Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008727
Original file (20130008727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	    16 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008727 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). 

2.  The applicant states he was on the recommended list for promotion to SGT prior to his separation.  Therefore, he should have been placed on the TDRL in the rank of SGT in accordance with Army regulation.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement)
* Enlisted Record Brief (ERB)
* a memorandum, subject:  Grade Determination Request (applicant's name), dated 5 November 2012
* 2 pages of a Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, as of 5 October 2012
* DD Form 214WS (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty - Worksheet)
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Orders 050-0017, issued by Headquarters, Third Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, dated 19 February 2013


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 21 May 2007.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 92W (Water Treatment Specialist).  On 26 June 2009, he reenlisted in the RA for a period of 5 years in the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3.

2.  The applicant's record shows he served in Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) from 8 December 2008 to 26 November 2009.

3.  His record contains a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 15 October 2010, that shows while in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4, he achieved the course standards at the Petroleum Supply Specialist Course at Fort Lee, VA.

4.  The applicant provides and his record contains Orders 050-0017, dated
19 February 2013, that show he was to be released from assignment because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted him to be placed on the TDRL effective 27 March 2013 in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.

5.  His record also contains:

	a.  Orders 085-0012, issued by Headquarters, Third Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, dated 26 March 2013, that revoked Orders 050-0017, dated
19 February 2013.

	b.  Orders 094-0006, issued by the same headquarters, dated 4 April 2013, that show he was to be released from assignment because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted him to be placed on the TDRL effective 27 June 2013 in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3.

	c.  DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data) completed by the applicant on
16 April 2013 that shows his rank as PFC.

   d.  SGLV 8286 (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate) completed by the applicant on 16 April 2013.  This document also shows his rank as PFC.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows he was retired on 27 June 2013 in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or 


Separation), paragraph 4, by reason of temporary physical disability.  He completed 6 years, 1 month, and 7 days of creditable active service.  His DD Form 214 further shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) "PFC"
* item 4b (Pay Grade) "E03"
* item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) "2013  01  17"

7.  The applicant provides:

	a.  A copy of a Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, dated 5 October 2012, that shows his rank as SPC in the primary zone for promotion consideration to SGT.

	b.  A memorandum from the U.S. Army Medical Department Activity, Fort Stewart, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Liaison Officer to the President of the PEB, dated 5 November 2012, that shows the applicant requested a grade determination.

	c.  An ERB, dated 18 January 2013, that shows he was promotable to the rank of SGT effective July 2011.

	d.  DD Form 214WS that indicates he was to be retired and placed on the TDRL on 27 March 2013 in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.

8.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirmed the applicant’s pay grade as follows:

* E-4 from 1 September 2009 through 16 January 2013
* E-3 from 17 January 2013 through 27 June 2013

9.  DFAS further confirmed the applicant was retired on 27 June 2013 by reason of temporary disability in the grade of E-3.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions) prescribes policies and procedures governing the promotion and reduction of Army enlisted personnel. 
Paragraph 1-20 (Promotion of Soldiers Pending Referral to an MOS Medical Retention Board, Medical Evaluation Board, or PEB) provides that per the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the retired list.


11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation states that the Soldier's active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation would be entered in item 4a and item 4b of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 prior to placement on the TDRL has been carefully examined; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's request.

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 1-20, provides that per the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  Although the applicant provides evidence that shows he was in the primary zone for promotion consideration to SGT presumably as late as January 2013, there is ample evidence to show the applicant's rank as PFC with a date of rank of
17 January 2013 prior to his retirement date.

3.  Furthermore, the supporting regulation states that a Soldier's active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation would be entered in item 4a and item 4b of the DD Form 214.  Based on the entry in item 12h of his DD Form 214, the evidence appears to indicate the applicant may have been reduced to PFC/E-3 on 17 January 2013.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008727



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008727



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017814

    Original file (20080017814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was promoted to SPC; however, a correction to his DD Form 214 (DD Form 215) was never issued to reflect this promotion. No DD Form 215 was available in the applicant’s personnel record. The evidence of record confirms the FSM was promoted to SPC/E-4 on 1 December 1996, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, as evidenced by the DA Form 4187, dated 7 November 1996, USASTP Memorandum, dated 10 June 1997, and orders contained in the FSM record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008377

    Original file (20140008377.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the rating period 1 August 2011 through 31 July 2012 * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 13 February 2013 * Certificate for award of the Army Commendation Medal, dated 19 February 2013 * Orders Number 335-0313, dated 30 November 2012 * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence to show the applicant was recommended for the E-6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008478

    Original file (20120008478.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Medical Command (MEDCOM) Test Form 1381 (Theater Medical Registry Record), dated 15 November 2005 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) from SPC Jxxxx A. Hxxxxxxx, dated 17 June 2008 * DD Form 2796, dated 10 December 2005 * DD Form 214 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period of service ending on 6 September 2008 * Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002194

    Original file (20110002194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was retired as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. Her DD Form 214 currently shows she was retired due to temporary disability in the rank/pay grade of SPC/E-4 with an effective date of promotion of 22 October 2003. In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her DD Form 214 to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with an effective date and date of rank of 10 November 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009402

    Original file (20120009402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders Number 059-0008, issued by Headquarters, 3rd Infantry Division and Fort Stewart, Fort Stewart, GA, on 28 February 2012, showed his rank/grade as SGT/E-5 and directed: * he be released from assignment and active duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay under conditions that permitted his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) * his effective date of retirement was listed as 24 April 2012 * he was to be placed on the retired list on 25...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016248

    Original file (20100016248.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100016248 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 by official orders on 1 February 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Orders 040-0043, issued by Headquarters, Fort Stewart, GA, on 9 February 2010, to show his current and retired rank as SGT, pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013028

    Original file (20130013028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 18 March 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130013028 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states his DD Form 214 lists his last rank as E4; however, he was retired in the rank of E5. Therefore, items 4a, 4b, and 12h of his 2005 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank and grade as SGT/E5 and effective date of 27 May 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003316

    Original file (20130003316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Military Personnel Message Number 05-084, dated 4 April 2005, subject: Enlisted Eligibility Regarding Enlisted Soldiers Undergoing Evaluation by the MOS/Medical Retention Board (MMRB), Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or PEB, references Army Regulation 600-8-19 and Headquarters, Department of the Army, memorandum, dated 28 March 2005, and states Soldiers who are on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade. He was a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023964

    Original file (20110023964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) pocket guide * extract of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) * Headquarters, 3rd Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020325

    Original file (20110020325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 17 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020325 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Orders Number 201-0028, Headquarters, National Training Center and Fort Irwin, Fort Irwin, CA, dated 20 July 2011, show the applicant was released from duty because of a physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 70 percent rating, under Title 10, United States Code...