Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019267
Original file (20110019267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  12 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019267 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her last name shown in her records from her maiden name to her married name.

2.  The applicant states she maintained her maiden name while serving on active duty and now that she is retired she wishes to change her records to reflect her married name.  There is no error, but she was told by staff members of the Retirement Services Office that this is the method used to document her married name change and change her name in the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFASs) records.

3.  She provides:

* marriage license
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* U.S. Uniformed Services Identification Card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military record shows she was appointed in the U.S. Army Reserve in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT) on 8 August 1988.  She was commissioned in the Regular Army in the rank of 2LT on 4 September 1988.

2.  At the time of her appointment and commission, she entered active service under the last name of G____.  The documents contained in her military records show she served under the last name of G____.
3.  She provides a copy of her marriage license which shows she was married on 27 October 2000.  Her records do not show she changed her last name at the time to S____.

4.  She was honorably retired in the rank of lieutenant colonel on 30 September 2010.  Item 1 (Last Name – First Name – Middle Name) of her DD Form 214 shows her last name as G____.

5.  She provides documentation showing she changed her last name after her discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in and was discharged in the last name shown in her records and on her DD Form 214.  Notwithstanding the fact that she married during her active duty service, there is no evidence she changed her last name during that time, and she acknowledges that she did not change her name.  Therefore, her military records and DD Form 214 are correct as currently constituted and there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

2.  While her desire to have her records changed is understandable, there is no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army's records.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.

3.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in her record.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in her last name and to satisfy her desire to have her current name documented in her records.

4.  However, if it is applicant's retired pay records that she wishes to update, DFAS has stated in previous cases that it is their policy to refer retirees to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command to approve a name change.  The applicant should therefore provide supporting documentation to:  Commander, Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDR-VI, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122 requesting they approve her name change and inform DFAS when it has been approved.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  _____X___  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019267



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019267



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021704

    Original file (20120021704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021704 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She states, in effect, she is divorced and she would like her retirement DD Form 214 to reflect her maiden name. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows she enlisted using her maiden name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010256

    Original file (20120010256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her married name rather than her maiden name. The applicant’s DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) shows she reenlisted on 2 September 2005 using her maiden name. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004974

    Original file (20120004974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to reflect her name change. Her last name changed from "Bar__" to "Mor__" in her service records; however, her name was then recorded in her service records as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__." The applicant's service personnel records show: * she enlisted under her maiden name of "Bar__, Kar__ Eli__" * her name for an unknown reason was changed in marriage to "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" * she retired as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025894

    Original file (20100025894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to reflect her last name of “K----t.” 2. The applicant states that she married on 26 June 2010 and changed her maiden name of "O---n" to “K----t” and desires her records to be changed accordingly. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005673

    Original file (20110005673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. It states that the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214 will be the ORB, separation approval authority documentation, separation orders, or any other document authorized for filing in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, the documents provided by the applicant are insufficient evidence to warrant a change to the name in her official military service records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003761

    Original file (20140003761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states she got married after she got out of the service. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008363

    Original file (20130008363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as "Norman" instead of "Howard." The evidence of record shows the applicant's last name was "Norman" at the time of her initial enlistment in the Regular Army; however, prior to her release from active duty she married on 9 March 1982 and changed her last name to "Howard" as shown on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 1982. ABCMR Record of Proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021275

    Original file (20120021275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as "G____" vice "B____" and to add award of the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence in the available records that shows she was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct her DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022029

    Original file (20120022029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military service records to show her last name as "D----." Her DD Form 214 shows her last name as "J---" (i.e., the last name she requested and that was recorded in her official records at the time), and she signed the document with that last name. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, the documentation provided by the applicant is insufficient...