Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018235
Original file (20120018235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  30 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120018235 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/pay grade as major (MAJ)/O4 instead of captain (CPT)/O3.  

2.  The applicant states while on terminal leave he was promoted to MAJ under Orders Number 294-035 with an effective date and date of rank of 1 November 2004.  He was separated on 29 November 2004.  His promotion was prior to his separation date.  He only recently located his order promoting him to MAJ and feels this is the rank that should be shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his MAJ promotion orders and DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was appointed in the U.S. Army Reserve as a second lieutenant on 14 May 1994.  He entered active duty on the same day.

3.  He was promoted to CPT with an effective date and date of rank of 1 June 1998.

4.  Orders Number 254-0271 issued by XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg, on 10 September 2004, initiated his discharge processing and reassignment to the transition center with a discharge date of 29 November 2004.

5.  Order Number 294-035 issued by the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, on 20 October 2004, announced his promotion to MAJ with an effective date and date of rank of 1 November 2004.  The orders state the promotion was not valid and will be revoked if the officer concerned is not in promotable status on the effective date of promotion.

6.  He was honorably discharged from active duty on 29 November 2004, for Miscellaneous/General Reasons.  He was credited with completing 10 years, 6 months, and 16 days of net active service.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – CPT
* Item 4b (Pay Grade) – 03
* Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 1 June 1998

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) provides instructions for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states items 4a, 4b, and 12h would list the rank, grade, and the date of rank of the individual's promotion or reduction to the rank/grade in which the individual was serving on the effective date of release, separation, or discharge from active duty.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-29 (Officer Promotions) prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of active duty officers.  This regulation stated:

* Paragraph 1-12d – An officer who is on a promotion list and is removed from the active duty list (ADL) prior to the effective date of promotion shall not be promoted from the ADL promotion list
* Paragraph 1-18 – Officers accepting promotion to MAJ are required to serve satisfactorily 6 months in the new grade in order to separate in the higher grade



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that in September 2004 discharge processing was initiated for him with a discharge date of 29 November 2004.  Orders were issued on 20 October 2004 announcing his promotion to MAJ with an effective date and date of rank of 1 November 2004.  He was discharged on 29 November 2004.

2.  Prior to his discharge he had not completed the required 6 months satisfactory service in the grade of MAJ in order to separate in the higher grade.  He was properly issued a DD Form 214 showing in his rank/pay grade as CPT/O3.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as MAJ/O4.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018235





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018235



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012288

    Original file (20080012288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 October 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012288 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 25 August 2008 be corrected to show he was promoted to major/pay grade O4 effective 30 May 2008. The applicant states that he was promoted to major...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010368

    Original file (20090010368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his DA Form 61 (Application for Appointment), his DD Form 71 (Oath of Office), a memorandum from the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now known as HRC), and a copy of U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Readiness Command Orders M-203-0001, dated 22 July 2003, as documentary evidence in support of his request. Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 14 November 1989, shows he was discharged from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001926

    Original file (20140001926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214, DFAS records, and TRICARE/medical records were not corrected to show he was promoted to MAJ because he was promoted just prior to his retirement. While orders were published showing he was promoted to MAJ effective 1 August 2012, the law states that to retire in the grade of MAJ he would have had to serve six months in that grade. While it is appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his rank as MAJ, his DFAS and TRICARE/medical records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017323

    Original file (20090017323.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The promotion orders which show the applicant was promoted to major on 2 October 2007 with a DOR of 2 October 2007 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items 4a, 4b, and 12h on the applicant's DD Form 214. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002860

    Original file (20110002860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was promoted to LTC/O-5 and retired from active duty in that grade because orders were issued promoting him to LTC while he was on transition leave and prior to his separation date. Records show that USAHRC issued orders promoting the applicant to LTC/O-5 effective 1 December 2009. The evidence of record shows that in order to retire in the rank/grade of LTC/O-5, an officer must satisfactorily serve in the new...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010905

    Original file (20080010905.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his rank on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 15 February 2007 be corrected to show captain/pay grade O3. The applicant provides a copy of his promotion orders to the rank of captain and his DD Form 214. The promotion orders and records at HRC-ALEX are sufficient evidence to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was released from active duty on 15 February 2007 as a captain/pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073077C070403

    Original file (2002073077C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the processing of this case, the United States Total Army Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, provided an advisory opinion from the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Special Actions Branch, recommending that the applicant's request be denied. AGR officers who are selected for promotion by a mandatory promotion board, but who are not assigned to a position in the higher grade will be promoted on the date of assignment/attachment to a higher graded position or the day after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010732

    Original file (20130010732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    HRC, Officer Promotions Branch has stated that the applicant's separation on 22 July 2012 was after the approval date of her respective board and there was no proof she was in a non-promotable status on the effective date of her separation; therefore, the active duty promotion orders should stand and her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show her rank as CPT. Based on this correction, Orders Number C-02-302825, dated 15 February 2013, issued by HRC, should be amended to list her rank as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000391

    Original file (20140000391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Orders S144-4, dated 27 July 1981 * his DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 with an effective date of 30 November 1981 shows his rank as SFC and his pay grade as E-7. This regulation states that the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered in Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013773

    Original file (20090013773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he held the rank/grade of captain (CPT)/pay grade O-3 at the time of his discharge instead of first lieutenant (1LT)/ pay grade O-2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to CPT/O-3 on 1 June 2009 and held this rank/grade at the time of his discharge on 6 June 2009. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct...