Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010256
Original file (20120010256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  15 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010256 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her married name rather than her maiden name.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, she was married on 7 April 2012 and would like her DD Form 214 to show her married name.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Department of Veterans Affairs Identification Card
* Military Retiree Identification Card
* Social Security Card
* Marriage Certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 March 2003.  She completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 35N (Signals Intelligence Analyst).  The highest rank/grade she attained while on active duty was staff sergeant/E-6.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) shows she reenlisted on 2 September 2005 using her maiden name.

3.  On 30 September 2009, the applicant was honorably retired due to a permanent disability.  She completed 6 years, 9 months, and 26 days of creditable active military service.  The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows her maiden name. 

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  In states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request for correction of her DD Form 214 to show her married name was carefully considered.

2.  Records show the applicant was married on 7 April 2012 and subsequently changed her last name.  However, this does not change the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time her service records were created.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record her married name in her military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.

4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the name difference recorded in her military record and to satisfy her desire to have her married name documented in her AMHRR.






5.  However, if it is the applicant's retired pay records that she wishes to update the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) has stated in previous cases that it is their policy to refer retirees to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command to approve a name change.  The applicant should therefore provide supporting documentation to:  Commander, Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDR-VI, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122 requesting approval of her name change and inform DFAS when it has been approved.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010256



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010256



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021704

    Original file (20120021704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021704 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She states, in effect, she is divorced and she would like her retirement DD Form 214 to reflect her maiden name. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows she enlisted using her maiden name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019267

    Original file (20110019267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The documents contained in her military records show she served under the last name of G____. Her records do not show she changed her last name at the time to S____. She provides documentation showing she changed her last name after her discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008745

    Original file (20120008745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 15 November 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120008745 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of her records to show her last name change. The evidence shows the applicant changed her last name on 2 April 2012, which was subsequent to her 30 November 2001 retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010342

    Original file (20130010342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests her records be corrected to show her married last name. Evidence shows she married in March 2013 and apparently changed her last name, almost 2 years after her retirement on 30 April 2011.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004700

    Original file (20140004700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as R____. The applicant provides her marriage license, DD Form 214, DD Form 2 (Armed Forces of the United States Identification Card – U.S. Army Retired), and social security card. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004974

    Original file (20120004974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to reflect her name change. Her last name changed from "Bar__" to "Mor__" in her service records; however, her name was then recorded in her service records as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__." The applicant's service personnel records show: * she enlisted under her maiden name of "Bar__, Kar__ Eli__" * her name for an unknown reason was changed in marriage to "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" * she retired as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007774

    Original file (20140007774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that her military records be corrected to reflect her new name. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001678

    Original file (20150001678 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of her: * Marriage License * Retirement Orders * DD Form 2 (United States Uniformed Service Identification (ID) Card) (Retired) * DD Form 1173 (United States Uniformed Service ID and Privilege Card) * DFAS-CL 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provided a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025894

    Original file (20100025894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to reflect her last name of “K----t.” 2. The applicant states that she married on 26 June 2010 and changed her maiden name of "O---n" to “K----t” and desires her records to be changed accordingly. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.