Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013170
Original file (20110013170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  18 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013170 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and a Commanding General's (CG) Letter of Commendation be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states he was not aware he could request a change to his
DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* ARCOM Certificate
* CG Letter of Commendation with 1st and 2nd Endorsements

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program (DEP) for 6 years on 24 September 1982.  On 27 December 1982, he was discharged from the DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army for 2 years on 28 December 1982.

3.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains:

* Permanent Orders 211-4, Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division and Fort Stewart, GA, dated 13 November 1984, awarding the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM)
* Permanent Orders 74-1, Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division and Fort Stewart, GA, dated 20 April 1984, awarding the Army Achievement Medal (AAM)
* a copy of the CG Letter of Commendation with Endorsements

4.  There are no orders awarding the ARCOM in the applicant's OMPF.  A review of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) does not show the ARCOM as an authorized award in Block 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns).

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the policies and procedures for the preparation and issuance of separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It states to list awards and decorations for all periods of service in the priority sequence specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 gives the order of precedence for awards and decorations.  Only decorations, medals, and ribbons are listed.  Certificates of achievement, letters of appreciation, and similar documents are not listed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests the ARCOM and a CG Letter of Commendation be added to his DD Form 214.


2.  Army regulations require orders for the issuance of awards and decorations.  Without orders, the ARCOM Certificate provided by the applicant is insufficient evidence to add the award to his DD Form 214.

3.  Army regulations prohibit the listing of certificates of achievement, letters of appreciation, and similar documents on the DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the applicant's service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013170



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013170



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016584

    Original file (20130016584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * completion of the Infantry School and Air Assault School * award of the Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal * his service during Operation Desert Storm and all corresponding medals 2. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 years, 8 months, and 7 days of active service. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020120

    Original file (20130020120.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Certificate of Appreciation (Somalia) * Certificate of Service (Operation Vigilant Warrior) * Certificate of Achievement (Operation Vigilant Warrior in Southwest Asia) * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) and certificate showing award of the Army Commendation Medal CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Certificate, dated 29 March 1996, awarding him the Army Commendation Medal for service from 18 November 1992 to 18 June 1994, by Permanent Orders (PO) Number 92-9,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015142

    Original file (20080015142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was promoted effective 21 June 1985. Therefore, notwithstanding the opinion provided by HRC-STL, the applicant's correct effective date of promotion to staff sergeant was 1 June 1985 and it is appropriate to correct item 12h of his DD Form 214 to read 1985 06 01 instead of 1985 06 21. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. changing his effective date of promotion to staff sergeant/pay grade E-6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019482

    Original file (20120019482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no recommendations, certificates, or orders in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (previously known as the Official Military Personnel File) that show he was awarded the ARCOM or AAM. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001745

    Original file (20140001745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. he completed Airborne training; b. he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Combat Patch for service during mission Urgent Fury in Grenada, six awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and awards of the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM) for service in Grenada in 1983 and for security operations in Fort Indiantown Gap, PA during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003352

    Original file (20140003352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the Army Commendation Medal and the Drivers Badge. The applicant states, in effect, he discovered these awards were omitted from his DD Form 214 when he recently ordered his military personnel records. The applicant provides: * Permanent Orders (PO) Number 216-18, dated 7 December 1988 * PO Number 34-1, dated 2 June 1989 * certificate for award of the Army Commendation Medal *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003698

    Original file (20110003698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was promoted to pay grade E-5. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was promoted to pay grade E-5 because he was recommended for promotion, but when he was reassigned his records were lost and, as a result, he was not promoted. c. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-5 during the period of service under review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003262

    Original file (20150003262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (2nd Award) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (2nd Award). The applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was awarded an ARCOM (2nd Award) and an AAM (2nd Award) is supported by the evidence in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018221

    Original file (20110018221.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) awarded on 17 June 2011 be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant provides: * self-authored statements * ARCOM Certificate * DA Form 638-1 (Recommendation for Award) * emails * memorandum for record, dated 22 June 2011 * letter, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, dated 13 July 2011 * Orders Number 196-2220, Headquarters, U.S. Army Maneuver Center of Excellence, Fort Benning, GA, dated...