Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019482
Original file (20120019482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019482 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the:

* Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 
* two awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM)

2.  He states he is missing the ARCOM and two AAMs that he received from the 
1st Battalion, 9th Field Artillery Battalion, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, GA.

3.  He provides copies of his DD Form 214; medical documents, dated in 2012; and a supporting statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 19 September 2002 to
17 February 2005.  He completed 2 years, 3 months, and 15 days of active service and he had approximately 43 days of lost time.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows his last duty assignment as 1st Battalion, 9th Field Artillery Battalion, Fort Stewart, GA.  Item 13 of this form does not show award of the ARCOM or the AAM.

4.  There are no recommendations, certificates, or orders in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (previously known as the Official Military Personnel File) that show he was awarded the ARCOM or AAM.  Additionally, these awards are not listed on his Enlisted Record Brief.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the AAM is awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished himself or herself by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contention that he was awarded the ARCOM and two awards of the AAM is acknowledged; however, there is no official documentation showing he received these awards.  In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019482



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019482



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013170

    Original file (20110013170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army regulations require orders for the issuance of awards and decorations. Without orders, the ARCOM Certificate provided by the applicant is insufficient evidence to add the award to his DD Form 214. Army regulations prohibit the listing of certificates of achievement, letters of appreciation, and similar documents on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005911

    Original file (20140005911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001745

    Original file (20140001745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. he completed Airborne training; b. he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Combat Patch for service during mission Urgent Fury in Grenada, six awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and awards of the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM) for service in Grenada in 1983 and for security operations in Fort Indiantown Gap, PA during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012874

    Original file (20110012874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or any other evidence in his OMPF, such as DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award), showing he was awarded two awards of the ARCOM or three awards of the AAM. Although the applicant provided an address in Port Lavaca, TX for item 19a of his DD Form 214, it does not change the HOR at the time of entry into military service. Based on the above and the fact that there is no evidence in his OMPF or iPERMS record that shows he was awarded any additional awards of the ARCOM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054167C070420

    Original file (2001054167C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests in effect, that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty DD Form 214, be corrected to show the awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM). There are no orders in the applicant’s record, which shows that he was awarded the AAM. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service record, which shows that he was awarded the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025224

    Original file (20110025224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His official military personnel file (OMPF) is void of any orders or other documents that show he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM with "V" device during his active duty service. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device. There is no available evidence to show he was recommended for or awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022941

    Original file (20100022941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 November 1943. The FSM's separation documents do not show award of the ARCOM or the AAM and there are no orders in his available records that show he was awarded these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 26 of his 31 August 1965 DD Form 214 the following: * Navy Unit Commendation * Army of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005378

    Original file (20090005378.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 12f of the applicant's DD Form 214 contains the entry "0000 00 00" which indicates he completed no overseas service during the period covered by the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. However, his records are void of any orders or other documents showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the ARCOM by proper authority while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001184

    Original file (20120001184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and Army Achievement Medal (AAM) * he served with the 82d Airborne Division 2. The evidence of record is void of orders showing the applicant was awarded the ARCOM or AAM. However, the evidence clearly shows his last duty assignment was with Company A, 2d Battalion, 87th Infantry Regiment, 8th Infantry Division and the...