IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 29 January 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120012396
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) and his Certification of Military Service to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice corporal (CPL)/E-4.
2. The applicant states, in effect, he was stationed in Germany when his unit sent him to the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Academy in Munich. When he returned from the NCO Academy he was informed he would not be receiving SGT pay. He asked his sergeant to speak with the commanding officer. Four days later he received a SGT uniform.
3. The applicant provides:
* Letter, National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 17 May 2012
* Standard Form (SF) 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records), dated 30 April 2012
* DD Form 214
* Self-authored statement
* Certificate of Completion, NCO Academy, dated 10 October 1952
* Certification of Military Service
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants military records are not available for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members records at the NPRC in 1973. It is believed that the applicants records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 July 1950 and held military occupational specialty 3256 (Welder).
4. He provided a certificate of proficiency, issued by the Seventh Army NCO Academy, on 10 October 1952. The certificate was issued to certify he satisfactorily completed a six-week course in tactics, leadership, and administration.
5. His record contains Special Orders Number 145, issued by Headquarters, Fort Devens, MA, on 9 July 1953, that list his rank as CPL.
6. He provided his DD Form 214, of which large portions are difficult or impossible to clearly interpret; however, this form shows:
* he entered active duty on 11 July 1950
* he was promoted to the temporary rank/grade of CPL/E-4 on 5 May 1951
* he completed 3 years, 2 months, and 19 days of total net service for pay purposes
* he completed 1 year and 28 days of foreign service
* he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal (Germany)
* he was honorably discharged from active duty on 10 July 1953
7. He provided a certification of military service, issued on 22 August 1997. This form lists his rank/grade as CPL/E-4.
8. Army Regulation 615-5 (Appointment and Reduction of NCOs and PFCs), in effect at the time, provided that enlisted Soldiers who were eligible for promotion would be recommended in writing, approved by the appropriate authority, and orders issued confirming the promotion. It also stated that unit commanders were authorized to exceed their authorized allotments in any grade by the number of vacancies that existed in a higher grade pending the promotion of the best-qualified candidate(s).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. At the time of the applicants service Army regulations stipulated that eligible Soldiers had to be recommended for promotion in writing, that the recommendation had to be approved, and orders had to be issued to confirm the promotion. Unfortunately, his records do not contain a promotion recommendation or promotion orders for SGT.
2. Regrettably, there is no evidence in his available military record and the applicant provided insufficient evidence to show he is entitled to promotion to SGT. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis on which to correct his DD Form 214 and Certification of Military Service to show his rank/grade as SGT/E-5.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120012396
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120012396
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018223
Counsel requests correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 as follows: * Item 3 (Grade-Rate-Rank and Date of Appointment) to show staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 vice sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 24 April 1954 * Item 5 (Qualification) (Specialty Number and Symbol) to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 1502 (Administrative Noncommissioned Officer (NCO)), and (Related Civilian Occupation and Dictionary Occupational Titles (DOT) Number) to show the appropriate entry * Item 17 ((Means of Entry) to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023587
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) as follows: * Item 3 (Grade - Rate - Rank and Date of Appointment) to show he was appointed as a corporal (CPL) on 12 October 1952 instead of 1953 * Item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) to, in effect, list the correct date * Item 38 (Remarks) to show his permanent grade as private first class (PFC) instead of private (PV2) 2. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003580
The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that his father's records be corrected to show entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROKPUC), and Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM); and that he be provided a correction to the FSM's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) that includes these awards. Further, his NPRC file...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013670
Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, established uniform administrative procedures and separation forms to be used in connection with the relief from active duty or complete separation of enlisted and warrant/commissioned officer personnel. If the grade at the time of separation was not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank if different from the date of appointment is entered in item 38. The evidence of record shows that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000391
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT). The applicant states that he was promoted to the rank of corporal prior to being captured as a prisoner of war (POW) and should have been promoted to the rank of SGT upon his repatriation. The applicant's military records are not available for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000790
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show that he was discharged in the rank of sergeant (SGT). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021326
Army regulations clearly state the requirement for award of the Army of Occupation Medal is that one must serve in Japan for 30 consecutive days during the period 3 September 1945 to 27 April 1952. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. e. The Republic of Korea War Service Medal is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003271
The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. His DD Form 214 shows: * he was promoted to the temporary rank of corporal on 11 November 1951 * he completed 11 months and 6 days of foreign service * he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 1 bronze service star * United Nations Service Medal * Army of Occupation Medal (Japan) 5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011840
There is no evidence in the available personnel records that show he was promoted back to or recommended for promotion to the rank and pay grade of "SGT/ E-5" prior to his separation from active duty. The applicant's GSA Form 6954 (Certification of Military Service) shows his last grade, rank, or rating as "Private." There also is insufficient evidence to correct item 3a, of his DD Form 214, to show the entry "SGT/E-5", as requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012692
The applicant provides a PH Certificate, dated 3 June 1986, which shows he was awarded the PH for being wounded in action in Korea on 30 July 1952. Lacking any derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification that would have precluded the applicant from receiving the AGCM, it is concluded the applicant completed a period of qualifying honorable service that entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...