IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 January 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120007742
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that she be given a disability rating under the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES).
2. The applicant states that the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) did not give her a disability rating for a disability/functional limitation that she believes began while she was on active duty. She goes on to state that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gave her a 50% disability rating and she believes that she should have received a 50% rating from the PEB.
3. The applicant provides copies of her PEB Proceedings, the results of her Non-Duty Related Fitness Determination, a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), four pages of documents from her medical records, her orders assigning her to the Retired Reserve, her 20-year letter, copies of her medical records and a copy of her VA Rating Decision.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 December 1985 for a period of 4 years and training as a light wheel vehicle mechanic.
2. A DA Form 5181-R (Screening Note of Acute Medical Care) shows she was treated for a complaint of back and lower abdominal pain, noted she had stated she slipped off a 5-ton truck two weeks prior. In an attempt to catch herself, she twisted her body beyond normal. She had fallen off another 5-ton in the same manner while in the field. No other service medical records are available.
3. She served until she was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) at Fort Knox, Kentucky on 3 December 1989 due to the expiration of her term of service (ETS). She had served 4 years of active service and was transferred to a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Troop Program Unit at Fort Knox. She continued to serve and was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 1 March 2000.
4. On 5 October 2006, the applicant was issued a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter).
5. On 21 February 2007, a PEB was convened at Fort Lewis, Washington to render a fitness for duty determination of the applicants ability to perform her duties. The applicant was evaluated for degenerative arthritis of the thoracolumbar spine and it was noted that she had profile restrictions (no walking in boots, field gear or rucksack walk) that prohibited her from performing the majority of common Soldier tasks. The PEB found the applicant unfit without a disability rating as the case was adjudicated as a non-duty related case under the provisions of Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 1332.18 and DoD Instruction 1332.38 which requires that only a determination of fitness or unfitness be made.
6. On 25 June 2007, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve due to being medically disqualified not as a result of own misconduct.
7. On 30 July 2007, the applicant was granted a 10% disability rating by the VA for Lumbar Strain/Degenerative Disc Disease and Osteoarthritis.
8. On 13 June 2009, she was granted an increase to 40% by the VA for Lumbar Strain/Degenerative Disc Disease and Osteoarthritis.
9. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Under the laws governing the Army Physical Disability Evaluation system, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet several line of duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits. One of the criteria is that the disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or was the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.
10. Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.
11. Department of Defense Instruction 1332.38 directed that the Department of Defense Disability Evaluation System (DES) is established to conduct physical disability evaluations in a consistent and timely manner. Members of the Reserve Components who are not on a call to active duty of more than 30 days and who are medically diagnosed for impairment unrelated to the members military status and performance of duty shall be referred to the DES solely for a fitness determination upon request of the member or when directed by the Secretary concerned.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's fit for duty evaluation by the PEB and transfer to the Retired Reserve was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant's rights.
2. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted and the evidence of record that she was improperly diagnosed or evaluated by the PEB. There is simply insufficient evidence to show that her degenerative disc disease/arthritis was incurred while entitled to basic pay or is related to her 1988 injuries.
3. The fact that the VA, in its discretion, has awarded the applicant a disability rating is a prerogative exercised within the policies of that agency. It does not, in itself, establish any entitlement to additional disability compensation or medical retirement from the Army.
4. Accordingly, she was properly evaluated by the PEB and was properly transferred to the Retired Reserve in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations with no indication of any violations of his rights.
5. Therefore, in the absence of sufficient evidence to show the applicant was not properly diagnosed when she was evaluated by the PEB and transferred to the Retired Reserve in 2007, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007742
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007742
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083480C070212
She also contends that, when she was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), the initial informal PEB failed to note osteoarthritis of the foot and degenerative joint disease of the spine, either of which would have warranted at least a 10 percent disability rating and a finding of "unfit." Department of Defense Instruction 1332.38, paragraph E3.P6.2.4 states that conditions newly diagnosed during TDRL periodic physical examinations shall be compensable when the condition is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018403
The applicant requests an increase in the disability rating she received by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for a back injury incurred while she was on active duty and that she receive a rating for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). The board acknowledged that she has cognitive impairment consistent with TBI, but the condition was not found unfitting by the original PEB and because TBI does not arise out of either condition found unfitting (PTSD and cervical spine disease), the board could...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017142
The report noted she did not seek treatment for panic attacks and PTSD symptoms while serving in Iraq. (4) Refer the case to the Army Physical Disability Appeal Board. The record shows the applicant non-concurred with the informal PEB findings and recommendations and requested an appearance before a formal PEB.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01245
The NARSUM documented a normal neurological examination and ROM. The conditions adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB and that were also contended by the CI are right foot pain secondary to pes planus, plantar fasciitis, and fractured 4th phalanx, right shoulder bursitis, bilateral knee osteoarthritis, and DDD of the cervical spine. An MRI of the left knee on 8 May 2006 (2 months prior to separation) was normal.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00213
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the lumbosacral strain condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB NARSUMs record CI report that her depression was caused by back pain from the September 2006 injury. The 22 December 2008 occupational health pre-employment medical examination records CI report of “Some depression secondary to back pain”, and noted the history of low back pain with limitations...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018078
On 8 January 2014, the VA awarded him service-connected disability compensation for multiple conditions, including PTSD, TBI, migraine, degenerative joint disease (left shoulder and right knee), tinnitus, and other conditions. The presumption of fitness may be overcome when: (a) an illness or injury occurs within the presumptive period that would prevent the Service member from performing further duty if they were not retiring; (b) a serious deterioration of a previously diagnosed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011606
The MEB can find no evidence in the medical record that this condition interferes with the satisfactory performance of the applicant's duty and thus the MEB feels that this condition currently meets retention standards. He requested a physician, not associated with his MEB proceedings, be appointed to conduct an independent medical review. The PEB determined that his migraine aura without headache, as well as his other conditions listed on his MEB, were not unfitting.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008599
Further, the PEB found that the applicant's medical and physical impairments prevented her from reasonably performing the duties required by her rank and military specialty. The formal hearing affirmed the findings of the PEB held on 12 February 2007 which were the applicant was physically unfit and recommended a 10 percent disability rating for chronic neck pain due to degenerative disc disease and directed she be separated with severance pay. Those members who do not meet medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007123.
The applicant requests correction of his Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) records as follows: * have the TNARNG complete a line of duty (LOD) investigation * have the TNARNG process him through the medical evaluation board/physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB) * medical retirement by reason of disability 2. Chapter 3 provides for various medical conditions and physical defects which may render a Soldier unfit for further military service and which fall below the standards required for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012549
The board finds the applicant fit by presumption. Paragraph E3.P3.5.3 (Overcoming the Presumption) of DODI 1332.38 states the presumption of fitness rule shall be overcome when: a. an acute, grave illness or injury occurs within the presumptive period that would prevent the member from performing further duty if he or she were not retiring; or b. a serious deterioration of a previously-diagnosed condition, to include a chronic condition, occurs within the presumptive period and the...