Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016683
Original file (20130016683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  11 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016683 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). 

2.  The applicant states that in December/January 2011 he out-processed at Fort Drum, NY prior to medical retirement.  He becomes very distressed when he is in public due to his medical conditions.  During his SBP briefing he began to have a panic attack and wanted to leave.  He explained that he was not interested in the SBP.  His wife agreed to sign away her right to the benefit because they did not want the SBP.  The employee conducting the SBP brief continued to repeatedly pressure him even though he stated he did not want to participate in the SBP three times.  He felt like he would not be able to leave until he signed the contract.  He signed the contract just to get out of the room because he felt like he was about to die.  He feels he was pressured and coerced into signing the SBP contract and now wants to cancel his SBP because he and his wife are on a fixed income and cannot afford the expense.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* SBP Premium Bill, dated April 2013
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 30 August 2013
* Notarized letter for the applicant’s spouse, dated 30 August 2013


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 3 January 2008, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and held military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

2.  His record does not contain Medical Evaluation Board (MEB)/Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings or a DD Form 2656.  However, an e-mail from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, dated 19 May 2014, confirms the applicant elected spouse only SBP coverage on his DD Form 2656.

3.  Orders Number 018-1000, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Drum, NY, dated 18 January 2011, released him from his assignment because of a physical disability and directed that he be retired in the rank/grade of private/  E-1 with a 100 percent (%) disability rating.  He was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), effective 27 January 2011.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired by reason of a temporary disability on 26 January 2011.

5.  He provided an SBP premium bill, dated April 2013, which shows he had accumulated SBP premiums in the amount of $1,557.12 as of April 2013.

6.  He provided a notarized DD Form 2656, dated 30 August 2013.  This form shows he elected not to participate in the SBP.  He and his spouse signed the document on 29 August 2013 and the notary official signed and notarized it on
30 August 2013.

7.  His spouse signed a notarized statement, dated 30 August 2013, wherein she waived her rights to the SBP annuity and indicated she agreed with the applicant’s decision not to participate in the SBP.  She also stated her husband told the SBP counselor they did not want to participate in the SBP numerous times.  However, he was repeatedly pressured and his request to decline SBP coverage was ignored.  He began having a panic attack and eventually signed the SBP contract as a result of the pressure the SBP counselor was applying.

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  The election must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to spouse coverage, if applicable.

9.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant initially elected spouse only SBP coverage, was retired on 26 January 2011, and was placed on the TDRL on 
27 January 2011.  

2.  By law and regulation, married Soldiers who retire from the Army must take action to decline SBP.  Here, it appears the applicant began having a panic attack due to his medical condition and felt pressured to agree to participate in the SBP.  

3.  However, his application to the ABCMR clearly indicates that he is electing not to participate in the SBP.  His spouse submitted a notarized statement agreeing with the applicant's election.

4.  Therefore, in the interest of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he elected not to participate in the SBP.  The applicant's spouse's vested interest in the SBP election has been satisfied through the submission of the notarized statement.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  showing the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 electing not to participate in the SBP and that his spouse concurred with his decision, with any 

required notarizations, and that the form was accepted by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service prior to his 26 January 2011 retirement date; and

	b.  as a result of this correction, reimbursing him any premiums already paid.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016683



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016683



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018041

    Original file (20080018041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ABCMR analyst of record telephonically contacted the DFAS Retired Pay Office on 23 January 2009, which confirmed that the DD Form 2656, dated 10 July 2008 was not authenticated by the spouse on or after the date the applicant made his election. In a notarized statement, dated 27 January 2009, the applicant's spouse indicated that she had previously agreed with her husband's decision to not participate in the SBP and that she previously signed the one form provided by the Fort Drum, NY,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016301

    Original file (20100016301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that he be reimbursed for any and all deductions from his retirement pay. His spouse provided a notarized statement, dated 19 May 2010, which is accepted as sufficient evidence to support her concurrence with his decision to cancel enrollment in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012530

    Original file (20110012530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * SBP Spouse Election Concurrence Statement * Retiree Account Statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 9 March 2011 (effective 1 April 2011), shows an SBP deduction for spouse coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003410

    Original file (20130003410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The available evidence shows that, approximately 4 months after the effective date of his placement on the TDRL, the applicant attempted to elect not to participate in the SBP. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he made a timely election not to participate in the SBP prior to his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011948

    Original file (20120011948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for terminating enrollment in the SBP in this case. However, he is not precluded from exercising his option to disenroll from the SBP with his wife's notarized concurrence during the 1-year period following the second anniversary of receipt of his retired pay without repayment of premiums.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016266

    Original file (20110016266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An SBP election must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or the SBP will, by law, default to automatic SBP spouse coverage (if married). However, the evidence also shows that both the applicant and her spouse signed a subsequent form declining coverage prior to the effective date of her retirement and the form was duly notarized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing her duly-notarized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019360

    Original file (20120019360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she completed and signed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 19 August 2011, electing not to participate in the SBP. The evidence shows that at the time the applicant submitted her DD Form 2656 she elected not to participate in the SBP; however, her spouse did not sign the form concurring with her election until after she had retired. Therefore, since she has failed to show that she was misinformed of her options under the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003093

    Original file (20150003093.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An email from DFAS confirmed the following: * the applicant's account currently shows she declined SBP coverage effective 6 March 2015; no premiums are being deducted at this time * at her retirement, the applicant's account listed no beneficiary * when she reported her marriage, 1 month (and only 1 month) of SBP premiums was deducted * SBP coverage stopped in March 2015 based upon the receipt of further documentation clarifying the applicant had declined coverage * there is no indication in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004393

    Original file (20110004393.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 10 September 2010, and a notarized Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement, dated 15 February 2011. In the notification he was advised that Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of this letter, a qualified Reserve Component (RC) member who is married will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under option C for spouse and child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004758

    Original file (20110004758.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * His and his spouse's DD Forms 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * His April 2011 and his spouse's March 2011 RAS * Wife's notarized statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of the DD Form 2656 instructs the applicant that "SBP spouse concurrence is required when a member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage. However, by law, his spouse was required...