Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022660
Original file (20120022660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022660 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate or Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was retired by reason of physical disability in the rank/pay grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states he had a grade determination at his last duty station which indicated he was to be retired at the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 since that was the last rank/grade he held the longest.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* Orders 100-0002
* Physical Disability Information Report

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having previous active service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 18 October 2007.

3.  Evidence in the applicant's record shows he received an Article 15 while in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 on 17 December 2008, and an Article 15 while in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 on 5 February 2009 which apparently reduced him to private (PVT)/E-1.

4.  On 10 March 2009, while in the rank of PVT/E-1, an informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened in Washington, D.C., and found his medical condition of post-traumatic stress disorder prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and specialty and determined that he was physically unfit.  He was rated under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities and granted a 50% disability rating.  The PEB recommended that the applicant be separated with entitlement to severance pay if otherwise qualified.  He concurred with the PEB's finding and recommendation and waived his right to a formal hearing.

5.  On 31 March 2009, the Army Grade Determination Review Board    thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s records and determined that the highest grade in which the applicant satisfactorily served for the purpose of computation of disability separation pay is the rank/grade of SPC/E-4.

6.  The applicant provides and his record contains Orders 100-0002, issued by Installation Management Command - Europe, dated 10 April 2009, releasing him from assignment and duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permit his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).  His effective date of retirement is noted as 2 July 2009, with placement on the retirement list on 3 July 2009, in the retired rank and grade of SPC/E-4. 

7.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) "PV1"
* item 4b (Pay Grade) "E01"
* item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) "2009  02  05"

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation states that the Soldier's active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation would be entered in item 4a and item 4b of the DD Form 214.  Additionally, this regulation stipulates an additional DD Form 214 will not be issued upon release from the TDRL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicable regulation states that a Soldier's active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation would be entered in item 4a and item 4b of the DD Form 214.  Evidence shows the applicant was reduced to the rank/grade of PVT/E-1 on 5 February 2009 and the information is correctly annotated on his DD Form 214.  

2.  The applicant is further advised that his retirement orders correctly reflect his retirement rank/grade and are the source document for his retired pay.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022660



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022660



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002194

    Original file (20110002194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was retired as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. Her DD Form 214 currently shows she was retired due to temporary disability in the rank/pay grade of SPC/E-4 with an effective date of promotion of 22 October 2003. In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her DD Form 214 to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with an effective date and date of rank of 10 November 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013698

    Original file (20130013698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) – "SPC" and "E4" * item 23 (Type of Separation) – other than retirement 2. Paragraph 2 of these orders show he was released from assignment and duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002798

    Original file (20080002798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002798 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division and Fort Riley Orders 228-0002, dated 16 August 2007, show the applicant was placed on the retired list on 1 September 2007. Land Component, Joint Headquarters Kansas Orders 311-728, dated 7 November 2007, show that the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SGT/E-5 effective 30 August 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017814

    Original file (20080017814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was promoted to SPC; however, a correction to his DD Form 214 (DD Form 215) was never issued to reflect this promotion. No DD Form 215 was available in the applicant’s personnel record. The evidence of record confirms the FSM was promoted to SPC/E-4 on 1 December 1996, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, as evidenced by the DA Form 4187, dated 7 November 1996, USASTP Memorandum, dated 10 June 1997, and orders contained in the FSM record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023964

    Original file (20110023964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) pocket guide * extract of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) * Headquarters, 3rd Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007644

    Original file (20090007644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records available to the Board indicate the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 16 April 2003. On 25 April 2008 Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Orders 116-0909 were issued at Fort Gordon, Georgia, retiring the applicant from active duty by reason of physical disability with a retirement date of 30 May 2008 and placement on the TDRL effective 31 May 2008 in the grade of SPC [specialist]. On 30 May 2008 the applicant was retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005005

    Original file (20120005005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant retired on 27 January 2005. As such, his DD Form 214 correctly listed his rank/grade of SSG/E-6 and his retirement orders correctly retired him in the higher grade.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008727

    Original file (20130008727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The applicant provides: * DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement) * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * a memorandum, subject: Grade Determination Request (applicant's name), dated 5 November 2012 * 2 pages of a Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, as of 5 October 2012 * DD Form 214WS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016653

    Original file (20120016653.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He was removed from the TDRL and elected to enlist in the Regular Army within 90 days of his removal * He completed a USAREC Form 1035 (Request to Change Enlistment Option) wherein he elected to enlist on 17 April 2009 * Due to confusion with the TDRL to active duty process, he was pending reclassification into military occupational specialty (MOS) 89D (Explosive Ordnance Disposal Specialist) * By regulation, a former TDRL PFC would be promoted like they would have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013248

    Original file (20130013248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 November 2011, after a thorough review of the applicant's personnel records, PEB Proceedings, and all applicable documentation, the AGDRB determined the applicant had accepted an Article 15 on 5 January 2011 while in the grade of E-4 and a subsequent Article 15 on 10 March 2011. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's...