Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013670
Original file (20080013670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        02 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013670 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of corporal (CPL)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states that during the last 3 months of his military service, he performed duties of acting SGT because promotions were frozen at the time.  He adds that he believes he deserves to be promoted to SGT and have his records corrected to reflect this promotion.

3.  The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his request:

	a.  DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), dated 25 September 1953;

	b.  DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 30 April 2008;

	c.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia, Permanent Order 121-15 and certificate, dated 30 April 2008, showing award of the Purple Heart;

	d.  Certificate of Recognition (Cold War Certificate);

	e.  Republic of Korea Letter of Appreciation, dated 25 June 2000;

	f.  Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 23 January 1959;
	g.  DA Form 493 (Separation Qualification Record), dated 25 September 1953;

	h.  Headquarters, Antilles Command, U.S. Army Caribbean, Fort Brooke, Puerto Rico, memorandum, dated 6 February 1959;

	i.  Headquarters, 7502d AU Personnel Center, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, letter of transfer or return to Reserve Component, dated 25 September 1953;

	j.  Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) notification of transfer of records, dated 2 February 1961; and 

	k.  Letter, dated 25 June 2008, from the applicant's member of Congress.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  With prior enlisted service, the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on 22 January 1952 in the rank/grade of private (PVT)/E-1, and that he was trained in military occupational specialty 1745 (Light Weapons Infantryman).  This form also shows the applicant's most significant assignment was with B Company, 14th Infantry Regiment.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 further shows that he completed 1 year, 8 months, and 4 days of creditable military service during the period covered by the DD Form 214, 1 year and 21 days of which was foreign service.  He was honorably separated and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group on 25 September 1953.

5.  Item 3 (Grade, Rate, Rank, and Date of Appointment) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "CPL(T) 10 FEB 53," indicating that he was appointed to the temporary rank of CPL on 10 February 1953.

6.  Item 38 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "Item #3 Pvt-2(P) 22 May 52," indicating that the highest permanent rank/grade the applicant attained was private (PV2)/E-2 effective 22 May 1952.

7.  There is no indication in the applicant's records that he was appointed as a SGT or as an acting SGT.  Additionally, there are no special orders in his records that show he was promoted or advanced to SGT.

8.  The applicant submitted a copy of his DA Form 493, dated 25 September 1953.  Item 18 (Grade Held) of this form shows he held the grade of CPL at the time he was separated.

9.  The applicant also submitted a copy of Headquarters, Antilles Command, memorandum dated 6 February 1959, which shows that he was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve on 23 January 1959 in the rank of CPL.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, established uniform administrative procedures and separation forms to be used in connection with the relief from active duty or complete separation of enlisted and warrant/commissioned officer personnel.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with complete and accurate documentary evidence of their military service.  This regulation specified that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training.  Item 3 of the version in effect at the time showed the grade in which an enlisted Soldier was serving at the time of separation with an indication whether it was a permanent or a temporary grade.  Additionally, this block also shows the date of rank for the grade shown.  If the date of rank is different from the date of appointment, the date of appointment is entered in item 38.  If the grade at the time of separation was not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank if different from the date of appointment is entered in item 38.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was appointed to the temporary rank of CPL on 10 February 1953.  This temporary rank is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.  There is no evidence that the applicant performed duties of a SGT or that he was appointed, advanced, or promoted to SGT.  The evidence of record further shows that the highest permanent rank the applicant attained was that of PV2/E-2 on 22 May 1952.  There is no evidence that the applicant was advanced or permanently appointed beyond the rank of PV2.

2.  There is no evidence in the available records nor did the applicant provide documentation to substantiate his SGT/E-5 grade.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________XXX________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013670



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013670



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023587

    Original file (20110023587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) as follows: * Item 3 (Grade - Rate - Rank and Date of Appointment) to show he was appointed as a corporal (CPL) on 12 October 1952 instead of 1953 * Item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) to, in effect, list the correct date * Item 38 (Remarks) to show his permanent grade as private first class (PFC) instead of private (PV2) 2. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011486

    Original file (20090011486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Contrary to the applicant’s belief that his DD Form 214 was reconstructed, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued two DD Forms 214 during his military service. With respect to the applicant’s rank at time of entry on active duty, the evidence of record shows that at the time of his induction and entry on active duty, the applicant held the rank/grade of PVT/E-1 which is correctly shown in item 18 of his first DD Form 214. With respect to his rank/grade at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006584

    Original file (20090006584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's reconstructed record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 29 October 1948 and was discharged on 30 May 1951 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. With respect to the applicant's rank/grade, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to the permanent rank/grade of PV2/E-2 on 20 August 1953.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068497C070402

    Original file (2002068497C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged in the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant states that he was discharged in the rank of private/E-2 but had been promoted to the rank of PFC on 26 July 1954. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was REFRAD on 20 January 1955, in the temporary rank and pay grade of PFC E-3 (T), with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004798

    Original file (20150004798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090000030, on 16 June 2009. There is no evidence and he did not provide any evidence to show he was promoted to or was serving in the rank of SGT at the time of his discharge on 4 April 1952.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008697

    Original file (20120008697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show: * his rank as corporal (CPL) (permanent) * he completed the Airborne Infantry School and Geneva Conventions of 1949 training 2. There is no evidence of record and he provided insufficient evidence to show he never served as a labor foreman during his period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005732C070205

    Original file (20060005732C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records at this time to show his award of the Purple Heart. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 23 December 1952; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 22 December 1955. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071122C070402

    Original file (2002071122C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In March 1952, he submitted a request to appear before an ORC board to be considered for appointment as a commissioned officer. He indicated that the request was not favorably considered because the FSM was eligible for consideration for an appointment in the ORC under current regulations and that the authority to do so had been delegated to Army commanders in the area in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016764

    Original file (20100016764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 29 August 1952 through 29 August 1955. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008201C080407

    Original file (20070008201C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the CIB and to add this award to his record and separation document at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge, for his qualifying infantry service in Korea; b. awarding...