153

    Original file (20140005153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. On 7 February 2000, the TXARNG issued Orders 038-207, discharging him from the ARNG and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 31 December 1999. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders P03-942379, issued by HRC, dated 14 March 2011, to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004959

    Original file (20130004959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was placed on the Retired List in pay grade E-7. Though his record is void of orders promoting him to the rank of SFC/E-7, his DA Form 2-1 and numerous other documents including pay documents show he served in the rank of SFC/E-7 for more than 7 years in an active Reserve status. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders P09-948225, issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021964

    Original file (20100021964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired in the highest rank/grade he held, which was sergeant (SGT)/E-5. Item 26 (Military Service) of a DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment –Armed Forces of the United States) lists his pay grade, service and component, date of entry, and date of his discharge as: * E-3 – U.S. Army – 17 April 1969 – 3 November 1970 * E-3 – USAR – 4 November 1970 – 22 June 1973 * E-4 – Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) – 23 June 1973 – 14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082908C070215

    Original file (2002082908C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application to the Army Grade Determination Board (AGRDB) requesting advancement on the Retired list to the pay grade of E-7. This law authorizes Reserve enlisted members of the Army to be placed on the Retired List in the highest enlisted grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily. The laws and regulations in effect at that time provided for his placement on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his REFRAD, and for his...