Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007324
Original file (20140007324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  25 November 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140007324 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List on his 60th birthday in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 vice staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 with back retired pay.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he served in the Kansas Army National Guard (KSARNG) and entered active duty on 28 July 1981.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 9 February 1983, shows his rank/grade as SFC/E-7, effective 16 January 1980. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Orders D-06-036713, dated 4 June 1985
* DD Form 214, ending on 9 February 1983
* ARNG Retirement Points History Statement
* Retirement Orders P08-926117, dated 25 August 2010

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was born in September 1950.

3.  He enlisted in the KSARNG on 7 June 1972.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 15 September 1972 and completed training for military occupational specialty (MOS) 71H (Personnel Specialist).  He was honorably released from ADT on 12 January 1973. 

4.  He served in a variety of positions and/or units within the ARNG, mainly with the 891st Engineer Battalion.  He was advanced to SSG/E-6 on 10 June 1977.

5.  On 16 January 1980, the KSARNG published Orders 1-5 promoting him to platoon sergeant/E-7 and awarding him primary MOS 12B4O (Combat Engineer), secondary MOS 75Z4O (Personnel Senior Sergeant), and the additional MOS 71D4O (Legal Specialist).

6.  On 21 July 1981, he executed a 3-year extension in the ARNG while holding the rank/grade of SFC/E-7.

7.  He entered active duty on 28 July 1981 and he was honorably released from active duty on 9 February 1983.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service listed his rank/grade as SFC/E-7 with an effective date of 16 January 1980. 

8.  He was honorably discharged from the ARNG on 9 February 1983 and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for this period of service listed his rank/grade as SFC/E-7 with an effective date of 16 January 1980.

9.  On 4 June 1985, the USAR Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO published Orders 0-06-036713 honorably discharging him from the USAR effective 6 June 1985.  The orders listed his rank/grade as SFC/E-7. 

10.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) listed the rank of SFC as the highest rank he held. 

11.  After a break in service, he enlisted in the KSARNG in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 21 September 1987.  He was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 19 September 1988.  He also executed two 6-year extensions on 5 August 1990 and on 3 July 1996.

12.  On 7 October 1996, the KSARNG issued him a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). 

13.  He was honorably discharged from the ARNG and he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 20 September 2002.  His discharge orders and resultant NGB Form 22 listed his rank as SSG.

14.  On 4 January 2009, as he approached age 60, he submitted a DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits).  He indicated the highest military grade he held was E-7.

15.  On 25 August 2010, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, published Orders P08-926117 placing him on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 6 September 2010. 

16.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7B (Military Pay Policy and Procedures-Retired Pay), chapter 1 (Initial Entitlements- Retirements), section 0105 (Rank and Pay Grade), paragraph 010501A (General Determinations) states that unless entitled to a higher grade under some other provision of law, those Regular and Reserve members who retire other than for disability, will retire in the Regular or Reserve grade they hold on the date of retirement.  Paragraph 10503 (Satisfactory Service) provides that the determination as to what constitutes satisfactory service for the purpose of retirement in the highest grade is within the discretionary power of the Secretary of the Military Department concerned.

17.  Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service.  Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory if it is determined that any of the following factors exist: (a) revision to a lower grade was expressly for prejudice or cause, due to misconduct, or punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, or court-martial; or (b) there is information in the Soldier's service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By law and regulation, a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service.  Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory if it is determined that the revision to a lower grade was due to misconduct or court-martial or if there is information in the Soldier's service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.

2.  In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, on 16 January 1980, and he held that grade until 
9 February 1983 when he was honorably released from active duty and discharged from the ARNG. 

3.  After a period in the Individual Ready Reserve, he again enlisted in the KSARNG in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 on 21 September 1987.  He was promoted to SSG/E-6 and he was ultimately transferred to the Retired Reserve on 20 September 2002 in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6.

4.  Nothing in his records shows he was reduced from the rank of SFC/E-7 for misconduct or any other negative/derogatory reason.  Therefore, he should be entitled to correction of his records to show he retired in the rank/grade of SFC/ E-7 on his 60th birthday and restoration of all retired pay as a result of this correction.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* amending Orders P08-926117 issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, on 25 August 2010, to show he was retired in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, effective 6 September 2010

* auditing his pay records and paying him all retired pay due as a result of this correction



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007324



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007324



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016267

    Original file (20110016267.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In arriving at the highest grade satisfactorily held, if the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade will be that which an enlisted Soldier held while on active duty or in an active Reserve status for at least 185 days or 6 calendar months. The evidence of record shows the KSARNG issued orders promoting the applicant to SFC/E-7 on 4 June 1998. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard and the Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025041

    Original file (20100025041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he is entitled to retired pay at the highest grade he held. Orders P08-486895, issued by the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command on 18 August 2004, placed him on the Retired List effective 29 September 2004 and confirmed he was authorized retired pay under Title 10, United States Code, Section 12731. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006834

    Original file (20110006834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. By law, a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015712

    Original file (20080015712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an unsigned copy of a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 34-1 (Application for AGR Position) that shows he provided information for use in determining his eligibility for this vacancy announcement. However, there is no evidence that the applicant was higher on the promotion list than the Soldier who was selected for the position. Furthermore, at the time of the position vacancy announcement, the applicant had completed over 22 years of creditable active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026331

    Original file (20100026331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was placed on the Retired List in pay grade E-8. An ARNG Retirement Points History Statement, prepared on 17 August 2007, shows his highest grade held as E-8. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 7-14e, provides that concurrent with separation from the ARNG and transfer to the Retired Reserve or placement on the Retired List, Soldiers will be retired at the highest enlisted grade satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000177

    Original file (20140000177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * AF Form 224 (Recommendation and Authorization for Promotion of Airman as a Reserve of the Air Force) * Letter of acceptance into the 774th Transportation Company * NGB Form 23B (ARNG Retirement Points History Statement) * Retirement orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 25 July 2014, HRC published Orders C11-298824A01 amending his retirement orders to show he was placed on the Retired List in his retired grade of MSG/E-8 effective his 60th birthday. The NGB Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022239

    Original file (20110022239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank/pay grade of major (MAJ)/O-4, the highest grade he satisfactorily held. It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004845

    Original file (20110004845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * Public Law 230, Title 10, and Section 3964 entitle him to promotion to SFC * The "P" shown in item 13 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Date Awarded) of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) indicates he was promotable 3. In his self-authored statement the applicant contends he should be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade held satisfactorily while on active duty, under the provisions of Title...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004089

    Original file (20140004089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he held the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 when he was discharged from active duty * he enlisted in the Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) approximately 2 years later in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 because there were no E-7 positions available * he was promoted to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 in the MSARNG * he was always told he would retire in the highest rank successfully held * he retired on 24 December 2013 and his retirement orders show his rank/grade as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057694C070420

    Original file (2001057694C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Department of the Army (DA) Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) confirms, in block 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7 on 21 February 1975, which is the highest rank he held while on active duty. On 24 August 2001, the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) denied the applicant’s request to be advanced to the rank and pay grade of MSG/E-8 on the Retired List. The evidence of record confirms that the...