Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007523
Original file (20120007523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  9 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007523 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, prior to separating from the Army he was never provided any information with respect to the eligibility requirements or TEB with respect to the Post-911 GI Bill.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Orders 049-0019, issued by the Installation Management Command, Fort Lewis, WA, dated 18 February 2009
* a newspaper clipping titled "Approved:  GI Bill Transfers"

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant retired from the Regular Army on 30 September 2009 by reason of sufficient service for retirement.  He completed 27 years, 1 month, and 19 days of creditable active service.

2.  During the processing of this case, on 18 June 2012, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Chief, Education Incentives Branch, who recommended granting administrative relief to the applicant because he was separated from active duty within 90 days of the Post-


9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program implementation on 1 August 2009.  The advisory official acknowledged that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service.  The advisory official further stated:

	a.  A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserves at the time of a TEB to his/her eligible family members (on or after
1 August 2009).  The applicant retired from the military service on 30 September 2009.

	b.  The applicant was eligible to participate in the program and he had family members eligible to receive those benefits.

	c.  The applicant had more than 26 years of service when he retired; therefore, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation.  Further, he had no record of adverse action.

3.  On 20 June 2012, the applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  On 8 July 2012, he concurred with the advisory official's recommendation.

4.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 is described under Title V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law
110-252, House of Representatives, 2642.  In July 2008, Congress passed a law for the Post-9/11 GI Bill which went into effect on 1 August 2009.

5.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members.  A service member may execute a TEB only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.  The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is responsible for final determination of eligibility for educational benefits under this program.  General eligibility criteria are as follows:

	a.  Service members must have accrued specific qualifying active service on or after 11 September 2001 of at least 30 continuous days of qualifying active duty service if discharged due to a service-connected disability or between 90 days and 36 months or more of total aggregate qualifying active duty service.

   b.  Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support 


of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service.

6.  The program guidance stipulates that if a service member becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013 and agrees to serve the additional period as specified below, he/she is entitled to transfer benefits to his/her family members.  A member is considered to be retirement eligible upon completion of 20 years of active Federal service or
20 qualifying years as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732:

	a.  service members eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009 – no additional service required;

	b.  service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional service required;

	c.  service members eligible for retirement after 1 August 2009 and before 1 August 2010 – 1 year of additional service is required;

	d.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2010 and before 1 August 2011 – 2 years of additional service is required;

	e.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2011 and before 1 August 2012 – 3 years of additional service is required; and

	f.  active duty service members who separate, retire, transfer to the Reserve, or who are discharged on or prior to 1 August 2009 are not eligible to elect transferability.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant had over 27 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to his eligible family members if he had transferred it before he left the service.

2.  During the initial implementation of this new program, many Soldiers at all grades were confused regarding their eligibility and/or the procedure to apply for such benefit.  This confusion was exacerbated with heavy use of the Department of Defense website and the lack of proper log-in credentials for those who may have signed out on transition leave within 90 days of the program implementation.  Similarly, officials at some education centers may have also been confused regarding the implementation instructions and may not have conducted proper counseling.

3.  The applicant's retirement date was 30 September 2009.  It is reasonable to presume that had he been aware of the procedure to transfer his benefits while in an active duty status he would have done so.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

___x__  ____x____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members prior to retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.



      _________x______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007523



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007523



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008150

    Original file (20120008150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service. The applicant had nearly 24 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008405

    Original file (20120008405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional service required. The applicant had over 28 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to his eligible family members if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020558

    Original file (20110020558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. The applicant had over 22 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer educational benefits to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010300

    Original file (20120010300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. The applicant had over 20 years of service upon his retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006769

    Original file (20120006769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official recommended granting the applicant administrative relief because the Post-9/11 GI Bill was implemented on 1 August 2009 and he was separated from active duty within 90 days of the program being implemented. The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or child if he had transferred the benefit before he left the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020444

    Original file (20110020444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official acknowledged that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021764

    Original file (20110021764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official recommended granting administrative relief to the applicant because he was separated from active duty within 90 days of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program implemented on 1 August 2009. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011004

    Original file (20120011004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was eligible to transfer his educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter. Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010807

    Original file (20120010807.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, she would have been eligible to transfer her educational benefits while still on active duty. The applicant had over 20 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and she would have been eligible to transfer the benefits if she had done so before she left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009409

    Original file (20120009409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he would have been eligible to transfer his educational benefits while still on active duty. In view of the fact that Soldiers who left military service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service, it would serve the interest of equity to correct her record to reflect she transferred her educational benefits while still serving on active duty as recommended in the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1,...