Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009726
Original file (20120009726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  4 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009726 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be "updated" to show all of her training and the exact dates of "tours."

2.  The applicant states the errors on these forms were most likely due to mistakes made by administrative personnel.  She needs the corrections to assist her with her Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits and medical care.  She completed an additional period of training and served in Panama and Guatemala, each for a period of 8 weeks.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214, one page of a National Guard Retirement Points Annual Statement, an NGB Form 23 (Army National Guard Retirement Credits Record), and a Social Security Administration award letter.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Louisiana Army National Guard ARNG on 17 October 1980.  She entered initial active duty training (IADT) on 2 February 1981, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64C (Motor Transport Operator).

3.  She was released from active duty and returned to her ARNG unit on 2 June 1981.  Her DD Form 214 shows completion of Motor Transport Operator's training.

4.  The applicant's NGB Form 23 and ARNG Annual Statements show ARNG service from 17 October 1980 through 16 October 1995.  Except for her 137 days of IADT and a 31 day period in 1986, the applicant is not shown to have had any active duty service other than her two-week periods of annual training. 

5.  Her NGB Form 22 provides the following:

	a.  ARNG service from 17 October 1980 through 16 October 1995; and

	b.  completion of Motor Transport Operator course (1981), Primary Leadership Development Course (1986), and Carpentry and Masonry Specialist course (1990).

6.  The record does not show any periods of service in either Panama or Guatemala.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  

	a.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

	b.  A DD Form 214 is issued to Reserve component (RC) Soldiers who complete IADT with award of an MOS, complete 90 days or more of continuous 
active duty for training, Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, Active Guard Reserve service, and RC Soldiers who were mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The ABCMR does not have the authority to correct the NGB Form 22.  This is a State document reflecting her service in the ARNG.  Issues related to this form must be addressed to the Louisiana Army National Guard Office of the State Adjutant General or the NGB.  

2.  The applicant was issued a DD Form 214 upon her release from active duty following her IADT.  This is the only period of active duty Federal service of record, as such it is the only period for which a DD Form 214 is authorized.

3.  The applicant's additional periods of active duty training were less than the required 90 days in duration for issuance of a DD Form 214.

4.  The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any evidence that she had any service in Panama or Guatemala.  Even if she did serve in either of these two locations her reported period of service would be insufficient to warrant issuance of a DD Form 214.

5.  The DD Form 214 is a static document, reflecting a Soldier's service as of the date of release from active duty.  The items the applicant is seeking to be added did not occur while she was on active duty but as a part of her ARNG service and as such no correction to the applicant's record is warranted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
         
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009726





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009726



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021734

    Original file (20140021734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states when she enlisted in the ARNG she signed two contracts. The applicant enlisted in the VAARNG under the RFP enlistment option for 1 year on 10 August 2009. The NGB official stated: * the applicant's contract/bonus addendum was signed after the enlistment which violates the ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06, dated 1 March 2009 * she failed to initial all required statements on the addendum which also violates the ARNG SRIP * her DD Form 4 and DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000874

    Original file (20140000874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show she enlisted in the VAARNG under the RFP enlistment option for 1 year on 10 August 2009. Applicants who are eligible for enlistment but cannot ship to their initial active duty for training (IADT) for more than 120 days after becoming eligible to enlist in the ARNG will contract in the Inactive National Guard (ING) and are assigned to the RFP of the Recruiting and Retention Command. She returned to the MEPS again on 2 June 2010 and she executed two Addenda: The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004751C070206

    Original file (20050004751C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    John Mueller | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his Guatemala Meritorious Service Award, his Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development (NCOPD) Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and the Army Service Ribbon (ASR). Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000133

    Original file (20090000133.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 21 March 2006, hereafter referred to as the subject DD Form 214, be corrected to show she entered an active duty status at the end of February 2005 instead of 9 April 2005. She also requests that the DD Form 214 be corrected to show all of her active duty service. There is no DD Form 214 in the applicant’s record for this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020160

    Original file (20120020160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * Correction of her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show a date earlier than 23 December 1980 * Correction of item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" vice "No" 2. The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 28 March 1980 and she was separated from the USAR on 22 December 1980 for the purpose of enlisting in the ARNG. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526

    Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service." Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized even though they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088635C070403

    Original file (2003088635C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1-year period. At the time the applicant enlisted in the MDARNG on 2 February 1980, he knew he was enlisting in the Maryland Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army. The Board is sympathetic with the problems he alleges to have encountered with his grandparents' illnesses and their lack of transportation to get medical treatment when he enlisted; but...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014386

    Original file (20080014386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records as follows: a. correction of Item 7 (Date of Birth (DOB)) on her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 25 October 1997, to show her DOB as 26 December 1957 instead of 26 September 1957; b. correction of Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from "002 02 08" to the correct entry; and c. correction of her NGB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012639

    Original file (20140012639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show she enlisted in the WYARNG under the RFP enlistment option for 1 year on 12 October 2010. At that time, her recruiter requested BCN S10100001WY for her SLRP. Although her NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E is not available, she and her commander state that her recruiter requested a BCN at the time she entered the RFP instead of requesting it after she was released from the RFP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002097

    Original file (20150002097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that when the applicant extended her enlistment in the FLARNG for 6 years on 14 May 2011 for assignment to the 1218th Transportation Company in MOS 88M, her DA Form 4836 was not properly annotated to show she was extending for the SLRP in the amount of $50,000. In September 2014, the NGB stated an obsolete SLRP Addendum was used at the time of her extension, the BCN was requested after the date of her extension, and her entitlement to the SLRP should be...