Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004700
Original file (20140004700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004700 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as R____.

2.  The applicant states she was married on 7 December 2013.

3.  The applicant provides her marriage license, DD Form 214, DD Form 2 (Armed Forces of the United States Identification Card – U.S. Army Retired), and social security card.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 March 1989 under the last name P____.  On 14 December 1992, she reenlisted under the last name M____.  A review of her records shows she used this last name for the remainder of her active duty service.

3.  She retired on 31 March 2009.  Her DD Form 214 shows her last name as M____.

4.  She provides a copy of her marriage certificate, retiree identification card, and social security card that all show her current last name as R____.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A review of the applicant's records shows she initially served under the last name P____.  On 14 December 1992, she reenlisted under the last name M____ and served under the last name M____ until her retirement in 2009.  

2.  While it is understandable that she now desires to record her current name on her DD Form 214, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records.  

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.

4.  She is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in her military records.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the difference in the name recorded in her military records and the name shown on her retiree identification card and social security card.

5.  If she wishes to update her retired pay records, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) has stated in previous cases that it is their policy to refer retirees to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to approve a name change.  She should therefore provide supporting documentation to:  Commander, HRC, ATTN:  AHRC-PDR-VI, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122, requesting approval of her name change and inform DFAS when that action has been approved.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ______________X___________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018335



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004700



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016314

    Original file (20140016314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his DD Form 214 shows his name as "R____ M____ H____." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the name on his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the name that is listed on his DD Form 4/1. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013711

    Original file (20140013711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She has tried several times to have it changed on her DD Form 214. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940. Awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for service from 26 January 1971 - 25 January 1974. c. List the following awards on the reissued DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 January 1974: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010965

    Original file (20110010965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married surname. Her DD Form 214 shows: a. in item 1 (Name – Last, First, Middle) – "S____, D____ A____" and b. in item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated) – the applicant signed the document. As such, the document provided by the applicant is insufficient evidence to warrant a change to the name in her official military service records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020133

    Original file (20110020133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014172

    Original file (20110014172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010035

    Original file (20140010035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Previous application to this Board and a failure to exhaust letter * Letter dated 23 May 2014 from DFAS to her Member of Congress * DD Form 2656, dated 15 November 2012 * DD Form 2656-6, dated 7 January 2014 * Copy of her military identification card * Letter, dated 6 February 2014, to an RSO in Monterey, CA * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * Letter from DFAS-Retired and Annuity Pay,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015823

    Original file (20140015823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    h. DFAS letter to the applicant, dated 4 June 2014 (Exhibit L), that notified him of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay account based on documentation received from him. However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant notified DFAS concerning an error in his SBP coverage from the time that he retired from the U.S. Army on 25 March 2009 through May 2014. On 4 June 2014, DFAS notified the applicant of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028161

    Original file (20100028161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her correct social security number (SSN). The evidence of record shows this SSN continued to be recorded in the applicant's official military service records throughout her entire military service. Despite this fact, the evidence of record shows the incorrect SSN was recorded in the applicant's military records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019750

    Original file (20130019750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her military records show her last name as "R-----." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the active Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her correct last name throughout the course of her military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009530

    Original file (20110009530.txt) Auto-classification: Denied