Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013698
Original file (20130013698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    1 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013698 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) – "SPC" and "E4"
* item 23 (Type of Separation) – other than retirement

2.  The applicant states he was promoted to specialist (SPC) effective 1 November 2003.  He also states he was placed on temporary retirement, not permanently retired. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* City of Leominster Department of Veterans' Services letter
* DD Form 214
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record)
* Enlisted Record Brief (ERB)   

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 16 October 2002, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.

3.  His DA Form 2-1 shows he was advanced to the rank of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 effective 1 June 2003 and to the rank of SPC effective 1 November 2003.

4.  His record in the Integrated Web Services database and his ERB show his rank as PFC with a date of rank of 1 June 2003.  His ERB does not show that he ever held the rank of SPC.

5.  Department of the Army, Headquarters, Fort McPherson Orders 308-0002, dated 3 November 2004, assigning him to the U.S. Army Transition Center for separation processing show his rank in the standard name line as "PFC."  Paragraph 2 of these orders show he was released from assignment and duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions that permitted his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).  These orders show the effective date of his retirement as 17 December 2004 with placement on the retired list effective 18 December 2004.  It further shows his retired grade of rank as "PFC."  It also shows a percentage of disability of "30."

6.  His disability separation packet is not available for review.

7.  His DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist), dated 25 August 2004, shows his grade as "E3." 

8.  His DD Form 214 shows that on 17 December 2004 he was retired from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(2).  It shows he completed 2 years, 2 months, and 2 days of creditable active service.  This form further shows in:

* item 4a and item 4b – "PFC" and "E3"
* item 18 (Remarks) – "RETIRED LIST GRADE PFC"
* item 23 (Type of Separation) – "RETIREMENT"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – "DISABILITY, TEMPORARY"

9.  During the processing of this case, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) indicated that the Soldier's Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) shows his pay grade was E-3 effective 1 June 2003 through his separation date of 17 December 2004.

10.  U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Orders D075-03, dated 15 March 2006, removed him from the TDRL and discharged him from the service effective 15 March 2006 with a 10 percent disability rating.

11.  Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.  Paragraph 3-9 states that requirements for placement on the TDRL are the same as for permanent retirement.

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations – Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 was a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It stated for:

* items 4a and 4b - enter active duty rank and pay grade at time of separation from ERB
* item 23 - enter the appropriate term listed below:

* Release from active duty
* Discharge
* Retirement
* Release from active duty and order to active duty in another status
* Release from ADT
* Release from custody and control of the Army
* Release from ADT and discharge from the Reserve of the Army and return to the ARNG

13.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request.

2.  Department of the Army, Headquarters, Fort McPherson Orders 308-0002 retired the applicant due to disability effective 17 December 2004.  He was placed on the TDRL the following day.  Item 23 of his DD Form 214 shows "RETIREMENT" and item 28 shows "DISABILITY, TEMPORARY."

3.  Regulatory policy states that requirements for placement on the TDRL are the same as for permanent retirement.  As such, notwithstanding the fact that he was later removed from the TDRL and discharged effective 15 March 2006, there is no evidence of an error in the entry in item 23 of his DD Form 214 and no basis for changing the entry. 

4.  His DA Form 2-1 contains an entry showing he held the rank of SPC effective 1 November 2003.  However, all other available evidence in his records to include his MMPA show his rank as PFC/E-3, effective 1 June 2003, as it is reflected on his DD Form 214.

5.  The Board starts its consideration with a presumption of regularity, that what the Army did was correct.  The burden of proving otherwise is the responsibility of the applicant.  Therefore, absent more compelling evidence to overcome the preponderance of the evidence showing his rank as PFC, it is presumed that the applicant's rank at the time of separation was, in fact, PFC.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013698



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013698



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008727

    Original file (20130008727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The applicant provides: * DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement) * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * a memorandum, subject: Grade Determination Request (applicant's name), dated 5 November 2012 * 2 pages of a Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, as of 5 October 2012 * DD Form 214WS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017814

    Original file (20080017814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was promoted to SPC; however, a correction to his DD Form 214 (DD Form 215) was never issued to reflect this promotion. No DD Form 215 was available in the applicant’s personnel record. The evidence of record confirms the FSM was promoted to SPC/E-4 on 1 December 1996, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, as evidenced by the DA Form 4187, dated 7 November 1996, USASTP Memorandum, dated 10 June 1997, and orders contained in the FSM record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023964

    Original file (20110023964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) pocket guide * extract of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) * Headquarters, 3rd Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002194

    Original file (20110002194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was retired as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. Her DD Form 214 currently shows she was retired due to temporary disability in the rank/pay grade of SPC/E-4 with an effective date of promotion of 22 October 2003. In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her DD Form 214 to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with an effective date and date of rank of 10 November 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007368

    Original file (20090007368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His records show he was advanced to pay PFC, pay grade E-3, on 1 April 2005. The evidence shows he was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade of PFC, E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016653

    Original file (20120016653.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He was removed from the TDRL and elected to enlist in the Regular Army within 90 days of his removal * He completed a USAREC Form 1035 (Request to Change Enlistment Option) wherein he elected to enlist on 17 April 2009 * Due to confusion with the TDRL to active duty process, he was pending reclassification into military occupational specialty (MOS) 89D (Explosive Ordnance Disposal Specialist) * By regulation, a former TDRL PFC would be promoted like they would have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018710

    Original file (20110018710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his grade and pay grade on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 26 April 2004 be corrected to show specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. There are no DA Forms 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) in his official military personnel file (OMPF). The Total Army Personnel Data Base (TAPDB) shows his grade as PFC with a date of rank of 6 February 2004.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013028

    Original file (20130013028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 18 March 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130013028 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states his DD Form 214 lists his last rank as E4; however, he was retired in the rank of E5. Therefore, items 4a, 4b, and 12h of his 2005 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank and grade as SGT/E5 and effective date of 27 May 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010568

    Original file (20090010568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 4a on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "SGT" [sergeant]. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 4a and 4b on his DD Form 214 to show staff sergeant/E-6. The entry in Section I on the applicant's ERB which shows he served in Kuwait from 29 October 1990 to 15 April 1991 is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend item 18 on his DD Form 214 to show this deployment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028858

    Original file (20100028858.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. He also provides: * a Certificate of Retirement showing his rank as SPC * a memorandum, dated 2 September 2009, and Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2009, from DFAS showing his rank as SGT * a Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 17 June 2010, showing his DOB as 8 March 1984 and his rank as SGT 13. He states his DOB is 8 March 1984; however, his record shows...