Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000391
Original file (20150000391 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000391 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT).

2.  The applicant states that he was promoted to the rank of corporal prior to being captured as a prisoner of war (POW) and should have been promoted to the rank of SGT upon his repatriation.  He goes on to state that others were promoted but he was not.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 January 1949 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was transferred to Korea for assignment to Company A, 9th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division. 

4.  The applicant was advanced to the rank of private first class (PFC) on 24 March 1950 and was serving in that rank when he was captured by hostile forces on 30 November 1950.  He was repatriated on 23 April 1953. 

5.  On 1 May 1953, he was promoted to the rank of corporal (CPL) with a date of rank of 29 December 1950, the day prior to his capture in accordance with Department of the Army General order Number 39, dated 1 May 1953.

6.  On 31 December 1953, he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List in the rank of CPL.  He had served 4 years, 10 months and 28 days of active service of which 2 years, 9 months and 19 days were foreign service.

7.  Department of the Army General order Number 39, dated 1 May 1953 provided, in pertinent part, that enlisted personnel below the grade of master sergeant who on 1 May 1953 are in a missing in action or captured by hostile forces status which commenced prior to 2 April 1953 and who have completed the time in grade requirements for promotion to the next higher grade are automatically promoted effective 1 May 1953 to the temporary grade next above that held on date of entry into a missing in action or captured status.  The date of rank will be the day prior to entering into that status.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be promoted to the rank of SGT based on his being a POW in Korea has been noted and found to lack merit. 

2.  The applicant was serving in the rank of PFC when he was captured on 30 November 1950 and when he was repatriated he was promoted to the rank of CPL on 1 May 1953 with a date of rank of 29 December 1950 in accordance with directives in effect at the time. 

3.  Inasmuch as the applicant received a one pay grade promotion following his repatriation, he is not entitled to another promotion to the rank of SGT.
4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request for a promotion to SGT.   

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Korean War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000391





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000391



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021746

    Original file (20120021746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated he was promoted to SGT effective 1 May 1953 per Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 39 and he was paid at that grade from 1 May 1953 through his discharge date on 20 October 1953. None of the applicant's military records is available for review with this case. In November 1955, by letter, the Settlements Division, Finance Center, U.S. Army, notified him that in regard to his claim for payment of the difference in pay between the grade of CPL and SGT, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024052

    Original file (20100024052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states the applicant was promoted to SGT according to records from the Provost Marshal General's Office and other documentation that are included with his application. Evidence shows the applicant's discharge document does not contain this entry. The Board requests that the ARBA, CMD – Promulgation provide administrative relief by adding to Item 55 (Remarks) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 "PRISONER OF WAR, Company E, 12th Infantry, 20 December 1944 to June 1945" and providing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511167C070209

    Original file (9511167C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Those who were prisoners of war for less than 18 months were considered on an individual basis.” EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records may have been lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. War Department Message, dated 21 September 1945, Subject: POW Promotions (also known as Project R), directed that soldiers who were POW's for 18 months or longer, under honorable conditions, would receive a promotion of one grade if not previously promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003779C070205

    Original file (20060003779C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart and that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his time as a Prisoner of War (POW). Medical documents prepared at the time of his repatriation on 15 August 1953 clearly indicate that the applicant was wounded on the date of his capture by enemy forces in Korea on 27 April 1951. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103091C070208

    Original file (2004103091C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Letters from TAGO representatives dated 12 July 1946, 17 December 1946 and 6 September 1950 and a first endorsement, dated 14 September 1950, all indicate the applicant’s records confirmed he was promotion to PFC on 1 April 1944, CPL on 23 August 1945 and that there was no record found to show he was ever promoted to SGT while serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to CPL on 23 August 1945 under a special POW promotion policy and that he held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088559C070403

    Original file (2003088559C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was a POW from 15 February 1951 to 18 February 1951, a period of three days. There is no evidence which shows the applicant was in a promotable status prior to his POW status. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096106C070212

    Original file (03096106C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Unfortunately the individual pay record provided by the applicant and the POW medical history, which the applicant completed in 1983, is not supported by any other documents available to the Board, including his original final payment voucher, which the applicant authenticated with the notation that he had been promoted to the rank of private first class on 29 September 1945. As such, in the absence of more...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012503

    Original file (20140012503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to award of the POW Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. He served during a qualifying period of service in Korea for entitlement to the Republic of Korea War Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM: (1) the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in action in North Korea on 7 June 1952; (2) the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008544

    Original file (20130008544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1950 through 5 October 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1950 through 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022198

    Original file (20100022198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM) is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953. While the exact dates cannot be determined, the available evidence shows the applicant was captured by enemy forces in February 1951 and he remained a POW until he was repatriated in August 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...