IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 April 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120008291
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he was granted authorization to ship his household goods prior to the issuance of his discharge orders.
2. The applicant states he and his wife moved themselves in conjunction with his being discharged from the Army. However, he made the move prior to the publication of the orders authorizing his move. He argues that he had to move early because his lease was expiring and he could not renew it for such a short period of time. He also contends that he did not know he could not move his household goods prior to receiving his orders.
3. The applicant provides copies of:
* Email communications with the Chief, Personal Property, Fort Leonard Wood, MO dated in March and April 2012
* Orders 065-1305, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, dated 5 March 2012
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. On 13 January 2010, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army. He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 91L (Construction Equipment Repairer).
2. On 1 September 2011, the applicant was advanced to specialist, pay
grade E-4.
3. An email communication provided by the applicant indicates that he had requested an exception to policy to move his household goods prior to receiving his discharge orders. This email further indicates that the Chief, Personal Property Office, had determined the applicant's lease was to expire soon. On
21 February 2012, the applicant moved his family back to his home of record. He also moved 8,200 pounds of household goods and had the weight tickets. His authorized maximum allowance of household goods was only 8,000 pounds. The applicant's request was denied by the U.S. Army, G-4 (Logistics Officer). He was advised that he could resubmit the request if he could secure a vocal authorization from his former commander, or he could apply to this Board for consideration.
4. Orders 065-1305, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, dated 5 March 2012, directed the applicant's discharge on 9 March 2012. These orders also authorized him to ship household goods at the dependent rate.
5. On 9 March 2012, the applicant was discharged in accordance with his orders. He had completed 2 years, 1 month, and 27 days of creditable active duty service.
6. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, Washington, DC. The opinion stated that the G-4 was unable to authorize reimbursement for the applicant's personally procured move of household goods because he had made the move prior to the issuance of orders. The general information that was provided to the applicant concerning his shipping of personal property was not considered as advice that the order was to be issued. However, the G-4 had no objection if this Board should decide to authorize such authorization and reimbursement.
7. Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) provides at paragraph U5330-G that a "prior to issuance of orders" is required for the transportation of household goods that are to be shipped prior to the actual publication of orders authorizing such shipment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show he was granted authorization to ship his household goods prior to the issuance of his discharge orders. He bases this request on his not knowing he had to have the orders before making the actual shipment.
2. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant completed the shipment of his household goods prior to the publication of orders authorizing such shipment. According to the JFTR, such shipments are not reimbursable. Therefore, no error has occurred in this case.
3. However, there was an injustice. The applicant had only been in the military for a short period of time and was trained as a construction equipment repairer. He could not reasonably be expected to know and understand the governing regulation concerning the shipment of household goods. The evidence shows that he had a very short time in which to accomplish his move which was complicated by the expiration of his lease. There is no evidence showing that he had received adequate counseling concerning his entitlements that included the movement of his family and personal property.
4. The applicant's discharge orders clearly authorized him to move his family and to ship his personal property. His maximum weight allowance was 8,000 pounds; however, he shipped 8,200 pounds. It would not be prudent to reimburse him for the excess weight he shipped.
5. Therefore, it would be appropriate to grant him the relief he is seeking by showing he was provided a "prior to issuance of orders" advice on or before
21 February 2012 authorizing him to ship his household goods prior to the actual publication of his discharge orders.
BOARD VOTE:
___x____ ____x___ ___x____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing he was provided a "prior to issuance of orders" advice on or before 21 February 2012 authorizing him to ship his household goods prior to the actual publication of his discharge orders;
b. showing that this advice was accepted as adequate proof of his authorization to ship his personal property; and
c. reimbursing him for the shipment of his full weight allowance of 8,000 pounds.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to reimbursing him for that portion of his shipment of household goods that exceeded 8,000 pounds.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120008291
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120008291
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328
The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010566
The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his PCS Orders; DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), dated 3 May 2006; DD Form 2278 (Application for DITY and Counseling Checklist); FHT Form 55-X25 (DITY Information Data Sheet); Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Travel Voucher, dated 12 May 2006, with a copy of his DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 May 2006; DFAS Travel Voucher, dated 11 May 2009; DITY Checklist and Certification of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00968
He was informed the total authorized weight of HHGs he could ship was 700 pounds. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: JPPSO-SAT/ECAF states that members in the grade of E-3, with dependents, are authorized a weight allowance of 8,000 pounds. He provided no additional evidence to support his claim, therefore, the reconsideration was denied.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081806C070215
In his request, he stated at the time of his enlistment, his recruiter stated he would arrange for the shipment of the applicant’s household goods. Army Regulation 600-4 provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the United States Army. In view of the facts of this case, the Board finds sufficient evidence to show that the late notification of the debt incurred by the applicant resulted in there being insufficient time...
According to JPPSO, the applicant’s HHG shipment exceeded the maximum authorized weight allowance and in accordance with paragraph U5340, JFTR, she is liable for all transportation costs arising from transportation of HHG in excess of the authorized allowance. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant, after the death of her husband, a former service member, shipped HHG from Virginia to Colorado with a net weight of 29,200 pounds, including 3,057 pounds for the shipment of a POV. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007125
The applicant states he was new to the military and not aware of the fact that he needed to attend a class and have orders prior to moving his household goods (HHG) to Fort Hood, Texas. The evidence clearly shows the applicant failed to follow established regulatory procedures and did not obtain proper authorization prior to procuring transportation of his HHG to his permanent duty station. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
d. Paragraph U-5330-G, JFTR provides, in part, for shipment of household goods in advance of orders, however, the Comptroller General has ruled that general information furnished to the member concerning issuance of orders before the determination is 2 AFBCMR 9 6 - 0 2 0 1 3 made to actually issue the orders (such as time of eventual release from active duty, time of expiration of term of service, date of eligibility for retirement, date of expected rotation from overseas duty) may not be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006637
The applicant requests reimbursement for his personally procured move (PPM) move from Fort Huachuca, AZ, to Fort Campbell, KY. 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving at Fort Huachuca when he was issued PCS orders in December 2014 reassigning him to Fort Campbell. On 19 December 2014, he was properly counseled at Fort Huachuca on the PPM program to include his entitlements, his responsibilities, and the documentation required to submit a claim for a PPM move.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022030
On 18 October 2012, after the applicant submitted a re-weight memorandum for record, officials at the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 and G-4, reviewed the applicant's request to waive the indebtedness resulting from exceeding his prescribed weight allowance. The documents provided by the applicant regarding his request for an increased HHG weight allowance during his PCS family move from Fort Wainwright, Alaska to Germany were reviewed. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-061
He argued that having to pay more than $6,000 above what he expected to pay for the overage because of misinformation he received from the Transportation Office is a sig- nificant injustice given that he “used an authorized government supported web site to calculate my overage cost as directed by a government expert.” APPLICABLE LAW Article 11.F. § 461, the Secretary may remit or cancel the debt of an enlisted member to the United States “when recovery would be against equity and good...